Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
I have been recently active on X.com. It is my personal attempt to support and contribute to Elon Musk's venture. (I admire Musk's attempts to maintain one of the few free speech platforms in the world.)
So it came as a surprise to have my account suspended:
"Violent speech"? As you can imagine, I was flummoxed by the notice. I searched the comment to figure out what I had done to violate the rules. It turns out it was an exchange involving a woman who minimized (doubted?) that President Trump had been shot in the ear at the Butler rally, and who really wished Trump were dead because of what she imagined his abortion policy to be. I snarkily responded that that Trump was very nearly killed with a bullet to the brain, but that her brain was elsewhere in her anatomy so that "were she to be" shot in the head it would not be fatal. In my mind, I was describing a cartoon event and not advocating that she or anyone else should be shot. But the algorithm thought otherwise.
I contemplated having a human review my post and exonerate me. But, I thought, that might take a while. So I just deleted my post. Within a few hours, I was restored to full functionality. Did I make the right decision?
I realized that what had started as thoughtful posting on X had devolved to reactive snark. It wasn't a good look.
One should always observe the Golden Rule without regard to whether that person merits it. Trust me, you'll feel better about yourself.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (11)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I would have contested it. I have won doing that when a human overrides the AI interpretation.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The one with gold writes the rules??
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I knew there would be reason to include a link. 😄
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The left and their bots repeatedly flag comments they don't like and their software reacts. AI has its limitations. When I question it, a human gets involved and I usually win. AI is weak on nuance. Sometimes it is easier to just delete the comment.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You're seeing five of eleven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.