The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowFederalist Radio HourNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMadison’s NotesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. Quote of the Day: Fickleness and Folly
August 17, 2026 at 12:33 PM

Quote of the Day: Fickleness and Folly

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark14likesJoin to like19comments
The inquiry constantly is what will please, not what will benefit the people. In such a government there can be nothing but temporary expedient, fickleness and folly. -Alexander Hamilton

At the time that Alexander Hamilton made this statement, I imagine it was probably accurate. Unfortunately, not much has changed.

Today, the focus on pleasing oneself is still true, but priorities have changed, and not for the better. Our representatives believe they know what is best for us. No matter what the polls say, they will make decisions (or not make them as the case may be) that serve a tiny elite, their biggest donors, or their own personal agendas. At this writing, President Trump has been on a campaign to get the Save America Act passed, and poll after poll suggests overwhelming support. The law would require prospective voters to present identification and proof of birth in the United States to cast ballots. Even with a small majority, you would think Republicans could get this legislation passed. Who would object to election integrity?

The Democrats complain that this law will disenfranchise voters who, despite functioning well in a modern society that expects identification for countless activities, wouldn’t know how to get the required documents. And Republicans, according to John Thune, don’t have enough votes to get the bill through Congress. It will be fascinating to see whether these people can get their act together and do the right thing.

I’m doubtful, since integrity and benefiting the people of this country are not a high priority for them.

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (19)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·12w
    Susan Quinn (View Post):
    I’m doubtful, since integrity and benefiting the people of this country is not a high priority for them.

    Benefiting themselves seems to be the main reason people run for office.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·12w

    You can sign up here for "Quote of the Day" for August! Join in the fun!

  • BT

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·12w

    So elections go forth with no trust in the results from the people. I say that we see exactly that same result in the imposed healthcare approach illustrated most recently in the disputes about the administration of processes related to vaccine treatments. It's a world of make-believe today.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Stad@Stad·12w
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    The law would insist that people have to present identification and proof of birth in the United States, in order to vote.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the proof of citizenship is in order to register to vote . . .

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·12w
    ReplyingtoStad
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    The law would insist that people have to present identification and proof of birth in the United States, in order to vote.

    Stad (View Comment):

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe the proof of citizenship is in order to register to vote . . .

    Correct. My bad. When you go to vote, though, shouldn't you need identification?

+14 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 19 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •