3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Time for the Jacksonian Response?
February 9, 2025 at 4:30 PM

Time for the Jacksonian Response?

Bob Thompson
@BobThompson

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark18likesJoin to like216comments

I thought we would soon see this, this material from a RedState article.

A federal judge issued an order Saturday that purports to not only stop the US DOGE Service, which is part of the Executive Office of the President, from accessing data on federal payments, but also prohibits Treasury officials from accessing the system managed by that agency. Buying into a tenuous — one might say bull**** — claim of "irreparable harm," a leftist Obama appointee serving in the Southern District of New York blocked access to Treasury systems and demanded Trump's audit team "immediately destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department’s records and systems, if any.”

Is there any supervision at all of the federal court system?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (216)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·1y

    Sounds like the court order interferes with the President's Constitutional authority.

    What standing does the NY AG have in this matter. Is she going to suffer "irreparable harm"? Maybe! Let's hope so!

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Hoyacon@Hoyacon·1y
    Bob Thompson (View Post):
    Is there any supervision at all of the federal court system?

    As you’ve probably figured, no. Unfortunately, one of the skillsets in the “practice of law” is forum shopping for just the right District Court judge.

    However, upon reading this, I did wonder what the conservative reaction to some of this data mining would be had Biden done it.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·1y
    ReplyingtoHoyacon

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    However, upon reading this, I did wonder what the conservative reaction to some of this data mining would be had Biden done it.

    Is there any data accumulated within the Executive Branch that is not accessible to the President?

    How would the court order be enforced? @Hoyacon

  • CONTRIBUTOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Seawriter@Seawriter·1y
    ReplyingtoBob Thompson

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    However, upon reading this, I did wonder what the conservative reaction to some of this data mining would be had Biden done it.

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Is there any data accumulated within the Executive Branch that is not accessible to the President?

    It is supposed to be. Except in the fever dreams of Federal Circuit Court judges, I guess.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Hoyacon@Hoyacon·1y
    ReplyingtoBob Thompson

    Hoyacon (View Comment):

    However, upon reading this, I did wonder what the conservative reaction to some of this data mining would be had Biden done it.

    Bob Thompson (View Comment):

    Is there any data accumulated within the Executive Branch that is not accessible to the President?

    That’s one way to phrase it, and I do not know the answer but would say “no.”The other way to look at it would be to ask if there is any data that should not be be accessed by the President as a matter of principle. Tax returns?

Scroll for later comments
+211 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 216 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •