3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Israel, Hamas and the Never-Ending War
January 18, 2026 at 12:04 PM

Israel, Hamas and the Never-Ending War

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark15likesJoin to like54comments

Everyone saw this coming. Despite the ceasefire agreed to in October 2025, Hamas refuses to disarm, as they’d promised. Thus, Israel will have to disarm them by force. Hamas has made a token effort to disarm, but it doesn’t fulfill the original promise:

Israel and the U.S. have said Hamas needs to give up its weapons in compliance with the cease-fire agreement. Hamas is open to giving up what is left of its stock of heavy weapons, but won’t turn over its small arms, Arab officials said. Israel estimates the group has 60,000 rifles and 20,000 fighters. An Israeli official said Hamas won’t be able to shirk its obligation to relinquish its arms. The official said that if the group doesn’t willingly give up its weapons, Israel would force it to do so.

Meanwhile, Hamas proves that they never took the ceasefire seriously. They are rebuilding their military capability, are hiring and training more soldiers, are restoring the tunnel system that Israel had begun to destroy, and have received an infusion of cash, through intermediary sources, to fund their efforts:

Since the cease-fire ended, Hamas has cracked down on opponents and moved to strengthen its grip over Gaza. The group has been appointing new commanders to succeed those who were killed and has started rebuilding some of its damaged tunnel infrastructure, Arab and Israeli officials said. The group is also rebuilding its financial coffers with access to cash it had stored in tunnels, from taxation, and an influx from Iran, the officials said.

The primary question to be asked is: Did anyone think the ceasefire would bring an end to the war? Clearly Hamas has taken the break as an opportunity to rebuild its forces; Israel may have benefited from the break, since their reserve forces were already overtaxed.

But given Hamas’ reticence about disarming, the efforts they’ve made to restore their forces, and the declaration they made in December 2025, they fervently plan to continue the fight indefinitely, or, as they would have it, until Israel is destroyed:

The Hamas manifesto released in December 2025 underscores the organization’s belief that the outcomes of the war justified its costs. It portrays Hamas as the central pillar of Palestinian society and, as noted by the INSS, characterizes the ‘al-Aqsa Flood’ as a rebirth of a movement that perceives itself as victorious.

Israelis, on the other hand, want the war to be over. Now that they have most of the hostages back, they want to try to lead some semblance of a normal life. They hold onto this hope, while Hamas continues to restore its original fighting locations in tunnels, hospitals, schools and other government facilities. And other countries are unwilling to join an international security force in Gaza because they don’t want to be responsible for shooting Hamas soldiers. Any recovery as a result of the ceasefire is an illusion. It is beyond bizarre that any world leader could believe that peace can be restored by following the current path:

What comes next for Gaza may be driven by illusory signs of progress, such as Hamas allowing ‘independent’ Palestinians to manage daily affairs while it governs from the shadows through intimidation. The reality on the ground suggests that this would be more illusion than substance. And it is that reality, not diplomatic theory, that should guide decisions about Gaza’s future.

Either both sides should plan on a never-ending war, with all its tragedy and destruction, or realize that Israel’s only chance now to bring the war to an end is to destroy Hamas. Full stop.

[originally published in American Thinker]

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (54)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Fritz@Fritz·38w

    Expecting Hamas to abide by the so-called agreement calls to mind the fable of the scorpion and the frog, where the frog expected the scorpion not to sting it because it would lead them both to drown while crossing the stream. But the scorpion stings him anyway, because it is its nature.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    cdor@cdor·38w
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    The primary question to be asked is: did anyone think the ceasefire would bring an end to the war?

    Only a blind fool would have thought that this war would end without a clearly defined winner...and loser. My apologies to all the highly aware blind fools out there.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·38w
    ReplyingtoFritz

    Fritz (View Comment):

    Expecting Hamas to abide by the so-called agreement calls to mind the fable of the scorpion and the frog, where the frog expected the scorpion not to sting it because it would lead them both to drown while crossing the stream. But the scorpion stings him anyway, because it is its nature.

    An excellent analogy, Fritz. Thanks.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Charles Mark@CharlesMark·38w

    The greatest hope is that the regime in Iran falls, and the rest of the dominoes follow. Hamas will be very short of friends and finance the Middle East at least, if that happens.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·38w

    I would love for Iran to collapse, but I'm not so sure that others will not step in to help Hamas: Qatar, for one. They haven't established that they've fully rejected Hamas. Countries have been sending in money through intermediaries, and that could continue.

Scroll for later comments
+49 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 54 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •