Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Trump has nominated Kash Patel for FBI director. Wait a sec, isn't Christopher Wray still FBI director? He hasn't resigned or been fired yet, but it's now clear Wray should have his desk packed up by the close of business on January 19. Wray treated Trump, the man who appointed him, with utter contempt; now Trump is paying him back in spades, and I'm loving it. Wray has earned every bit of this treatment.
In positive signs for Patel's tenure, Morning Joe called him the "personification of MAGA rage." Even more important, the disgraced Andrew McCabe called him "profoundly unqualified," and Tom Nichols, a staff writer for the Atlantic magazine, slammed him as "as dangerous as it gets."
What are Patel's real qualifications or lack thereof? First, he understands the problem. He has called for the FBI headquarters to be closed and its 7000 staff located there to be sent out to be real cops. He has said that the FBI is too frickin' big. (Above quotes are from a FoxNews article.)
Second, he is loyal to Trump — obviously an important qualification for someone who will reform the FBI after a century or more of abuses. And especially important after the stunning attacks on Trump by both of his FBI directors.
But what of his actual skills? Interestingly the first nine years of his career were spent as a public defender. I like to see someone who has played on both sides of the ball because that gives a fuller appreciation of the law.
He has national security and intelligence experience, having served three years as a trial attorney in the DoJ's national security division and two years as senior counsel to the House Intelligence Committee. There he played a key role in investigating the Russia collusion hoax and working for Devin Nunes while investigating the FISA abuses.
He served as senior director for counterintelligence at the National Security Counsel and was principal deputy to Ric Grenell at the Office of National Intelligence. In the interregnum, he was an advisor to Trump on national security matters and strongly defended him in the classified documents case. He has a lot of the right experience in the intelligence, law enforcement, and national security fields.
His biggest weakness is that he hasn't had much experience administering a large bureaucracy — or any large organization. And he will face enormous, entrenched opposition. But he has worked in the DoJ and counterintelligence, so he at least understands how those organizations function. If he picks good deputies, this weakness will be manageable. There will be some difficulty in confirming such an obvious fighter who is committed to gutting the FBI; but as long as no more than four Republicans defect, Trump will be able to push him through.
I'm hopeful that he will be confirmed and cautiously optimistic that he will make important changes at the FBI. But given the magnitude of the task, it's too much to hope that he can totally root out the corruption and treason at the FBI.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (62)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Somehow the photo credit got cut out: From Epoch Times via Wikipedia. By KAPPPK - Own work, CC0,
commons.wikimedia.org
Open link
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It will not be easy for certain.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Oh, I don't know. I think that with a sustained, 4 year effort on his part, with the full support and cooperation of not just the President, but of his boss (AG Bondi) and his counterparts at DNI (Tulsi Gabbard), CIA (John Ratcliffe), NSA (Mike Waltz), and (also importantly) the incoming OMB Director (Russ Vought), there's a mighty good chance he'll get really close to accomplishing that. Furthermore, I suspect that there's a slew of rank-and-file who will finally be able to help clean out the Bureau, knowing that their doing so will be rewarded instead of punished.
Fingers crossed.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Couldn't get a better endorsement from the left . . .
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It took a bit of googling to find out, but I'm pretty sure now that Morning Joe is not the same as Joe Rogan. I already knew he wasn't Joe Biden, even though Joe Biden has the advantage (or disadvantage) that I'd be able to pick him out of a police lineup.
Other than that bit of confusion, it's a good article.
You're seeing five of 62 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.