Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I have been recently active on X.com. It is my personal attempt to support and contribute to Elon Musk's venture. (I admire Musk's attempts to maintain one of the few free speech platforms in the world.)
So it came as a surprise to have my account suspended:
"Violent speech"? As you can imagine, I was flummoxed by the notice. I searched the comment to figure out what I had done to violate the rules. It turns out it was an exchange involving a woman who minimized (doubted?) that President Trump had been shot in the ear at the Butler rally, and who really wished Trump were dead because of what she imagined his abortion policy to be. I snarkily responded that that Trump was very nearly killed with a bullet to the brain, but that her brain was elsewhere in her anatomy so that "were she to be" shot in the head it would not be fatal. In my mind, I was describing a cartoon event and not advocating that she or anyone else should be shot. But the algorithm thought otherwise.
I contemplated having a human review my post and exonerate me. But, I thought, that might take a while. So I just deleted my post. Within a few hours, I was restored to full functionality. Did I make the right decision?
I realized that what had started as thoughtful posting on X had devolved to reactive snark. It wasn't a good look.
One should always observe the Golden Rule without regard to whether that person merits it. Trust me, you'll feel better about yourself.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (11)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I would have contested it. I have won doing that when a human overrides the AI interpretation.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The one with gold writes the rules??
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I knew there would be reason to include a link. 😄
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The left and their bots repeatedly flag comments they don't like and their software reacts. AI has its limitations. When I question it, a human gets involved and I usually win. AI is weak on nuance. Sometimes it is easier to just delete the comment.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You're seeing five of eleven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.