Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
For years we’ve been hearing that our military is “top heavy,” but no one has been motivated to do something about it. Finally, President Trump and DOD Sec. Hegseth are taking action:
‘[W]e must cultivate exceptional senior leaders who drive innovation and operational excellence, unencumbered by unnecessary bureaucratic layers that hinder their growth and effectiveness,’ Hegseth wrote in a memo. ‘A critical step in this process is removing redundant force structure to optimize and streamline leadership by reducing excess general and flag officer positions.’
Protests have been lodged by the Democrats, of course:
Sen. Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, questioned Hegseth’s rationale for the cuts and warned dismissing top officers without ‘sound justification’ could ‘cripple’ the military. 'I have always advocated for efficiency at the Department of Defense, but tough personnel decisions should be based on facts and analysis, not arbitrary percentages. Eliminating the positions of many of our most skilled and experienced officers without sound justification would not create ‘efficiency’ in the military – it could cripple it,’ Reed said in a statement Monday.
His words are amusing, since it hasn’t occurred to him that Hegseth might have been justified in eliminating an even higher percentage than 20%; he hints at this point when he states that he plans to remove a minimum of 20%. Also, the secretary probably did a preliminary assessment to determine whether he was in a justifiable range for the number of removals. He addressed the questions about his strategy in this way, too:
‘When we were fighting across the globe during World War II, we had a force that was 12-million-strong. For that 12-million-man element, we had 17 four-and-five-star generals. Today, we have 2.1 million service members and 44 four-star and flag officers. So, it used to be a ratio of one general to 6,000 troops. Today, it's one general to 1,400.’ [snip] ‘This is not a slash-and-burn exercise meant to punish high-ranking officers. Nothing could be further from the truth. This has been a deliberative process working with the Joint Chiefs of Staff with one goal: maximizing strategic readiness and operational effectiveness.’ Hegseth said the plan will be carried out ‘carefully, but expeditiously’ in two phases. ‘Phase one is a minimum of 20% reduction of four-star and flag officers for active duty elements and a minimum of 20% reduction of general and flag officers in the National Guard Bureau,’ he said. ‘Phase two will produce a minimum of an additional 10% reduction of overall general and flag officers throughout the DOD.’
His straight talk criticizing the highest levels in the military speaks volumes about the state of affairs:
‘I would say over a third are actively complicit, and then you have a lot of grumblers who are sort of going along, trying to resist the nonsense as much as they can, but they’re not fundamentally changing it,’ he said. In a second podcast, Hegseth claimed that senior officers in the military are ‘playing by all the wrong rules’ to cater to ‘idealogues in Washington, DC.’ ‘And so they’ll do any social justice, gender, climate, extremism crap because it gets them checked to the next level,’ he said.
Hegseth has done his homework and is ready to shake things up.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (69)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I think there should be a competition to see who stays--part physical and mostly mental. Lock them in a room and see who can convince the most peers to follow them, sort of a mix of Jeopardy and Survivor.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I was hoping for gladiatorial combat, but I'm easy.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Wandering through the Pentagon one day I happened upon a luncheon event attended by thousands of three and four stars, mostly American. It was an impressive experience. Didn't look into it any further, I had other duties to attend to.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Thousands? How many three-stars are there?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
And, of course, the nattering about percentages as a bad basis for executive decisions is an interesting point coming from the Quotacrats. He might need to go to 80% if the point is purging DEI hires.
You're seeing five of 69 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.