3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. The Daily Telegraph Goes Wobbly?
September 7, 2026 at 9:03 PM

The Daily Telegraph Goes Wobbly?

She
@She

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark23likesJoin to like18comments
File:Daily Telegraph.svg

I'm afraid so.

It may or may not have anything to do with the recent purchase of The Telegraph Media Group by Axel Springer for a little more than half a billion pounds in mid 2026. Axel Springer also runs the German brands Bild and Die Welt (German-language brands billed as leaning "center-right"), as well as the US brands Politico and Business Insider (English-language brands leaning "center-left" or just wholly "left").

Nevertheless.

As a subscriber to The Telegraph (which isn't cheap on an annual basis), I'm getting a bit fed up. Most recently with the site's coverage of protests within the UK when it comes to immigration. There are four articles I can search on the site that have to do with a bit of a barney in Dover over the last couple of days:

There's an article titled Police Response to Dover Blockade 'too slow' says council, by reporter Will Bolton.

And The Dover Protests are Unacceptable by "Telegraph View"

And Who are the masked protestors who brought Dover to a standstill? by Patrick Sawyer

And Dover anti-migrant blockade exposes police failures by Patrick Sawyer and Steve Bird.

Along the way, and in one of these articles, some clown from The Telegraph says the following:

"...the protest, however, appears to be a calculated attempt to disrupt everyday life for ordinary people and businesses, and cause economic damage to a key infrastructure in order to grab attention."

As a (premium) subscriber to the site, I'm prohibited from responding to this slur, or commenting on any of these articles, because all comments have been closed, because, apparently I'm untrusted to weigh in on what The Telegraph apparently fears may be opinions from "the other side."

This so reminds me of my mother, from the mid 1950s, who wouldn't let us kids watch anything that wasn't on the BBC, when ITV (the new channel, and which she always referred to as "the rough lot") first came on the air. I guess I resent The Telegraph's lumping me with "the rough lot," and refusing to allow me the privilege, which I've paid for (at many times that which I pay for here) to comment.

But, Never Say Die! (I never do.)

I found an article from only a few days ago, about a group of Just Stop Oil protestors determined to disrupt Andy Burnham's first Prime Minister's Questions session this past Wednesday.

They, and their concerns, are generously and uncritically covered, without--apparently--any concern as to whether the activities of the Just Stop Oil gang might be messing about with the innate rights of "ordinary people", AKA British Citizens, to go about their business on a regular basis without Just Stop Oil "grabbing attention" and getting in their way.

The clue is in the headline: Just Stop Oil's PMQs protests bring Westminster traffic to a halt. After all, who cares about "Westminster traffic?" No "ordinary people," right? No parent trying to get his or her kid to school. No emergency medical or police vehicle trying to get through to deal with a crisis? No adult child desperately trying to reach a dementia-ridden parent. No NHS professionals trying to do their jobs. (Apparently--at least--we no longer have to stand at the side of the road and bang pots and pans for them either, and that is a good thing.)

Nobody important at all. Just Just Stop Oil. Which is all that counts. Because they mean so well.

Marvelously, I can comment all I want on that post, while The Telegraph seems totally fine with it all. (Here's what I hope is a behind-the-paywall link to the relevant article): https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/800802c509ccf12d

Since I can still comment on this particular article, here's what I said:

Funny that I can still comment on this article.

There are four articles that come up in a search of DT posts having to do with the recent "Far Right" (😱) protests in Dover, on none of which we fee-paying subscribers are allowed to comment, and about which The Telegraph says:

"...the protest, however, appears to be a calculated attempt to disrupt everyday life for ordinary people and businesses, and cause economic damage to a key infrastructure in order to grab attention."

That's a disgusting slur.

See if you can find a single sentence, or even a dependent clause, which is even mildly critical, or editorializes in any way as to cast shade as to the motives of the "Just Stop Oil" protestors involved here.

Talk about tone deafness. That The Telegraph apparently feels no sense of self-awareness when it comes to reports on the "Just Stop Oil" crew, or the "Queers for Gaza" fools, or any other Left-Wing tools interested in preventing the majority of British people living their lives normally and without harassment and interruption, is deeply informative.

Thanks, DT, for "raising your colours."

The last sentence is a reference to "Operation Raise the Colours."

The bankrupt Birmingham City Council has recently announced that it is prepared to spend £2.6 million (about $3.5million) in order to take down the English and UK flags that have been erected on city telegraph and power poles (20,000, or so we are led to believe) at a cost of £132 pounds for each flag to be demounted. Again, my comments.

First one was:

So they can't get the bins emptied, but they can spend money to get the flags taken down.

Sorry, it's inside baseball. Or perhaps, if you're from West Bromwich, it's inside Baggies football. Most of "Brummagem" hasn't had its garbage picked up since March of 2025. The photos you can search on Google are truly horrifying.

My second posted comment is the one from above, in which I suggested that the DT seems to have lost the plot when it comes to the way it covers the left-wing loons (with nary a bit of skepticism or judgementalism), compared to what it has to say about those on the right.

I am still not quite ready to give up on the newspaper of my life and my childhood. My family always read, and held onto the Daily Telegraph, particularly my mother's love of the cryptic crossword (and the Sunday crossword--Dad would cheat, and others in the family pretended not to notice), and we perused it daily (after the servants had ironed it, of course). I love the daily puzzles. I abhor the idiot "royal correspondents" and their regular leftist nitwittery. And the hunt for the regular panic du jour? Well, here's what I sent to my sister this morning (my own captions on a widely published meme).

Honestly, Daily Telegraph, if it's not enough that I'm somewhat ashamed of you, perhaps you should be ashamed of yourself. Because this is what you've become:

God help the UK.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (18)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    genferei@genferei·5w

    It has been a long, long time since the Torygraph. Or perhaps it’s better to say it’s been a long, long time since the Tories even bothered trying to pretend they were anything but the Blob with blue rosettes. Only by assuming the entire political project of the last two generations has been to bring on Powell’s rivers of blood can anything be explained rationally…

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sisyphus@Sisyphus·5w

    The Telegraph had been one of my favorite go toes for thirty years. When they finally put the paywall up I got back hours per week to peruse alternatives. Sad to see them fall to the German menace. But I hear that AfD has won some local elections quite convincingly and the "Our Democracy" crowd is working on the plan to keep AfD out of power. I cannot imagine a better way to multiply AfD support, but they never learn.

    I suspect that you were unable to comment on that first story because people who preceded you were venting their wrath appropriately and, bereft of the intellectual skills to engage in debate and defend their indefensible position, they "cut the mic", so to speak. Respond on X, if you are so inclined.

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Brickhouse Hank@HankRhody·5w
    She (View Post):

    a bit of a barney

    I know that one! It came up in Ocean's Eleven.

    "We've got barney!"

    [blank stares all around]

    "Barney Rubble?"

    [...]

    Trouble!

    That's the second time Cockney rhyming slang has come up this week. The second came from the brand new and by all accounts hilariously terrible movie The Runner. "You've been telling little butterfly lies."

    Disparu, having the time of his life with this movie, explains it thusly:

    Butterflies? No; we call them porkies. Porky pies. Lies; Cockney rhyming slang. But you didn't want to call them porkies did you? Because of pork, and London. It's not halal! [Breaks down laughing]

    My question is, I understood the rhyming slang to be a class identifier, signifying low class thugs. While there are many adjectives I would use to describe our charming hostess here "low class" and "thug" do not make the list. Well, there's a faint possibility of thug insofar as I'd hate to go up against her in a dark alley at night. But I've gotten well off track. How much has Cockney rhyming slang penetrated into English vernacular in general?

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    James Lileks@jameslileks·5w

    I have an 86-year-old friend who considers himself Labour since forever. He is a confirmed Telegraph reader, because it's the sensible paper, not mad or woke or faddishly wet. Shows you how things have drifted.

    I read the Telegraph through Apple News, which includes a substantial amount of the paper - main stories, opinions. It doesn't give you the pleasures of the physical edition, of course, and when I am in England I swoon over that damned thing - the glossy magazines, the tab inserts, the clear and clean layout. Opening it up over breakfast is one of my pleasures in life. Be a dear and pass the shredded orange marmalade?

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    James Lileks@jameslileks·5w

    My friend is also cranky on Israel in a not-particularly-well-informed way, AND, is also a dear friend of Maureen Lippman - he was her pianist on many performance and TV shows - and was pleased that the Telegraph gave her the chance to write an op-ed about the actor who refused to appear with her on stage because of her pro-Israel stance.

    It's a small world and a smaller island.

Scroll for later comments
+13 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 18 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •