3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Criminalize Protestors Blocking Freeways
January 4, 2024 at 5:15 PM

Criminalize Protestors Blocking Freeways

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark27likesJoin to like69comments

It’s outrageous enough to have pro-Hamas protestors decrying the actions of Israelis when they either don’t know what is going on in Israel or they claim that the reports on atrocities are all lies. But now it seems that the latest demonstrations they are pursuing, where roads and highways are blocked, are not only inconvenient to everyone else, but lives could be in jeopardy. These protests are being funded by George Soros money, in his ongoing attempt to destroy this country. It’s about time to issue serious penalties for these behaviors.

Most recently, protests that have been reported to have taken place in San Francisco, Chicago, Los Angeles and New York. These protests are not conducted by just a few demonstrators:

The protesters in Chicago were a group called the US Palestinian Community Network, and they formed a caravan of about 100 cars that drove first to some Chicago politicians’ homes before moving on to I-190 in Chicago and bringing trarffic to a halt. Both sides of the freeway were temporarily shut down, reported Yahoo News.

San Francisco’s new district attorney is determined to ensure that laws are enforced:

In November, similar protesters shut down San Francisco’s heavily traveled Bay Bridge for four hours.

Caught in the nightmare traffic jam were three transplant organs in transit to and from University of California San Francisco medical facilities.

UCSF transplant surgeon said the protest delayed vital surgeries. Such delays could have caused complications for patients, Dr. Garrett Roll said.

The new district attorney announced that 80 people would be charged with unlawful assembly and 29 vehicles were towed.

In New York, protestors brought traffic to a standstill on the Van Wyck Expressway; 26 people were arrested for disorderly conduct and impeding vehicular traffic. In Los Angeles, protestors dragged debris, traffic cones and trash bins onto a major road leading to the airport.

Unfortunately, I think these penalties are inadequate to deter the protestors, especially considering the ramifications of their actions. In many cases, Soros may be footing the bill for any fines these protestors must pay; that includes fines required for the release of towed vehicles.

There are potential penalties that may help to stop these protestors from their illegal demonstrations.

One writer recommended that those people injured consider tort action:

On Wednesday anti-Israel protesters blocked access to JFK and LAX airports in New York and Los Angeles, respectively. The laws of New York and California, like most states, recognize the tort. While there is no precedent applying this tort to road-blocking protesters, it fits the offense. The purpose of these demonstrations is to block the road to keep people from getting to the airport—deliberately and against their will.

In Mississippi, lawmakers considered criminalizing these actions:

Republican lawmakers in Mississippi are seeking to increase penalties for people who block public roadways during protests. Several Democrats, however, are expressing concerns about legislation that could be seen as criminalizing free speech. Republican Sen. Chad McMahan of Guntown proposed the ‘Freedom of Roadway Act’ to ‘criminalize the malicious obstruction of a public street, highway or road during an unpermitted protest.’ Senate Bill 2283 would require that protesters who block roadways with no permit be fined up to $1,500, serve up to a year in jail or both. The minimum punishment would be a $500 fine and a 25-day jail sentence.

Due to the possibility of a claim that free speech is being penalized, the legislation was amended to duplicate existing law that bans a “person” from blocking roadways. Unfortunately, the law died in committee.

In April 2021 in the midst of the George Floyd riots, Gov. Ron DeSantis took action:

At the bill signing Monday, DeSantis said, ‘If you riot, if you loot, if you harm others, particularly if you harm a law enforcement officer during one of these violent assemblies, you're going to jail.’

The law increases penalties for protesters who block roadways or deface public monuments. It creates a new crime, ‘mob intimidation.’ And it requires that anyone arrested at a protest be denied bail until their first court appearance, likely making for overnight jail stays.

In protest, the ACLU spoke out:

Micah Kubic, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, said, ‘To be clear, the goal of this law is to silence dissent and create fear among Floridians who want to take to the streets to march for justice.’

No protestors have anything to fear, anywhere, as long as they follow the law.

This law should be one of many that forbid protestors from intimidating ordinary citizens and holding them hostage. People could die in their cars or in ambulances, unable to reach a hospital. It’s about time that lawmakers got creative and enacted laws that protect citizens, not criminals.

My last suggestion is not likely to be accepted, but I think anyone who is arrested should be required to view a video, even a short one, on the atrocities that Hamas has conducted. It should be a condition for release from jail.

Maybe that will change minds and hearts.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (69)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y

    I think anyone funding them should be charged under RICO.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·2y
    ReplyingtoBryan G. Stephens

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I think anyone funding them should be charged under RICO.

    Now that's the kind of creative thinking I like to see! I hope others weigh in so that we can stop protestors from taking us hostage!

  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y
    ReplyingtoSusan Quinn

    Bryan G. Stephens (View Comment):

    I think anyone funding them should be charged under RICO.

    Susan Quinn (View Comment):

    Now that’s the kind of creative thinking I like to see! I hope others weigh in so that we can stop protestors from taking us hostage!

    I can't take credit. Democrats showed me the way!

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)@DonG·2y

    in the Marxist playbook, the reaction is the action. These "protests" are designed to frustrate Americans and cause them to overreact. This is a problem for government to fix, but most city governments are sympathetic with the Marxists.

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Rodin@Rodin·2y

    The Supreme Court has always upheld reasonable restrictions on time, place and manner to let people demonstrate and get their message out without interfering with other people's needs to access services. Notice that oftentimes the proposed law changes are to increase penalties, not to make blocking businesses and roadways illegal. This is a law enforcement issue and the willingness or unwillingness of the various jurisdictions to face criticism for action or inaction.

Scroll for later comments
+64 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 69 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •