3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Get the States Out of the Primary Business
December 30, 2023 at 4:30 PM

Get the States Out of the Primary Business

EJHill
@EJHill

STAFF • CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark28likesJoin to like27comments

The only Congressional offices mentioned in the Constitution are the Speaker of the House, The President of the Senate (aka, the Vice-President) and the President Pro Tem. What is not mentioned is the offices that now dominate those institutions: The Majority Leaders, whose offices were established closer to the turn of the 20th Century than to the Constitutional Convention. (The House elected its first in 1899, the Senate in 1913.) In short, while political parties were probably unavoidable, they are also extra-constitutional.

In light of the arguments surrounding Donald Trump's eligibility for the 2024 presidential ballot we need to ask ourselves why state officials and courts feel they have the power and the right to decide such matters for the primaries. (The general election is a whole other can of worms.) The primaries are not an election, the primaries are a selection - and a selection for private organizations at that.

The reason the states feel they have that right is because they pay for them. State legislatures set the dates and dole out millions to run them. How much? Well, it's hard to pin down. Estimates vary from a half a billion dollars on up. A single congressional district election in Illinois can cost $2.58M. (ABCNews estimate from 2012 so add 35% for inflation.)

Iowa doesn't have that problem in the presidential process because they caucus - and when they gather next month the parties will be picking up the bill. And it's way past time that they did that with the primaries, too. If you're third party or independent, why should you as a taxpayer, be asked to underwrite a process that excludes you?

So, let's get back to that "other can of worms" previously mentioned. In a way, perhaps the Democrats have screwed up tactically here. It might have worked out better for them had they simply kept their powder dry and let the primaries play out and then declare Trump ineligible for the general election. Unless, of course, you're like me and believe that this whole charade is intended to boost Trump as the nominee and then it's perfectly logical.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (27)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    namlliT noD@DonTillman·2y

    Well, California has already done that, mostly, with their "Jungle Primaries"; a runoff system where the top two primary winners go to the general election, regardless of party.

    What ends up happening in California is that there are no Republicans to vote for in the general.

    Or more specifically, Senator Kamala Harris.

  • STAFF • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EJHill@EJHill·2y
    ReplyingtonamlliT noD

    namlliT noD (View Comment):

    Well, California has already done that, mostly, with their “Jungle Primaries”; a runoff system where the top two primary winners go to the general election, regardless of party.

    But not the presidential race. They still conduct a "modified-closed presidential primary."

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    MarciN@MarciN·2y

    For about a hundred reasons, I agree with EJ Hill in this post completely.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Percival@Percival·2y
    EJHill (View Post):
    A single congressional district election in Illinois can cost $2.58M.

    Registering all those dead people ain't cheap.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)@DonG·2y
    EJHill (View Post):
    why state officials and courts feel they have the power

    And why can't a county official feel they have that power? There are 3244 counties. It takes just one populous county to flip a swing state.

Scroll for later comments
+22 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 27 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •