Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
C.A. Skeet has an article over at PJ Media, commenting on the UK's totalitarian turn.
What caught my eye in particular was this comment:
"The dictatorial drive being pursued by the British ruling class doesn't fall neatly into a category that Hannah Arendt would recognize as totalitarian. This is because none of the typical totalitarian movements (communism, socialism, fascism, Nazism, and Islamism) are suicidal in nature. Meaning, each of these movements attempts to use the state to strengthen the ideology, or to use the ideology to strengthen the state."
What seems to be happening in Britain, as well as the West in general, is the emergence of modern Cathari. This was a medieval, Gnostic sect that typically frowned on reproduction. Humanity, as part of the physical world, was seen as an abomination.
Per Wikipedia (I know, not always a reliable source, but useful here):
Followers were known as Cathars or Albigensians, (after the French city Albi where the movement first took hold), but referred to themselves as Good Christians. They famously believed that there were not one, but two Gods—the good God of Heaven and the evil god of this age (2 Corinthians 4:4). According to tradition, Cathars believed that the good God was the God of the New Testament faith and creator of the spiritual realm; many Cathars identified the evil god as Satan, the master of the physical world. The Cathars believed that human souls were the sexless spirits of angels trapped in the material realm of the evil god. They thought these souls were destined to be reincarnated until they achieved salvation through the "consolamentum," a form of baptism performed when death is imminent. At that moment, they believed they would return to the good God as "Cathar Perfect." Catharism was initially taught by ascetic leaders who set few guidelines, leading some Catharist practices and beliefs to vary by region and over time.
Although our current Western totalitarians are seeking utopia-like socialists of the past, where they differ is that past totalitarians wanted to build a physical utopia in this world, starting with their own societies. Our current crop of totalitarians, like the Cathars, instead seek a utopia of self-negation; Western Civilization is evil for failing to achieve socialist utopia, so should therefore be destroyed for this fundamental moral corruption.
Our modern totalitarians seem suicidal...because they are. Civilizational suicide is the whole point. They may couch it in rhetoric about "social justice" and this or that do-gooder policy, but ultimately they seek to cleanse the world of their own civilization's existence.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (6)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That makes zero sense to me.
But I don't have a better explanation for the actions of the left. So heck, maybe you're right.
If so, Lord help us...
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The requirement to "make sense" is symptomatic of our civilization's corruption, an indication of why we must die for the sake of the utopian vision.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
"Making sense" is white supremacy, and apparently must be stamped out.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The correct method of rebellion is to religiously attend services, marry young, make many babies, have fun raising them, and imbue them with the same infectious joie de vivre, and stay married. The best revenge is living well.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
“…ultimately they seek to cleanse the world of their own civilization’s existence.”
Exactly!!!
You're seeing five of six comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.