Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
I thought we would soon see this, this material from a RedState article.
A federal judge issued an order Saturday that purports to not only stop the US DOGE Service, which is part of the Executive Office of the President, from accessing data on federal payments, but also prohibits Treasury officials from accessing the system managed by that agency. Buying into a tenuous — one might say bull**** — claim of "irreparable harm," a leftist Obama appointee serving in the Southern District of New York blocked access to Treasury systems and demanded Trump's audit team "immediately destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department’s records and systems, if any.”
Is there any supervision at all of the federal court system?
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (216)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Sounds like the court order interferes with the President's Constitutional authority.
What standing does the NY AG have in this matter. Is she going to suffer "irreparable harm"? Maybe! Let's hope so!
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
As you’ve probably figured, no. Unfortunately, one of the skillsets in the “practice of law” is forum shopping for just the right District Court judge.
However, upon reading this, I did wonder what the conservative reaction to some of this data mining would be had Biden done it.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Is there any data accumulated within the Executive Branch that is not accessible to the President?
How would the court order be enforced? @Hoyacon
CONTRIBUTOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It is supposed to be. Except in the fever dreams of Federal Circuit Court judges, I guess.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That’s one way to phrase it, and I do not know the answer but would say “no.”The other way to look at it would be to ask if there is any data that should not be be accessed by the President as a matter of principle. Tax returns?
You're seeing five of 216 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.