Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I can understand how a genuine pacifist could so strongly deplore the inherent tragedy of war that the reasons for its prosecution are deemed unworthy and a generic sympathy for civilians caught in the middle is natural for all. What is harder to understand is how people purportedly motivated by such sentiments readily dismiss culpability for the horrific, inhumane acts of Oct 7 in which brutal civilian casualties were not incidental to a military objective but entirely intentional.
The woke moral framework is a strange beast.
Under the new order now oozing out of the moral open sewers that persist in calling themselves universities, only white people have agency and moral responsibility. And the new order is even retroactive. Columbus and Cortez, as white males, had to know that colonialism was wrong. In contrast, Montezuma, as ruler of an about-to-be oppressed people was not culpable for oppressing surrounding tribes and using them as slaves or human sacrifice. Similarly, Jews (officially white oppressors) should know better than to resist, much less cause any injury to victim people. Hamas (officially a non-white victim class) has no such moral awareness or responsibility
Islam promises an afterlife of sensual pleasures (at least for guys). Wokeslam promises that membership in a gnostic elite grants its members temporal freedom from the moral and social constraints of their heritage. The truly woke no longer have to listen to parental admonishments about deviant sexual practices, useless college majors or repugnant ideology because those parents are hopelessly tainted by the historic crimes of whiteness. Ozzie and Harriet might as well have owned slaves and personally shot a Cherokee child. They have no moral standing to impose all that traditional morals and family nonsense that is simply a deceptive form of cognitive bondage.
We need to grasp that under the new doctrine, human beings exist on two planes. There is the higher plane in which enlightened white people fight the evil white people who want to drag all white people down into the lower plane where their very presence disrupts native cultures, nature, and even the climate. The lower plane is the natural realm of victimized peoples. Their oppression is largely internalized and even in the unlikely event of its complete discontinuance, they can never get to the higher plane because as innocents they have no crimes to disavow.
Victimhood means perpetual dependence on the largesse of enlightened white people, like being a guilt-free Blanche Dubois ever dependent on the kindness of strangers. Kendi X’s vision of a supreme Panel of Experts to divvy up all wealth and resources without any checks and balances is almost a perfect projection of the new order—victims enjoying a perpetual stream of reparations and the illusion of power but with no actual ownership of the skills or specialized knowledge required to produce anything. [Presumably, there would need to be a national backroom with a disproportionate number of Asian and Jewish guys doing the actual calculations, planning, and production management because public schooling for black and other victim-class kids would continue to devolve into achievement-free victimhood training.]
In the perfect political incarnation of the new order, the still-systemically-oppressed-but-not-as-much-as-before victims would honor the good white people with their votes, gratitude, and admiration. The victim peoples would have lots of festivals, music, dances, and crafts within their plane that the enlightened white people (who have transcended their own culture) could benevolently visit and enjoy on weekends though without any appropriation.
That hierarchical arrangement is not slavery but a benevolent dependence in which positions and possessions are a gift from the higher plane. Substitute that arrangement for “slave” and John C. Calhoun would sound pretty woke:
But I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good - a positive good. - John C. Calhoun, speaking in the Senate in 1837
People in an actual national territory with actual national interests and actual citizen obligations with actual dangers from actual enemies is a dystopian nightmare for the truly woke. Wokedom can really only exist with physical safety, tenure, and a guaranteed income to support the illusion of moral transcendence. Being hauled down into being merely on one side when one’s country is threatened is more terrifying than whatever the nation's enemy might do. White people should never have to be on that lower plane where they have to struggle to exist as the lesser peoples do. It is tacky and uncool. That whole Israeli survival thing is offputting and just needs to stop. Why don't they get it?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (29)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
At one point in time, the nature of Israel’s treatment of people and the enemy was exceptionally different from how their enemies treated others that it was a beacon on a hill in the darkest night. Why are you different? Because God gave us another way to live.
And people from other nations would go through conversion - shaving the body, circumcision, and cleansing rites - just to be part of this nation so different from their own.
Yes, what was done to Israel is wrong. No one questions that. But that still doesn’t stop people from expecting that someone who truly has the higher ground would engage in war differently than their enemies.
Something about caring for the Palestinian children more than the children’s own people care about them should result in strong and radical conversion. Even if it costs some Israeli soldier lives.
That doesn’t mean there won’t be civilian casualties. But people would be far more forgiving if they saw Israeli forces willing to risk their lives to prevent collateral damage.
Do war differently than the enemy if you truly have more moral rectitude than the enemy.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The Israelis have done a far superior job of minimizing civilian casualties than did the USA in France in 1944 or in Iraq in the last decade. It matters not that the 30,000 figure is a lie because the woke zombie hordes refuse to accept that any response was justified. Whatever Israelis do short of national suicide is wrong.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
People will never see that. Because it's not reported.
That's the guiding principle of the Israeli military. But it doesn't matter.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
1944 was way in the past, and who will ever know the facts at this point.
But I strongly disagree with this characterization of the U.S. military and Central Command actions in Iraq.
I was immersed in following this war in the early 2000s, but I don't have time today to go back into it.
But I want to go on record as fiercely defending the work of the U.S. Central Command in Iraq to save lives and to help people as much as they could. All of the statistics that came out of that war were tainted by (a) the anti-Bush Democrats and Republicans and (b) the terrorist organizations, starting with Hamas and Hezbollah.
In so many ways, we are just continuing the public relations disaster that began in 2003.
I think Israel is the latest victim of this ongoing smear campaign against the United States.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Meanwhile, outfits like the appalling Amnesty International put out bilge like this:
The backstory?
This monster led a Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine group that abducted an Israeli soldier in 1984, gouged out his eyes, castrated him, and then shot him. He was serving a life sentence for his crimes.
So far (via Powerline), responses have mostly been in this vein:
The whole thing is disgustingly reminiscent of WaPo's fawning obituary for "austere religious scholar" Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Not sure what it's going to take to change the narrative.
You're seeing five of 29 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.