Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Thirty-five days ago, regime collapse was conspicuously (and wisely) not articulated as a military objective. If it happened, great, but if it didn’t, so be it.
Conventional wisdom and history said you can’t achieve regime collapse solely from bombing.
If Iran were to be the exception, the reason had to be a popular uprising.
Thirty-five days ago, the importance of the military objectives alone justified taking military action. Iran’s response to its defeat in the Twelve-Day War made this action inevitable. Iran doubled down on building offensive missiles. The nuclear work would continue, but first an intimidating conventional missile force would be produced. Israel’s Iron Dome was good, but it could be overcome by overwhelming numbers of missiles being fired simultaneously. Iron Dome’s anti-missile missiles are incredibly precise and agile, but also expensive. Iran’s missiles are crude, less accurate, but relatively cheap.
Militarily, everything has gone well — better than well — for 35 days.
The uprising has not occurred — yet. Maybe it will, maybe not. The possibility that it wouldn’t was always part of the plan.
What was not part of the plan was the reaction of Democrats, Europe, and the press. In a word, the reaction of the “Left.” For decades, the Left joined the consensus in condemning Iran and in proclaiming that Iran should never get a nuclear weapon. Now, on the very first day of a serious action to deny Iran a nuclear weapon, the Left condemned Trump and Israel and started cheerleading for Iran.
Today, if America and Israel were to declare victory and quit bombing, any objective assessment of the last 35 days would agree that they were indeed victorious. The Left, however, would proclaim it to be a humiliating, expensive, wasteful defeat.
The consequence would be this: Iran learns they can build back with impunity, and Israel learns they are one American election away from being abandoned.
The original plan did not include the destruction of bridges, power plants, and industrial infrastructure. If that occurs, it will be solely because the Left raised the stakes.
G-Pub
PS: The Left is not acting solely from TDS. They are motivated also by ADS (America Derangement Syndrome) and IDS (Israel Derangement Syndrome, commonly known as anti-semitism). Letting them off the hook by saying they only hate Trump is far too kind. They Hate America. And, They Hate Jews.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (36)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I expect Israel knows and has known since Obama that they are one election away from overt action against their State, not just passive abandonment. It’s never been generally loved. I guess it’s been inevitable that the nomenklatura would begin to aggressively endorse Iran and its theocratic regime. Europe certainly has had a vested interest in Iran’s ability to keep sending them oil. The US team just wants first, Trump gone, he and his family and friends destroyed and then the ultimate dismantling of the US Republic. They will never stop pushing. It’s discouraging that so many congressional “Republicans” don’t accept that the threat is real and imminent and there are actions ongoing to keep it moving ahead. None of this is just an academic exercise - the totalitarian left means it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
“The original plan did not include the destruction of bridges, power plants, and industrial infrastructure. If that occurs, it will be solely because the Left raised the stakes”
I think this is incorrect. Disruption of transportation networks is surely a potential course of action. Power stations can be crippled with special ordnance, first used against Iraq in 2003.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Top generals don't usually get fired when things are going well.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I don't know why anybody would be surprised by that. The Left hates everything Trump does. This should go without saying. If Trump didn't plan for that, he is naive.
I don't know why criticism by people in newspapers or online blogs would affect Donald Trump's military strategy. He ignores all criticism and openly disdains it. People on the Left are not causing him to bomb bridges and power plants.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
No, it will because the Iranian government was more resilient than expected. I didn't expect their government to survive this long , either.
You're seeing five of 36 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.