Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Someone on Ricochet posted a link to a brilliantly written Mark Steyn article. If you haven’t read it, I think you should. Among various frauds discussed is half a billion dollars allocated to Internews Network, an NGO headquartered in an abandoned building. This is a trope of movies and TV, but in real life, it is jarring to see it actually happening with one’s tax money.
Steyn, in turn, linked to an excellent article by Mark Hemingway and Ben Weingarten, titled:
Willful Blindness: Feds Ignore Illegal Alien ID Theft Plaguing Americans as U.S. Coffers Fill.
The historic surge of illegal immigrants across America’s southern border is fueling a hidden crime spree few in Washington seem willing or able to address: widespread identity theft victimizing unwitting Americans perpetrated by migrants who need U.S. credentials to work...
The incentive for illegals to steal someone else’s Social Security Number is to gain broader employment opportunities.
A telling indication of the scope of the criminality is provided by a little-known government accounting book, the Social Security Administration’s Earnings Suspense File (ESF). It reflects the earnings of employees whose W-2 wage and tax statements have names and Social Security numbers that do not match official records. The total logged in the file has increased tenfold from $188.9 billion at the dawn of the millennium to $1.9 trillion in 2021.
One might think that with duplicate SSNs being used, along with employers filing W-2s on all workers, it would be easy for Uncle Sam to apprehend ID thieves. But…
This identity-related crime is providing a windfall for the U.S. government. A 2017 study from the conservative Federation for American Immigration Reform found that the federal government collects about $22 billion annually in tax receipts from illegal aliens, with the bulk going toward Social Security ($12.6 billion) and Medicare ($5.9 billion) – programs from which noncitizens are ineligible to receive benefits.
The article goes on to detail government indifference to this crime because of… oh, just read the article. Which brings me to my favorite subject - me!
A couple decades ago, when interest rates were low, I decided to refinance my mortgage. Things went smoothly until I died. That’s what the credit bureaus reported, anyway. I had apparently expired in California, despite having never lived there, and so my loan application was rejected.
I was not the source of that misinformation but the burden was on me to correct it. The credit bureaus had, in true Big Brother fashion, gathered my personal information, without my knowledge or permission. They had also mixed in data from someone else who died while using my SSN. They were peddling this false information to banks for profit and, in the process, destroyed my credit. And they weren’t interested in correcting their mistake.
I contested this but the credit bureaus were indifferent and I didn’t make much progress. Several people suggested I contact Social Security to establish my ongoing animation, and so I visited a nearby SS office. I delivered my tale of woe to the agent, who seemed bemused, having never spoken to a dead SSN holder before. But she was helpful, checked the computer, and gave me a letter stating I was still making payments into the Social Security trust fund. That letter enabled me to get the financing I desired.
A few years later it was time to trade in my old vehicle. I selected a new ride, and the dealership was naturally eager to help me finance the outstanding balance. But the loan officer came back with bad news: I was still dead. I made it plain that I was not, and I was in no mood to prove it again. Being a resourceful guy, he found a bank that loaned to dead people (not really) and I left with a new Toyota.
I would like to repeat that the credit bureaus were indifferent to my situation and happy to keep selling my inaccurate credit report. Likewise, even though I was in annual contact with the IRS, they had never complained. The Social Security Administration was oblivious. One would think that red flags would have popped up, but if they did, they were ignored. And the aforementioned article lays out the “reasons.”
A few years later I financed another small loan for a car, and my resurrection was acknowledged. No one mentioned my previous demise.
The article mentions victims of ID theft who suffered far more than I. See Marcus Calvillo. Government indifference to ID theft is horrifying. I have hope that may soon change.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (22)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Again ( he said, exhausted), with all of the now double and sometimes irritating triple cross-verification of my identity I have to perform every time I simply want to relog onto Google, why is it so impossible for our government, the keeper of our most precious records, and with financial resources beyond the ken of everyone who has come before us, to simply keep an accurate determination of who is who?
Evidently it is because they don’t want to. And don’t think that they have to.
Why are they so surprised that we don’t trust them one little bit?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It should be obvious from my post that I was very unhappy with the credit bureaus. I am now transferring that disdain to our government.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You think YOU had it bad? Check out the story of the guy who was actually institutionalized, for YEARS, for claiming to actually be himself.
The credit bureaus make it far worse. When someone impersonating you has been using your identity for years, things happen such as your past living addresses being THEIR past living addresses. Which means when asked to prove you're you, you can't! Because you don't know and can't verify those addresses which you never lived at!
That your impersonator died, was likely a huge benefit to you.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yes, I got off easy.
The article doesn't cover it, but Marcus Calvillo located his impersonator while the perp was in prison (which appeared on Calvillo's record). Calvillo tried to get the state penitentiary to change the perp's name back to his real one, but they declined. Under that state's law, a prisoner cannot change his name, even back to his real one, while incarcerated. The record wasn't corrected until the perp was released.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yesterday, Nicole Shanahan conducted the very first interview (about 17 mins long) that the indefatigably intrepid "DataRepublican" decided to give. Internews Network is mentioned.
Enjoy:
You're seeing five of 22 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.