3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Gomer Pyle: Call Your Office!
November 17, 2023 at 1:48 PM

Gomer Pyle: Call Your Office!

Jim George
@JimGeorge

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark24likesJoin to like9comments

Double standard? What double standard? From Breitbart, "Report: Joe Biden to Escape Charges for Mishandling Classified Docs." As the report this week euphemistically puts it:

Special Counsel Robert Hur, who is investigating President Joe Biden for mishandling documents, is not expected to charge anyone, sources familiar with the matter told CNN and the Wall Street Journal. The report suggests a double standard of justice. While there will reportedly be no consequences for Biden, Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted former President Donald Trump in June for mishandling classified documents.

One might be excused for asking if this is a mere suggestion: how far do they have to go to finally qualify for "in-your-face, straight-up corruption?"

As others and I ask more and more lately, it is more and more of a legitimate question whether we can survive another year of this criminal enterprise.

Only Gomer would be surprised at this news; maybe he was a Democrat.

God Help us.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (9)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Barfly@Barfly·2y

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams, call your office.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Jim George@JimGeorge·2y
    ReplyingtoBarfly

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams, call your office.

    Excellent. Thank you for these words from Mr. Adams; I quote them often and, considering what we are immersed in these days, they always bring a tear to my eye. I guess he would be cancelled and run out of town today for uttering such heresies.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y
    ReplyingtoJim George

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams, call your office.

    Jim George (View Comment):

    Excellent. Thank you for these words from Mr. Adams; I quote them often and, considering what we are immersed in these days, they always bring a tear to my eye. I guess he would be cancelled and run out of town today for uttering such heresies.

    Or they would just state that they don't want to be a moral/religious people any more, and therefore the Constitution must be replaced.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    lowtech redneck@lowtechredneck·2y
    ReplyingtoBarfly

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams, call your office.

    I'm going to (somewhat) disagree with is this recurring quote*: the Constitution was designed around the notion that people, by and large, are not as moral as we would like them to be. This was repeatedly made explicit within the Federalist Papers, and is why our Constitution emphasizes limited government and the separation of powers (and is in fact almost unique among national constitutions in that in elevates this vital concept beyond token window dressing). The fact that we are now a corrupt and degenerated society that has managed to override Constitutional safeguards does not mean, as this statement implies, that there are superior ways of preventing or operating within the cultural dystopia we live in; other systems would have simply accelerated the decades-long process, as was the case in Europe, and is why the Left spend so much time trying to corrupt and circumvent the Constitution, despite the risk that such tactics would expose their long march through the institutions in time to stop it.

    If someone simply wants to make the case that we are well on the way toward destroying our Republic (along the lines that Ben Franklin warned us about), and that domination by an immoral and irreligious majority is the reason for this, and that we are likely incapable as a people of reversing the process in time to save the idea of 'America' without an almost unprecedented moral or religious Awakening , then have at it-in most respects, I agree with you....just don't mischaracterize the Constitution while doing so. I say this not only to defend the most important creation of the United States, but because its a misunderstanding that would negatively affect the success of anti-Left movements, as well as the long-term survival of any successes in that direction.

    *I'm not trying to call anyone out, multiple people that I like and respect have been posting this quote; also, I greatly admire John Adams, but he is simply very very wrong in this instance.

  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y
    Replyingtolowtech redneck

    Barfly (View Comment):

    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams, call your office.

    lowtech redneck (View Comment):

    I’m going to (somewhat) disagree with is this recurring quote*: the Constitution was designed around the notion that people, by and large, are not as moral as we would like them to be. This was repeatedly made explicit within the Federalist Papers, and is why our Constitution emphasizes limited government and the separation of powers (and is in fact almost unique among national constitutions in that in elevates this vital concept beyond token window dressing). The fact that we are now a corrupt and degenerated society that has managed to override Constitutional safeguards does not mean, as this statement implies, that there are superior ways of preventing or operating within the cultural dystopia we live in; other systems would have simply accelerated the decades-long process, as was the case in Europe, and is why the Left spend so much time trying to corrupt and circumvent the Constitution, despite the risk that such tactics would expose their long march through the institutions in time to stop it.

    If someone simply wants to make the case that we are well on the way toward destroying our Republic (along the lines that Ben Franklin warned us about), and that domination by an immoral and irreligious majority is the reason for this, and that we are likely incapable as a people of reversing the process in time to save the idea of ‘America’ without an almost unprecedented moral or religious Awakening , then have at it-in most respects, I agree with you….just don’t mischaracterize the Constitution while doing so. I say this not only to defend the most important creation of the United States, but because its a misunderstanding that would negatively affect the success of anti-Left movements, as well as the long-term survival of any successes in that direction.

    *I’m not trying to call anyone out, multiple people that I like and respect have been posting this quote; also, I greatly admire John Adams, but he is simply very very wrong in this instance.

    Edit: saw your thread. Response there.

Scroll for later comments
+4 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of nine comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •