The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightFederalist Radio HourDaily SignalThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnCall Me Back - with Dan SenorConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenHeritage ExplainsThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?Hillsdale DialoguesThe Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. The Lady Has Guts
October 29, 2026 at 4:54 PM

The Lady Has Guts

NT
Nanocelt TheContrarian
@NanoceltTheContrarian

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark12likesJoin to like8comments

The title was a description historically applied to Jane Byrne in Chicago. Byrne had been fired from her position with the city government by Michael Bilandic, successor to the legendary mayor Richard J. Daley. She then ran against Bilandic in the Democratic primary at the next mayoral election. Byrne had been a Daley acolyte, but following her firing she ran against the Daley machine, a seemingly foolhardy move for a Democratic candidate. Bilandic was the machine candidate. Byrne was given little chance of unseating him. With out-of-state progressive money, an astute campaign manager, an act of God (the January 1979 Blizzard, the response to which by the Bilandic administration convinced Chicagoans that he was incompetent), and an endorsement by Jesse Jackson, she narrowly prevailed. She beat the machine. The lady did have guts—and brains and a little luck. However, she managed only one term, losing the next primary to Harold Washington in a three-way race with Richard Daley fils.

In my view, the gutsy descriptor fits another female politician better, namely Maria Corina Machado of Venezuela. She has now returned to Venezuela at great risk to herself, but to the enthusiastic acclaim of her supporters. The opposition party she led won the last election in an overwhelming victory with a surrogate candidate, as she was barred from running. But Maduro refused to acknowledge that victory and remained in power. Machado has spent decades opposing the Chavista regime and Maduro. All at great risk. She has been in hiding and in exile. The government she opposes is utterly corrupt, as she, her fellow Venezuelans, and the whole world know. She remains in danger, but is more of an iron lady than even Thatcher, having to deal with thugs, criminals, murderers, and drug traffickers as her political opponents.

Following Maduro's removal, the Trump administration has given the cold shoulder to Machado. The reasons are unclear. Perhaps he is miffed that she, not he, has won the Nobel Peace Prize. Rubio has been supportive, but has been hampered by a president who doesn't seem to like Machado. Trump claims Delcy Rodriguez, second-in-command to Maduro, now running the country, is the popular leader of the nation. Her favorability stands at 3%.

Trump has also arranged for Alejandro Betancourt Lopez to run the country's oil industry. Betancourt has been accused by a Swiss court of money laundering and had a warrant for his arrest and extradition that was finessed by the US government and withdrawn by Switzerland so he could return to Venezuela to run the oil industry at Trump's behest. Betancourt is corrupt and a strange bedfellow. Perhaps Trump thinks he can control him due to his potential criminal status in Europe (e.g., he needs Trump, at least as long as Trump is president).

Trump's oil deal with Venezuela involves an account in a New York bank that accepts the oil revenues and disperses funds to Venezuela. The deal seems murky to me. Who controls those accounts is not clear. Hopefully not Betancourt. Does Trump control the account? Directly? Indirectly? This arrangement looks like it gives Trump de facto—if not direct—control of Venezuela's oil resources.

If Machado were to win a presidential election, that would change this type of circumstance and, given Machado's history, she would very likely try to run a legitimate government with private contracting for oil extraction and be far more transparent about the oil resources and finances, which seems distinctly unlikely under the current arrangement with Betancourt.

So I suspect this accounts for Trump ill-considered treatment of Machado. It seems that Machado is fighting both Venezuela's corrupt and murderous regime along with a less-than-transparent American administration that doesn't want her upsetting the Venezuelan apple (oil) cart. She has a tough row to hoe. I for one wish her all the best and am waiting with bated breath to see if she can force an election and win. I don't see any eventuality more beneficial for Venezuela. Trump should be backing her to the hilt, but he seems to have other interests that are impeding that support. Not good in my book.

Promoted by an EditorThis post was promoted to the Main Feed by an editor.

Discussion (8)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • MODERATOR • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Randy Weivoda@RandyWeivoda·23h

    Once upon a time, Romania was ruled by the evil Nicolae Ceaușescu and his possibly even more evil wife, Elena. They were widely hated by the Romanian people, but there was no chance of being overthrown, since Romania's communist government had the backing of the Soviet Union. When the Soviet empire collapsed and could no longer back up the Romanian communists, the people overthrew the government and executed the Ceaușescus.

    Perhaps the communist regime of Venezuela can be counted on to dance to Trump's tune. You give me the oil or whatever else I demand, and I will keep you in power as long as possible.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Just Yarob@Yarob·23h

    Trump corruptly colluding with crooks and money-launderers and fraudsters (and genocidal despots, don't forget) and illegally stashing Venezuelan money in secret offshore bank accounts outside the purview of the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

    Just another article of impeachment, I suppose. Is anyone keeping count?

  • NT

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Nanocelt TheContrarian@NanoceltTheContrarian·22h
    ReplyingtoJust Yarob

    Just Yarob (View Comment):

    Trump corruptly colluding with crooks and money-launderers and fraudsters (and genocidal despots, don't forget) and illegally stashing Venezuelan money in secret offshore bank accounts outside the purview of the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

    Just another article of impeachment, I suppose. Is anyone keeping count?

    I don’t think those accounts are outside the purview of the US Treasury, but the details on how those accounts are managed don’t seem to be readily available. I can’t say they are being corruptly managed but the circumstances don’t breed confidence.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Seward@StevenSeward·13h
    ReplyingtoNanocelt TheContrarian

    Just Yarob (View Comment):

    Trump corruptly colluding with crooks and money-launderers and fraudsters (and genocidal despots, don't forget) and illegally stashing Venezuelan money in secret offshore bank accounts outside the purview of the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

    Just another article of impeachment, I suppose. Is anyone keeping count?

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    I don’t think those accounts are outside the purview of the US Treasury, but the details on how those accounts are managed don’t seem to be readily available. I can’t say they are being corruptly managed but the circumstances don’t breed confidence.

    The Venezuelan accounts were put off-shore not to keep them from the purview of the U.S. Government, but to keep the money out of the hands of American oil companies who want to claim legal damages from Venezuela for nationalizing (or stealing) their businesses in 1976. If the funds had been put in the U.S. Treasury, the American oil companies could have sued to get their damages from the funds.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Steven Seward@StevenSeward·13h
    ReplyingtoNanocelt TheContrarian

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Comment):

    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Post):

    The Trump administration, after removing Maduro, has given a cold shoulder to Machado, for unclear reasons. Perhaps he is miffed that she, not he, has won the Nobel Peace Prize. Rubio has been supportive, but has been hampered by a President who doesn't seem to like Machado. Trump claims Delcy Rodriguez, second in command to Maduro,now running the country is the popular leader of the nation. Her favorability stands at 3%. Why Trump is blowing such smoke is far from clear.

    I think the reason is that Trump only respects power. He has no moral scruples that makes him side with democracies over dictators, he only cares about who has the most power. The fact that Maria Muchado was fairly elected holds no admiration for him whatsoever. That's why he allies himself with Putin, Xi, and the fat Kim Dong Gone, and disparages all the democratically elected leaders of the world. Unfortunately, this lady is not going to get an ounce of help from Trump.

+3 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of eight comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •