3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Perhaps John Adams was Mistaken
July 28, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Perhaps John Adams was Mistaken

Dr. Bastiat
@drbastiat

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark36likesJoin to like29comments
Photo ID: 1439792717, From Grossinger, via Shutterstock

John Adams famously said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” I think Mr. Adams may have been at least partially mistaken about this. I view Mr. Adams as one of the great minds of his era, so I hesitate to disagree with him on something about which he gave a great deal of thought. But hear me out, and see if you think that I might have a point.

Over the last few decades, I’ve watched the left move further and further left. The “do whatever feels good” hippies of the 1970s went through an anti-establishment phase, but they eventually grew up and got jobs and families and minivans. But today’s leftists are anti-American radicals who seek to “fundamentally transform” America via the complete destruction of the ideas, traditions, and ethics that made America the greatest country the world has ever seen.

As the radical left has gone from being a fringe movement to being one of our two political parties, America has become home to two groups of people, both of whom absolutely refuse to live by the policies and ideas of the other. So elections are no longer opportunities to sort out disagreements about highway funding, Post Office subsidies, or other mundane matters. Now, every election is a final battle to save democracy from Republicans, or to save the planet from capitalists, or save the children from some other cataclysmic event. I’m not sure that democracy works in this environment.

From Wikimedia Commons

Only if we essentially agree on basic principles are we able to work out our differences on lesser matters via debates, elections, and free speech. If you openly hate your political adversaries and view them as fundamentally evil, then why would you negotiate with such scum? The only solution, in that circumstance, is complete destruction of your adversary, through any means necessary.

The tactics of the left, from the violence of Black Lives Matter, to the partisan attacks of the Justice system under Biden, to election fraud, to importing a new Democrat voting base via open borders, and so on – those tactics may seem distasteful to Americans who value our Constitution as John Adams did. But to a modern Democrat, those tactics are perfectly reasonable. What would you not do, in the battle against pure evil?

Which has led me to wonder whether a Constitutional republic can work in modern America. How could it possibly work, if half the population views that Constitution as somewhere between illegitimate and evil?

Photo ID: 1733332373. From Brett Welcher, via Shutterstock

My version of Mr. Adams’ quote might read something like, “Our Constitution was made only for a group of people who pretty much agree on most things. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

I like his quote better. But I think my version may be more applicable to modern America.

Heaven help us.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (29)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·2y

    I think Adams has it exactly right. We live in a country divided between those led by people who believe human beings have souls and there is a Supreme Being and those on the Left led by people who do not believe there is a Supreme Being or objective morality. Our Constitution works for those who believe in God and fails for those who are non-believers in God and morality.

    Have you not observed that our Leftist leaders don't reference the Constitution except under duress or when it just happens to conveniently support their current cause?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Scott Wilmot@ScottWilmot·2y
    Dr. Bastiat (View Post):

    Only if we essentially agree on basic principles are we able to work out our differences on lesser matters via debates, elections, and free speech. If you openly hate your political adversaries and view them as fundamentally evil, then why would you negotiate with such scum? The only solution, in that circumstance, is complete destruction of your adversary, through any means necessary.

    I’m a one-trick-pony on this but when the Left’s raison d’etre is abortion, one can’t work out differences; there is no “common ground”. They absolutely disavow the belief that one of our unalienable rights is the right to life.

    Dr. Bastiat (View Post):

    The tactics of the left, from the violence of Black Lives Matter, to the partisan attacks of the Justice system under Biden, to election fraud, to importing a new Democrat voting base via open borders, and so on – those tactics may seem distasteful to Americans who value our Constitution like John Adams did. But to a modern Democrat, those tactics are perfectly reasonable. What would you not do, in the battle against pure evil?

    Which has led me to wonder whether a Constitutional republic can work in modern America. How could it possibly work, if half the population views that Constitution as somewhere between illegitimate and evil?

    Well, this is very simplistic of me, but Mr. Adams would see that half of the citizenry as amoral and non-religious and would therefor agree that it can’t work with people like that. Mr. Adams is not mistaken, it is just that a great number of the citizenry have revolted against reason - they’ve lost their minds.

    Dr. Bastiat (View Post):

    Heaven help us.

    Amen.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Django@Django·2y

    The left/progressives can't or won't distinguish between want and a need. After all, if you want if badly enough, it becomes a need because if you don't get it, your mental health will be impaired. A "need" is only a half-step away from being a positive right for which successful people are obligated to pay through confiscatory taxes.

    Remember, if things truly can't go on this way, they won't.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y
    ReplyingtoDjango

    Django (View Comment):

    The left/progressives can’t or won’t distinguish between want and a need. After all, if you want if badly enough, it becomes a need because if you don’t get it, your mental health will be impaired. A “need” is only a half-step away from being a positive right for which successful people are obligated to pay through confiscatory taxes.

    Remember, if things truly can’t go on this way, they won’t.

    But of course, just because something can't go on forever doesn't mean it can't go on for decades, or even centuries.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    RufusRJones@RufusRJones·2y
    Dr. Bastiat (View Post):
    Only if we essentially agree on basic principles

    Inflation is not in the Constitution. There is no equal benefit from it. They don't really equalize it for it. Then people whine about the debt to GDP. Now, literally, the fractional reserve banking system is falling apart.

    Inflation is stealing. We may need to do this, but they don't make the whole system work. Now it's going to fall apart. Do you think people are going to vote Republican or Democrat after that?

    Government Is How We Steal From Each Other™

    The Ludwig von Mises Institute Is Right About Everything™

    Better Living Through Asset Bubbles™

    The Government Is Running Out Of Money™

Scroll for later comments
+24 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 29 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •