Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
A half-century ago, moviegoers flocked to see Inspector Harry Callahan (Dirty Harry) and Paul Kersey (Death Wish) fight wrongdoing in a world where sclerotic legal processes were worse than useless. The system had become unduly solicitous to the rights of villains who had nothing but contempt for the rights of others and for the system itself.
Like some smug, obviously guilty killer going free on some evidentiary or procedural issue in the first 30 minutes of a Death Wish or Dirty Harry movie, the current crop of plaintiffs defending waste, fraud, abuse, grift, gangsterism and/or terrorism supporters are strolling out of well-selected federal courthouses with an injunction or order in hand and a big smile on their faces.
The left has utter contempt for taxpayers and has lawlessly separated billions of dollars from both the will of Congress and the control of the president. But if accountability raises its ugly head suddenly, the Administrative Procedures Act or some lesser regulations supposedly trump both constitutional authority and public welfare.
The current immigration crisis was created as Biden and Secretary Mayorkis betrayed the law, backstabbed line officers, lied to Congress and knowingly admitted millions of illegals, including known criminals. However unlawful those actions, we are told by our betters that undoing that criminal handiwork is constrained by their newfound, entirely disingenuous love of regular order and due process.
Aside from the likelihood of appellate victories for Trump in most of these lawfare battles, there is a likely political benefit. Federal judges should meditate on the fact that there were seven sequels for Death Wish and four for Dirty Harry. People like seeing wrongs righted, especially when they feel our social order is threatened. It diminishes respect for the law when partisan judges actively inhibit just and necessary outcomes. A few, well-crafted executive Dirty Harry maneuvers in the face of establishment intransigence (like depositing undesirables in Salvadoran jails) will be rewarded at the ballot box, and maybe restore some balance and good order.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (5)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I like how it was put in this video: They'll learn the easy way, or the hard way.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Amen.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Indeed. While learning Criminal Procedure in law school it occurred to me Clint Eastwood owes his career to Justice Brennan.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
We elect someone to perform the executive function of the United States Constitution. We do not elect federal judges, but if they insist on behaving as a one man executive, maybe we should.
The President takes a lot of rhetorical abuse for some of their decisions. In Trump's case, all of them. Maybe it's time to change our relationship with the Federal judiciary. Instead of "your Honor" we'll go with "hey you in the robes."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I'm not convinced that states that have elected state judges, are doing better. People seem to pay about as much attention to the judges they vote for (or don't) as their Representatives and Senators.