Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
The inquiry constantly is what will please, not what will benefit the people. In such a government there can be nothing but temporary expedient, fickleness and folly. -Alexander Hamilton
At the time that Alexander Hamilton made this statement, I imagine it was probably accurate. Unfortunately, not much has changed.
Today, the focus on pleasing oneself is still true, but priorities have changed, and not for the better. Our representatives believe they know what is best for us. No matter what the polls say, they will make decisions (or not make them as the case may be) that serve a tiny elite, their biggest donors, or their own personal agendas. At this writing, President Trump has been on a campaign to get the Save America Act passed, and poll after poll suggests overwhelming support. The law would require prospective voters to present identification and proof of birth in the United States to cast ballots. Even with a small majority, you would think Republicans could get this legislation passed. Who would object to election integrity?
The Democrats complain that this law will disenfranchise voters who, despite functioning well in a modern society that expects identification for countless activities, wouldn’t know how to get the required documents. And Republicans, according to John Thune, don’t have enough votes to get the bill through Congress. It will be fascinating to see whether these people can get their act together and do the right thing.
I’m doubtful, since integrity and benefiting the people of this country are not a high priority for them.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (19)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Benefiting themselves seems to be the main reason people run for office.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You can sign up here for "Quote of the Day" for August! Join in the fun!
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
So elections go forth with no trust in the results from the people. I say that we see exactly that same result in the imposed healthcare approach illustrated most recently in the disputes about the administration of processes related to vaccine treatments. It's a world of make-believe today.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the proof of citizenship is in order to register to vote . . .
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Correct. My bad. When you go to vote, though, shouldn't you need identification?
You're seeing five of 19 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.