Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Can some journalist please interview some of the recently arrived illegal immigrants — OK, I’ll accept it even if the journalist chooses to call them “migrants” or “newcomers” — what, exactly, did they think was going to happen once they illegally entered the United States? What was their specific plan?
In a hearing in which illegal immigrants were complaining about the quality and quantity of the goods and services that were being given to them at no charge to the immigrants, a New York City Councilwoman (a Republican, is that allowed in New York City?), asked some questions about what more the illegal immigrants expected. The councilwoman appears to be asking out of frustration that the city couldn’t do more. So her thinking seems to be, "The taxpayers should take care of whoever shows up. It's tragic we can't afford to. But it did cause me to wonder, what exactly do the immigrants think is going to happen when they arrive?” What is their plan? Do they really expect someone else to take care of their every need or want? And for how long? Do they have any concrete plans to become self-sustaining?
“At the shelter, the food, my kids cannot eat the food at the shelter,” said one woman. “They give us two months to stay at the shelter and then you have to go out again with your luggages [sic] and your kids and find another place. It’s very difficult.”
The immigrant expected it to be easy? Until figuratively five minutes ago, did any immigrant anywhere expect an easy time? Immigration has been hard any time, anywhere. Did she expect that when she just showed up without permission in a new country, somebody there was just going to magically take care of not just her needs, but also her wants, for an indefinite length of time? Did she not expect to have to find her own place to live? To find a way to earn money to buy food for her children?
When I was a child, my family lived in a foreign country for a year while my father taught as a visiting professor at a university. So yes, he had a job. But my parents still had to put in an enormous amount of planning to ensure we had a place to live and that my brother and I had schooling arranged. It was still very hard, especially on my mother. My brother and I (ages 5 and 7, who caught onto the local language faster than my mother did) had to help our mother navigate the markets and other necessities of local daily life. The markets were nothing like the stores my mother was used to in California. We had to figure them out. We had to navigate foreign (for us) customs and expectations with our landlord and our neighbors. We had to figure out how to get around the city. Even with the university’s support of my father in his teaching position, we could not have just showed up and expected someone magically to take care of everything.
When my ancestors arrived in the United States in the 19th century from central Europe and from Ireland, they had relatives with whom they had corresponded and thus knew would take them in for a while, but that they’d have to quickly find employment and their own places to live.
When we lived in southern California more than 25 years ago, we had a non-trivial number of illegal immigrants around. But at that time the illegal immigrants came knowing they had to arrange their own housing, and find some (generally under the table) way to earn money so they could eat. To afford housing they lived ten or twelve people to a one-bedroom apartment, which created lots of local problems. But at least they didn’t start off assuming somebody else was going to take care of them. And they were studiously trying to stay out of sight.
I acknowledge that I am more of a planner than most people. I don’t take a trip without a pretty solid and detailed plan. If I’m flying, I know where I’m staying — with a guaranteed reservation, and know how I’m getting from the airport to the lodging. If I’m driving, I know where I’m going to stop overnight — and have made reservations, and where there will be long gaps in the drive with no gasoline or rest rooms. I’m likely to plan even where, at least approximately, I’m going to stop for lunch. I’ve probably planned ahead at least my first day at the destination – what activities I intend to do, how I’m going to get to them, and what I expect to happen when I get there.
So maybe I don’t appreciate that people can go off on significant adventures with no plan whatsoever. But who, with thinking capacities beyond a six-year-old, just shows up in a foreign country and expects to walk on Easy Street paved with gold using the energy and money of the people of the destination country?
Many of us express annoyance at the explicit and implicit invitations by President Biden for foreigners to just come, and we have generalized complaints about the willingness of government agencies and other organizations to provide help to people who enter the country illegally. We hear illegal immigrants express generalized plans to travel to certain cities. But what exactly are the details of the immigrants’ plan? Specifics. How do they expect to earn money? When do they expect to do that? How do they expect to find housing? When? They know they need to eat. Continuously. How do they expect to do that? Do they really cross the border expecting that “someone” in the U.S.A. will take care of their every need and even want, and make it easy on them?
One gets the impression the recent illegal arrivals seem to think they don’t need to make any plans or arrangements. They just have to show up and they’ll be taken care of. Who and what is giving them that impression?
What do the current immigrants who enter the United States illegally think they are going to be doing the day after their arrival? A week later? A month later? Three months later? A year later?
This is separate from the slaves that are being trafficked who know there is a pimp to whom they are obliged. Senator Ted Cruz describes those as the girls who claim to be heading to their “tio” (uncle). Slaves rely on their pimps.
And not the terrorists, foreign revolution agents, gang members, and others who enter with overt ill intent.
And we know that the pleas of, “they are terrorized individuals fleeing persecution in their home country, so of course they have no plan other than escape” are almost universally false.
I'm asking about the regular people, the ones their advocates are saying we should welcome with open arms.
Maybe some people expect their “coyotes” to take care of them, which the coyotes do not, abandoning their charges as soon as they enter the United States.
But, there are plenty of people who enter the United States illegally on their own volition. I would think they ought to have some plan for life in the United States before they enter. What are the details of their plans and expectations? Can someone ask them?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (25)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Nobody emphasizes this enough. Ninety percent of them are lying. Basically, you have to be under one-way political, or religious persecution. So, for example, nobody from Somalia would qualify. I mean that's what gets me. They are supposed to go to an actual port of entry and not lie about asylum.
These people are insane.
What needs to happen is, everybody in these countries that is involved in organized crime needs to be assassinated or shape things up like the guy in El Salvador. They need to be taught math, English, and Spanish in their own country. We like to generate inflation so we can't be letting in uneducated immigrants that depress wages.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Really excellent post, Full Size Tabby.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The U.S.A. is giving them that impression. But even if it didn't, they might still come, just because it's near. I think these people simply don't make plans, or weigh options, or project futures.
The following doesn't prove anything, since it didn't yield anything, but I decided to look up the Spanish for "improvident," then do an Internet search for it. Do these migrants' own cultures call them that? Well...I can't tell! The word by the way is not in my University of Chicago dictionary, and online sources are uncertain to put it mildly. The Spanish word may be impróvido, or improvisor. Hand those to a search engine, it smoothly assumes you meant something else! And if you click the show-results-only-for literal link, the hits themselves are still off-topic. About things in Italian, or Latin. I tried inmigrantes impróvidos and that too swung me wide of anything in, near, or from Mexico.
I do not think that search engines are playing a wicked game here...although they could be. I prefer to think the engines' employees got - as journalists seem to get - very spotty educations, are poorly read and ill-experienced, have never seen the word "improvident" before, and program lots of shortcuts that guarantee something gets flung back, regardless of its pertinence. Who's gonna know? Maybe there was a time when a search engine took a deep breath, read the entire Internet, then delivered its findings. I suspect all such online utilities now work from the very limited feedstock that the purplehairs think is adequate.
But another possibility is that the source material really is scarce. It may truly be the case that in the migrants' home countries, nobody judges them or even discusses them. That is consistent with my idea that those are cultures where nobody, not even the smart people, think ahead.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
And stop at the first country reached upon fleeing your oppressive country and not waiting until you reach Uncle Sugar, right?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yep.
They are totally abusing the legal category of "parole", too. It's millions right now. It used to be dozens annually before Biden.
You're seeing five of 25 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.