The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP Culture3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightFederalist Radio HourGiving VenturesWho Funds that?Daily SignalHillsdale DialoguesCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHeritage ExplainsThe Erick Erickson ShowThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Back of the BookMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesThe Learning CurveNot Dead YetFirst Things PodcastThe Conservative Woman’s GuideThe Glenn ShowLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Become a member.Become a Ricochet member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Banana Republic Status Confirmed
October 26, 2026 at 11:32 AM

Banana Republic Status Confirmed

Nanocelt TheContrarian
@NanoceltTheContrarian

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark17likesJoin to like10comments

Luiz Inácio “Lula” da Silva won another election in Brazil. It does appear that he cheated. He may not have needed to cheat to win, but cheat he did. Can't have a banana republic if you don't cheat in elections.

How'd he do it? He complained that there were not enough buses deployed to ferry his constituents to the polls in the Northeast of Brazil (Bahia), Lula's stronghold due to its poverty relative to the rest of Brazil (Northeast Brazil at one time in the 16th century). When the Dutch controlled Recife, it was one of the greatest wealth-producing enclaves on earth thanks to the sugar trade, with Pernambuco at its center. But Brazil's sugar industry in the northeast collapsed when the Portuguese ousted the Dutch from the region. The Dutch proceeded to establish the sugar trade in the West Indies and destroyed the Brazilian sugar trade, and that region of Brazil became the most impoverished.)

Lula got one of the Supreme Federal Court judges to extend voting time by 2 hours. This was done after the official 5 PM poll closure. In the rest of Brazil, the polls closed at the set time. In Bahia, the polls did not close, pending the decision by the federal judge, and then continued to accept votes for the next two hours. The polling places that had indeed closed at the designated time were, for procedural reasons, kept closed. Voting throughout Brazil ceased at 5 PM except in Bahia, where polling stations continued open for another 2 hours.

So in Lula's greatest stronghold, but nowhere else in Brazil, voters were allowed to vote beyond the deadline. This had to have been a planned maneuver; otherwise the polls in Bahia would have been closed and unable to reopen, but those polls never did shut down at the appointed time, and were the only ones that did not shut down. It's reasonable to suppose that by the time the polls closed, Lula's party would have known how many votes were needed to win, making it hard to believe the procedure was not in place before the vote.

Furthermore, Lula sought this ploy of extended hours in the last national election, but was not allowed. He won anyway.

Before the last election, after Lula was convicted of corruption and jailed, a single judge overturned his conviction on a technicality with no further attempt to adjudicate his case. He was freed and allowed to run again for president. He then defeated Jair Bolsonaro—père to Flávio, Lula's 2026 opponent—to obtain his current office.

Lula has achieved something never before achieved in Brazilian history. Namely, he has won the general election after coming in second in the primary election. Surprise! Surprise!

So Brazil won't be joining the conservative wave in South America (Colombia, Chile, Bolivia, Argentina, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru). It will become a more socialist country, headed by a man proven to be corrupt. One can say that Brazil has voted for corruption.

This seems familiar to me, as a resident of Georgia, where some strongly Democratic jurisdictions allow more days of early voting than other jurisdictions, and where mail-in ballots in Fulton County were opened and counted with no observers present before Election Day and where ballot tallies went missing in large numbers. (This is banned by state law but waved by the hapless Raffensperger, who just lost the primary in his Republican bid for the gubernatorial nomination.)

It may sound familiar to Californians, as the Golden State has no means of verifying citizenship—obviously a system set up intentionally to allow noncitizen voting—and, despite 20,000 noncitizens registered to vote in LA, the city and the state are not cooperating with DOJ efforts to ensure that noncitizens don't vote. This is a power that fully belongs, constitutionally, to the DOJ in federal elections, and it is an insult to ordinary human intelligence that Democrats rant against the DOJ for its efforts to ensure legitimate federal elections while demanding that we believe that federal elections in America are legitimate.

As Joe Biden would say, and he would know: "Malarkey!"

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (10)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Lord Rabbit von Hasenpfeffer@ape2ag·1d

    It was fascinating how US news organizations had stories ready to go within a couple of hours, "Congrats to Lula. Here is how he did it. Totally legitimately, we promise."

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    John H.@JohnH·1d

    Minor point: northeast Brazil, in 1986 when I first saw it, and as late as 2010 which I think was my last visit to the area, had vast acreage devoted to sugarcane.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·1d
    Edited
    Nanocelt TheContrarian (View Post):

    (a power that fully belongs, constitutionally, to the DOJ in federal elections)

    Remember that when the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were adopted, neither the President nor the Senators were elected by statewide popular vote. Since House members are elected by the popular votes of state citizens residing in defined congressional districts, this meant there was no such thing as a statewide popular vote involved in elections involving federal offices. Th is is the basis for the claims being made that the federal government should stay out of these election issues.

    But the 17th Amendment calling for a statewide vote for Senators and actions by state legislatures delegating the Electoral College certification process to parties other than the Legislators, a statewide electoral vote is used to determine which electors to certify for President.

    These actions open the door for election cheating and, in particular, make such easy in urban area big cities with one-party domination. So, it's not difficult to understand why we are where we are.

    The federal government does have a Constitutional responsibility to insure each state maintains a republican form of government. Actions by the federal government to insure votes are by citizens and properly counted appear to be appropriate to counter the obvious cheating.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (Here.We.Go.)@DonG·1d

    Which has the most corrupt election process: Brazil, California, or Alaska?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Fritz@Fritz·22h
    Edited

    I have seen it reported that the judge who ordered those polls in Lula strongholds to stay open 2 extra hours previously served as Lula's personal attorney.

    I'll take "Things that make you go, 'Hmmmmm'" for $400, Alex.

+5 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of ten comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •