Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
It has often been remarked that women talk more than men do. Little girls tend to get verbal younger than boys. And women seem to use language, much more than men do, to build relationships.
Though academics, possibly driven by feminist concerns, insist this is not true.
But whether it is true or not, I have always found there is an irony: much of the important information that women share with each other is not spoken! For women, there is an entire world of what is understood, but is not said.
The Torah has this example. The text tells it better than I could summarize:
And the woman conceived, and bore a son: and when she saw that he was a goodly child, she hid him three months. And when she could not longer hide him, she took for him a box made of papyrus, and daubed it with slime and with pitch, and put the child in it; and she laid it in the rushes by the River’s brink. And his sister stood afar off, to know what would be done to him. And the daughter of Par῾o came down to wash herself at the River; and her maidens walked along by the River’s side; and when she saw the box among the rushes, she sent her maid to fetch it. And when she had opened it, she saw the child: and, behold, a weeping boy. And she had compassion on him, and said, This is one of the Hebrews’ children. Then said his sister to Par῾o’s daughter, Shall I go and call to thee a nurse of the Hebrew women, that she may nurse the child for thee? And Par῾o’s daughter said to her, Go. And the maid went and called the child’s mother. And Par῾o’s daughter said to her, Take this child away, and nurse it for me, and I will give thee thy wages. And the woman took the child, and nursed it. And the child grew, and she brought him to Par῾o’s daughter, and he became her son. And she called his name Moshe: and she said, Because I drew him out of the water.
There is an entire subtext here. There is no doubt that every single person in this story (except Moses himself) knew the score. There was a wink-and-nod understanding between all the characters in this story. But none of them say it. There is safety in plausible deniability.
But it also seems to me that this story only works with women in the story. Women are capable of have this kind of non-verbal understanding between the actors, without the reality ever actually surfacing to be openly acknowledged. I cannot imagine a similar situation playing out with men.
Am I alone in this?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (20)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Men have plenty of non-verbal communication too, it's just not identical to womens'. No surprise.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Agreed. No shortage of "strong, silent type" communications in sports and the military.
CONTRIBUTOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Oh, absolutely. The quantity of shared understanding communicated with the slightest of facial expressions or gestures is immense. There can be an entire short story in a clap on the back.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
What the heck, let's have a little Star Trek just for fun!
CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
This is an imaginative post, and true: there's unquestionably a greater social ability among women. Of course, none of this is totally unknown to groups of men either, in certain situations or roles that call for solidarity.
In a murder investigation in the old days of a generation or two ago, the guy who found the body, the priest who administered Last Rites posthumously, and the two cops at the scene were likely to look each other in the eye and tacitly agree not to mention a possible connection of the case to, say, prostitution or homosexuality. "Everybody knows", but everybody is tightlipped about it.
You're seeing five of 20 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.