Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I kid you not. I read this piece by @MattShumer, and here is my thinking:
First, I now understand that AI (whether right now, or within the next year) can do anything, as long as it can get to the thing it wants to change. It can crack any encryption, break any firewall, impersonate anyone or anything. It does this with little or no input from a person.
Second: AI has no moral code, but that does not stop it from acting. So if the AI believes that Trump is Hitler, then it could justify doing anything to kill Trump. If someone feels the same way about the head of their HOA, then they could get an AI to pester the homeowner, shut down their car in dangerous circumstances in traffic (or even deliberately have the car ram a brick wall), empty their bank account, bully them and their children online, flag them to the IRS, publish their whereabouts and activities, change the drug distributions while on IVs in the hospital, or countless other ways to destroy people.
All of the above are entirely feasible. It used to be that someone had to put real effort into harming someone else – but with AI’s “help,” it could be nothing more than a passing idea caused by a momentary grudge. Or the AI might decide, on its very own, to improve its world by ending all those who drive 2023 Mazdas or who write anti-AI screeds on the internet. Whoops.
We cannot impose a morality on AI (since bad actors want immoral AI, and AI can rewrite itself). We cannot stop AI’s progression (too many states and actors). We cannot simply ask people who love to troll online to “play nice” when given the opportunity to anonymously harm or endanger the people they do not like that day.
The only solution I can think of is a very bad one: quarantine all safety systems from the internet. Some of this (commercial aerospace) is already pretty well insulated. But we would need to add all power plants, hospitals, water and sewage systems, and energy distribution systems. Cars, too – after years of getting them all connected, it is a certainty that AI will be able to kill people who are just driving down the highway.
But what about banks?! Online bill paying… I truly don’t see how or where it ends.
The only flaw I see in the above logic is whether, in fact, AI will be able to do all that. Go ahead – read that Shumer piece. And tell me I am wrong.
Please.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (20)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Peculiarly, there is a democratizing factor. The power to destroy with AI will not reside solely with those who have great power – governments or mega-corporations. Instead, anyone – including the Ais themselves – will be able to lay waste.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
God is smarter than AI and will deal with it.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Insecure systems should not be on public networks; if you are going to expose a system to a public network it should be secure. This was true when the potential attackers were scammers, terrorists, organized crime and foreign governments, and it’s still true.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
My point is that with AI computational power, there's no such thing as a secure system that's connected to a network.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think not. Not without human action he won’t. He didn’t deal with Genghis Khan, or Hitler, or Mao or cancer all by Himself. Neither will He deal with AI. He’ll help us. But it’s up to us.
You're seeing five of 20 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.