Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Someone at the US Naval Academy thought it was appropriate to invite a lefty historian, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, who has been on news shows likening Trump to authoritarian dictators she has studied. The lecture was initially to be closed to the public. Academy grads and the Heritage Foundation pushed back and first got it opened to the public and then got her invitation revoked. Now the left has its panties in a wad and sees this as a window into an authoritarian America under Trump.
Why do they believe future officers should be exposed to all ideas, including Marxist ones? They even attack Heritage’s Project 2025 as an authoritarian playbook because it states service academy courses must be scrubbed of Marxist ideology and that service academy professors should not have tenure.
Why would service academy leadership believe it is healthy to teach future officers that their future commander-in-chief is an authoritarian leader? Are they planting the seeds for a military rebellion against Trump? How many Milleys and Vindmans are there? It is “the long march through the institutions” on full display. This warrants a congressional inquiry, but that would require a will on the part of Congress critters to push back.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (57)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
If interested, here is an article.
thebaltimorebanner.com
Open link
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The military services have had a good twenty-plus years since the enactment of the Patriot Act to identify and cleanse the military of those who would not take up arms against fellow Americans. I suspect there has been significant achievement of that objective.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Have you noticed a major campaign by the Democrat Leftist political campaign to attack Trump for his pointing out the Leftist enemy within America as the biggest threat to the American Republic? This identification of Trump's rhetoric as portending dictatorial leadership is the major campaign theme falsehood being doled out by the Democrats. They know if Trump is POTUS their run is over.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think tenure ought to be tossed out as a general principle, but in the service academies? Absolutely not.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Americans have the good fortune of already experiencing four high performance years of President Donald Trump followed by four disastrous years of Biden/Harris and Democrats. Now we get to choose.
You're seeing five of 57 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.