Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Double standard? What double standard? From Breitbart, "Report: Joe Biden to Escape Charges for Mishandling Classified Docs." As the report this week euphemistically puts it:
Special Counsel Robert Hur, who is investigating President Joe Biden for mishandling documents, is not expected to charge anyone, sources familiar with the matter told CNN and the Wall Street Journal. The report suggests a double standard of justice. While there will reportedly be no consequences for Biden, Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted former President Donald Trump in June for mishandling classified documents.
One might be excused for asking if this is a mere suggestion: how far do they have to go to finally qualify for "in-your-face, straight-up corruption?"
As others and I ask more and more lately, it is more and more of a legitimate question whether we can survive another year of this criminal enterprise.
Only Gomer would be surprised at this news; maybe he was a Democrat.
God Help us.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (9)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams, call your office.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Excellent. Thank you for these words from Mr. Adams; I quote them often and, considering what we are immersed in these days, they always bring a tear to my eye. I guess he would be cancelled and run out of town today for uttering such heresies.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Or they would just state that they don't want to be a moral/religious people any more, and therefore the Constitution must be replaced.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I'm going to (somewhat) disagree with is this recurring quote*: the Constitution was designed around the notion that people, by and large, are not as moral as we would like them to be. This was repeatedly made explicit within the Federalist Papers, and is why our Constitution emphasizes limited government and the separation of powers (and is in fact almost unique among national constitutions in that in elevates this vital concept beyond token window dressing). The fact that we are now a corrupt and degenerated society that has managed to override Constitutional safeguards does not mean, as this statement implies, that there are superior ways of preventing or operating within the cultural dystopia we live in; other systems would have simply accelerated the decades-long process, as was the case in Europe, and is why the Left spend so much time trying to corrupt and circumvent the Constitution, despite the risk that such tactics would expose their long march through the institutions in time to stop it.
If someone simply wants to make the case that we are well on the way toward destroying our Republic (along the lines that Ben Franklin warned us about), and that domination by an immoral and irreligious majority is the reason for this, and that we are likely incapable as a people of reversing the process in time to save the idea of 'America' without an almost unprecedented moral or religious Awakening , then have at it-in most respects, I agree with you....just don't mischaracterize the Constitution while doing so. I say this not only to defend the most important creation of the United States, but because its a misunderstanding that would negatively affect the success of anti-Left movements, as well as the long-term survival of any successes in that direction.
*I'm not trying to call anyone out, multiple people that I like and respect have been posting this quote; also, I greatly admire John Adams, but he is simply very very wrong in this instance.
Edit: saw your thread. Response there.
You're seeing five of nine comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.