Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
No, not the opening ceremony insult to Christians worldwide. I am talking about the women's boxing event.
Yeah. I don't like the concept of "Women's Boxing" either. I'd rather see competition along the lines of "Women's Baking." Or "Women's Crafting." Or even "Women's Remodeling and DIY" (a forum in which even I might medal).
The current brouhaha seems designed to do nothing besides amplify the artificial confusion over the matter of what it is that makes a woman.
Here's the deal:
XX Chromosomes--biological woman
XY Chromosomes--biological man
End of story.
Not according to IOC spokesX Mark Adams:
But I hope we’re all agreed we’re not calling for people to go back to the bad old days of sex testing, which was a terrible thing to do and I’m sure we all agree that’s not the way forward in this situation.
Sorry. I don't agree. As long as you have a binary SEX distinction between what "Men" are and what "Women" are in your events, I think doing so is on you. When you have 57 — or 92, or whatever the number is these days — different "gender" events for each sport, then perhaps things might be different.
But, you don't. And they aren't.
Please tell me what is so wrong about the "bad old days" of sex testing (which would surely determine, without equivocation, whether or not these two apparent "men" have been put in the right bucket, when it comes to their eligibility for "men's" or "women's" events).
I'll wait.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (42)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I really wish Mark would explain precisely WHY sex testing was a terrible thing to do.
C'mon Mark. Educate me. Because I don't understand.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
He just gets off seeing actual women get crushed by fake women. It is an illness. He has self-identified, so he will not require testing. Just reeducation.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
And then there is this idiot. Who is going to tell him about a scientific way to define a woman so that he can look into it? Sheesh.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I'm bummed. I decided to blow off the Olympics due to Lebron "the Kneeler" James carrying the US flag in the opening ceremonies.
The IOC can all go hang for all I care.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yeah. He claims he's totally open to "the science" if someone can come up with an unequivocal definition of "a woman."
Here you go:
The "feelz?" Not scientific. Not important.
What on earth am I missing?
You're seeing five of 42 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.