Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
The federal recognition of Juneteenth in 2021 provides a valuable opportunity to reflect on how slavery ended in the United States. Rather than treating June 19, 1865, as a self-contained endpoint, it can serve as an entry point into the longer, more complex story of emancipation. That story stretches from the political organizing of the 1850s through the Civil War to the constitutional abolition of slavery, and finally to the enforcement of that abolition in the Indian Territory. A narrow focus on Juneteenth alone, especially when presented without context, risks compressing a multifaceted historical process into a single celebratory date. The result can obscure important earlier steps and leave the impression that legal chattel slavery ended everywhere on one day in Texas.
The organized political effort to end slavery’s expansion took a decisive turn on March 20, 1854. In Ripon, Wisconsin, anti-slavery activists—primarily former Whigs, Free Soilers, and some Democrats—gathered to form what became the Republican Party. This meeting responded directly to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which had repealed the Missouri Compromise and opened western territories to slavery through popular sovereignty. The new party’s early platform opposed the further spread of slavery into federal territories. While not initially a party of immediate nationwide abolition, its formation created a viable national political vehicle for anti-slavery sentiment at a moment when the older party system was collapsing under the weight of the slavery issue. This 1854 development was not the first expression of opposition to slavery, but it marked the beginning of a sustained political movement capable of contesting national power.
That movement gained the presidency in 1860 with the election of Abraham Lincoln. Southern states responded with secession, and the ensuing Civil War transformed the conflict over slavery. What began as a war to preserve the Union evolved, through military necessity and moral pressure, into a war against slavery itself. The Emancipation Proclamation of January 1, 1863, declared freedom for enslaved people in areas still in rebellion. It was a wartime measure of limited immediate reach, yet it reframed the Union cause and opened the door for Black men to serve in the Union Army—nearly 180,000 of whom fought for the end of slavery. Their service added moral and practical force to the argument that the war must destroy the institution that had caused it.
The constitutional culmination of this struggle came with the 13th Amendment. Congress passed it in early 1865, and the required three-fourths of the states ratified it on December 6, 1865. The amendment declared that “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States.” This was the first time the Constitution explicitly abolished chattel slavery nationwide. It converted the wartime gains and political victories into permanent law. Ratification required political work in the states, including former Confederate states, as a condition of readmission. The 13th Amendment stands as the legal settlement of the long campaign against slavery.
Even after December 1865, however, legal chattel slavery persisted in one significant area. Members of the Five Civilized Tribes—Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole—in Indian Territory had practiced slavery for decades. The Cherokee had voluntarily freed their slaves in 1863, but the other tribes largely maintained the institution. The 13th Amendment applied to places under U.S. jurisdiction, yet the tribes’ treaty-based semi-sovereignty meant additional federal action was required. Between July and August 1866, the United States negotiated new treaties with each of the Five Tribes. These Reconstruction Treaties required the tribes to abolish slavery and addressed the status and rights of Freedmen. Slavery in Indian Territory ended legally, therefore, only after the 1866 agreements. The final chapter of chattel slavery under U.S. authority closed not in Texas in June 1865, nor even with the 13th Amendment alone, but through this last round of treaty enforcement.
Juneteenth commemorates a specific and meaningful moment within this longer arc. On June 19, 1865, Union General Gordon Granger arrived in Galveston, Texas, and issued General Order No. 3, informing enslaved people in that state—roughly 250,000 of them—that they were free. Texas had been one of the last Confederate strongholds to receive the news. For those who heard it that day, the announcement represented the lived experience of emancipation after years of uncertainty. Celebrations began almost immediately and continued in Black communities for generations. The date carries genuine cultural weight because it marks when freedom finally reached a large population that had been deliberately kept uninformed after Appomattox.
Yet Juneteenth was never the absolute last day of legal slavery in the United States. Some Black people remained enslaved by members of the Five Civilized Tribes until the 1866 treaties. Presenting Juneteenth in isolation, without the surrounding context, can create the misleading impression that emancipation was complete once the news reached Texas. That framing does a disservice to historical accuracy and to the memory of those still held in bondage after June 19, 1865. It also understates the political and constitutional work that made emancipation possible in the first place.
The full history—from the 1854 meeting in Ripon, through the Civil War and the Emancipation Proclamation, to the 13th Amendment’s ratification and the 1866 treaties—reveals a process that combined moral agitation, political organization, military conflict, constitutional change, and final enforcement. No single date captures every dimension. The 1854 party formation represents the start of effective national political opposition to slavery’s expansion. The war and the Proclamation represent the military and executive turning points. The 13th Amendment represents the constitutional victory. The 1866 treaties represent the last legal closure. Juneteenth represents the experiential arrival of freedom for a major population.
A richer approach to Juneteenth would use the day to introduce this entire sequence rather than isolate a lone announcement. Accurate education about how slavery ended strengthens public understanding. It shows that political action, including the formation of an anti-slavery party in 1854, mattered. It shows that the war became a war of liberation. It shows that the constitutional amendment provided permanence. And it shows that even after these steps, additional work was required to finish the task in Indian Territory. This fuller narrative honors the complexity of the struggle and the contributions of many different actors without reducing the story to any one moment or location.
Juneteenth deserves recognition for what it commemorates. At the same time, treating it as a self-sufficient symbol of emancipation’s completion flattens the historical record. The recognition of the holiday can instead become an occasion to recover the longer journey—from the political meeting in Ripon, Wisconsin, through the war, the amendment, and the final treaties—that finally made Black chattel slavery illegal throughout the United States. That complete story is worth telling on Juneteenth and throughout the year.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (17)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Excellent. I had known freed slaves and free blacks had served in the Union forces, but had no idea the number was as high as 180,000!
Thanks.
CONTRIBUTOR • CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I didn't know much about this, and what little I learned in school I'd forgotten. Good post, thanks!
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Maybe now I can post a comment. It won't be as long as my first try.
I was discussing this with my wife the other morning. (Translation: I was ranting.)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Although I was initially in favor of the Juneteenth holiday, I’ve grown less so over the past seven years. I do appreciate @PostalSage’s thoughtful introduction to the topic of slavery, and that its place in American history is far more complex than most of us are aware of.
In 1787, all of the several States agreed to give the central government (then functioning under the 1777 Articles of Confederation ) the power to restrict and prohibit the expansion of slavery in Federal territories. The subsequent Constitution of 1787 was deliberately ambiguous regarding slavery, but it did include a specific proscription to end American participation in the international slave trade after 1808 (U.S. Constitution Art. I, Sec. 9, Cl. 1).
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
In 1776 the Declaration of Independence said that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.” Even this famous sentence was modified from "life, liberty, and property" to exclude the idea that humans could be property.
The Quakers began organized protesting of slavery in 1688.
You're seeing five of 17 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.