3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. I Was (Briefly) Suspended on X.com
September 17, 2024 at 10:32 AM

I Was (Briefly) Suspended on X.com

Rodin
@Rodin

MODERATOR

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark19likesJoin to like11comments

I have been recently active on X.com. It is my personal attempt to support and contribute to Elon Musk's venture. (I admire Musk's attempts to maintain one of the few free speech platforms in the world.)

So it came as a surprise to have my account suspended:

"Violent speech"? As you can imagine, I was flummoxed by the notice. I searched the comment to figure out what I had done to violate the rules. It turns out it was an exchange involving a woman who minimized (doubted?) that President Trump had been shot in the ear at the Butler rally, and who really wished Trump were dead because of what she imagined his abortion policy to be. I snarkily responded that that Trump was very nearly killed with a bullet to the brain, but that her brain was elsewhere in her anatomy so that "were she to be" shot in the head it would not be fatal. In my mind, I was describing a cartoon event and not advocating that she or anyone else should be shot. But the algorithm thought otherwise.

I contemplated having a human review my post and exonerate me. But, I thought, that might take a while. So I just deleted my post. Within a few hours, I was restored to full functionality. Did I make the right decision?

I realized that what had started as thoughtful posting on X had devolved to reactive snark. It wasn't a good look.

One should always observe the Golden Rule without regard to whether that person merits it. Trust me, you'll feel better about yourself.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (11)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·2y

    I would have contested it. I have won doing that when a human overrides the AI interpretation.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam)@DonG·2y
    Rodin (View Post):
    One should always observe the Golden Rule

    The one with gold writes the rules??

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Rodin@Rodin·2y
    ReplyingtoDonG (CAGW is a Scam)

    DonG (CAGW is a Scam) (View Comment):

    Rodin (View Post):

    Rodin (View Post):
    One should always observe the Golden Rule

    The one with gold writes the rules??

    I knew there would be reason to include a link. 😄

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·2y

    The left and their bots repeatedly flag comments they don't like and their software reacts. AI has its limitations. When I question it, a human gets involved and I usually win. AI is weak on nuance. Sometimes it is easier to just delete the comment.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    cdor@cdor·2y
    I bet you could have rewritten the comment so that your point would be made and the comment would stay. Although, I personally love the original.
Scroll for later comments
+6 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of eleven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •