Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Criminals get caught when they brag. They seemingly cannot help it.
All these "hidden camera" interviews where government workers or politicians let the cat out of the bag to a perfect stranger over a drink (with perhaps some sexual attraction thrown in for good measure) are pretty much the same thing. Look at all the leaks to journalists by people whose job it is to keep a secret, yet are somehow incapable of doing so.
Or even consider Hunter Biden, who blabbed endlessly to prostitutes. Wow. Using beautiful women to get powerful men to talk is a technique as old as time. What is astonishing is that it works.
Why?
My wife suggests that for a lot of people, their only real goal is to be respected by others - so blabbing is not a failure, but is instead their very reason for existence: talking is their currency.
I wonder at this, because the single greatest thing I can imagine achieving in my life is that people look at what I have done, and say that it was all G-d's doing. I want people to see how great the Torah is - since all I am doing is uncovering what is already there (and has been, for thousands of years). My Torah work (both here and on my blog) is published anonymously.
And my perseverance in other things is truly only because I know G-d is with me. So any successes that occur are, in fact, the successes of G-d, and nobody else. If I did not have that relationship with G-d, then I would never have striven and taken these kinds of risks in the first place.
But if you do not have that deep relationship with G-d, then you need to rely on what other people think of you. And to boost yourself in their eyes, you feel the need to brag, to tell things that not everybody knows (and indeed, things you are not supposed to say).
Do I have this right? Is there a better explanation for why people cannot keep their traps shut?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (20)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
If we need a slogan to go with MAGA, I propose SUGA: Shut Up and Go Away.
I'm aware that STFU is a thing but I don't want to wear it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have a one word answer, but my comment would get flagged . . .
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I would like most people to shut up most of the time whether or not there are criminal charges/government secrets at stake.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I've often thought that it would be an interesting military strategery to send a thousand topless women on horseback into battle against a traditional (male) army. I think enough of the dudes would be so distracted that the chicks would be at an advantage.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Women are great distractions.
But upper body strength limitations would mean that they would not be effective fighters.
You're seeing five of 20 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.