3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. It is beginning to appear that we no longer need the Executive and Legislative branches of government --
March 1, 2025 at 5:45 PM

It is beginning to appear that we no longer need the Executive and Legislative branches of government --

Jim McConnell
@JimMcConnell

CHARTER MEMBER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark19likesJoin to like17comments

Here is an excerpt from an article in today’s Epoch Times.

A California district judge granted partial relief to some of the federal government’s recently terminated probationary employees who argued that their termination from various agencies was unlawfully ordered by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) under the false cause of performance. Senior District Judge William Alsup provided partial relief on Feb. 27 to the non-union organizational employees, ordering their immediate reinstatement to agencies including the National Parks Service, every agency within the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Small Business Bureau. He also ordered that OPM’s request be stopped and rescinded, because of the possibility of more federal employees being let go under the request.

This is, to me at least, a typical and all too frequent example of judges, high and low, taking on the role of shaping our laws to fit their own political leanings. It seems foolish and dangerous when a local judge can overrule executive and legislative decisions without regard to the Constitution. It all started with Roe v. Wade when the Supreme Court found that abortion was a constitutional right under a never-before-discovered, invisible clause. One of the Justices used the terms "penumbra" and "emanations" to describe how the right to privacy was derived from other rights in the Bill of Rights. Using that standard, there seems to be no limit to what the courts can order or deny.

Here’s the link to the Epoch Times article.

Are we becoming a nation ruled by unelected (for the most part) men in robes seated above the common citizens?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (17)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (¡Afuera!)@DonG·1y

    If Clarence Thomas was Chief Justice, this crap would not be happening.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·1y

    There has been no check on rogue judges. Overturning isn’t a punishment.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sisyphus@Sisyphus·1y
    ReplyingtoRed Herring

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    There has been no check on rogue judges. Overturning isn’t a punishment.

    These judges actually hate to be overturned, but hot heads will be hot heads. Congress could impeach them to a man, and should. They won't make the 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate, but an impeached judge has reduced prospects and reputation.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y

    I bet there's ways to prosecute them for some kind of misconduct, if someone looks into it enough. That doesn't even require a House vote.

    For example, that one judge whose wife is involved with some group that got a big chunk of money from USAID, I think it was.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EODmom@EODmom·1y
    ReplyingtoSisyphus

    Red Herring (View Comment):

    There has been no check on rogue judges. Overturning isn’t a punishment.

    Sisyphus (View Comment):

    These judges actually hate to be overturned, but hot heads will be hot heads. Congress could impeach them to a man, and should. They won’t make the 2/3rds vote to convict in the Senate, but an impeached judge has reduced prospects and reputation.

    I think they are so self involved that they do not care about reputation. And they know they have peaked but are secure for life. Meanwhile they can do things.

Scroll for later comments
+12 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 17 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •