Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Here is an excerpt from an article in today’s Epoch Times.
A California district judge granted partial relief to some of the federal government’s recently terminated probationary employees who argued that their termination from various agencies was unlawfully ordered by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) under the false cause of performance. Senior District Judge William Alsup provided partial relief on Feb. 27 to the non-union organizational employees, ordering their immediate reinstatement to agencies including the National Parks Service, every agency within the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Small Business Bureau. He also ordered that OPM’s request be stopped and rescinded, because of the possibility of more federal employees being let go under the request.
This is, to me at least, a typical and all too frequent example of judges, high and low, taking on the role of shaping our laws to fit their own political leanings. It seems foolish and dangerous when a local judge can overrule executive and legislative decisions without regard to the Constitution. It all started with Roe v. Wade when the Supreme Court found that abortion was a constitutional right under a never-before-discovered, invisible clause. One of the Justices used the terms "penumbra" and "emanations" to describe how the right to privacy was derived from other rights in the Bill of Rights. Using that standard, there seems to be no limit to what the courts can order or deny.
Here’s the link to the Epoch Times article.
Are we becoming a nation ruled by unelected (for the most part) men in robes seated above the common citizens?
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (17)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
If Clarence Thomas was Chief Justice, this crap would not be happening.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
There has been no check on rogue judges. Overturning isn’t a punishment.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
These judges actually hate to be overturned, but hot heads will be hot heads. Congress could impeach them to a man, and should. They won't make the 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate, but an impeached judge has reduced prospects and reputation.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I bet there's ways to prosecute them for some kind of misconduct, if someone looks into it enough. That doesn't even require a House vote.
For example, that one judge whose wife is involved with some group that got a big chunk of money from USAID, I think it was.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think they are so self involved that they do not care about reputation. And they know they have peaked but are secure for life. Meanwhile they can do things.
You're seeing five of 17 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.