Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Last week, Jon Stewart had a dumb take that was not even intellectually coherent. Very shocking, I know. (<Link here, NSFW> I recommend skipping the video and reading my summary, but you can do as you like.)
Basically, it’s terrible to judge Somali-Americans as a group because of the actions of a few bad Somali-American leaders. However, judging white South Africans by the actions of their ancestors is legitimate. Also, judging anyone who voted for Trump as being an evil white racist or a fool is totally fine. This, according to Jon Stewart, anyway.
It is a common tactic deployed by Muslims and leftists about the problems of Muslim immigrant groups. “Most of them are decent and hard working, and you shouldn’t judge all Muslims by bad examples.” Without any exceptions that I am aware of, these same people judge whites and Israelis as a group.
For example, the woke left used the specific instance of George Floyd’s death as being representative of the attitudes of all whites and white society in general. That individual occurrence in Minneapolis wasn't just one cop behaving badly. It is an emblematic example of racial oppression everywhere. Strangely, this applied even in Britain. Historically. Britain didn’t have chattel slavery or Jim Crow. But they still had BLM riots. Such was the power of George Floyd.
The other most common example by Muslims was found in their response to the October 7th attacks (which was not unlike the reaction to any terrorist attack in general). Islamic apologists say that Israel’s response against Palestine over the October 7th attacks was deeply unfair because it punished all Palestinians for the actions of a radical few. They then want to boycott all of Israel for war crimes.
The left and Muslims don’t actually believe in not judging groups. It’s just that when a group they are advocating for does something bad, they begin to say, “Not all x does y.” While that is technically true, it is used to obfuscate the obvious reality that some groups have strikingly different rates of particular behaviors. Somalis have much higher rates of government fraud, and Pakistani Muslims have much higher rates of rape. Both groups have very high rates of cousin marriage. Importing those groups in masse would simply cause more problems than importing other groups.
Jon Stewart likely knows that importing Somalis has more downsides than importing middle-class Swedes. If he doesn’t, his research team knows it. But the Somali’s are part of his coalition of the oppressed in the leftist imagination, therefore they can’t be judged by the regular moral standards that ‘regular’ groups of people can be judged by.
When Leftists say that you should’t judge groups, ask them if they judge Israelis, Afrikaners, or white Christians in the American South. If that doesn’t work, ask them if they judge Republicans. If they say that being a Republican is being part of an ideology and not an ethnic group, and that Republicans can be held accountable according to the results of that ideology, then ask if Islam should be judged by similar standards.
Likely, it will result in an ad hominem or communist gobbledygook, but it will be a lively conversation.
I find it all quite annoying. These rhetorical flourishes are used to avoid blatant statistical realities that everyone understands. Obviously, people notice that different groups behave differently.
Just a few days ago, as I was completing this essay, Piers Morgan interviewed Nick Fuentes and pretended that he was dumb enough to ignore the entire idea of per capita rates. I’m no Fuentes fan, but Piers Morgan's obstinate refusal to admit transparent realities made Fuentes look sensible.
As Thomas Sowell has noted, one of the most consistent patterns throughout human civilization is that different groups have markedly different patterns of behavior. Pretending that every demographic is the same can work for a while when you live in a neighborhood of upper-middle-class white people with private security, as Piers Morgan does. But in almost every other circumstance, from immigration policy to deciding where to visit in Chicago, pretending that every demographic is the same is the height of foolishness.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (30)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Excellent post, Henry. And that is precisely what the Left does: they criticize groups they hate and embrace groups they love. The sad part is that I don't know if they even realize what they are doing. They just see these conclusions as "facts."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
"If all cultures are equal, then cannibalism is just a matter of culinary taste."
Léo Strauss
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Disagree on purely semantic grounds.
To judge is to assign blame and to dole out punishment. It's why we in the West limit the power of judgement to official representatives of the state. When Jesus talked about putting limits on judgement it was almost always in reference to an incident where the subject being judged was in imminent danger of execution by a mob.
Yes, as individuals we should criticize, abhor, boycott, avoid, attempt to educate/deprogram, etc. certain groups, but to "judge" means taking it up a notch, beyond our authority as individuals unless we are willing to accept equivalent judgement in return.
IMHO
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I hereby judge MAGA on the basis of the bad behavior of some of its adherents.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Chris Rock had a bit about, when driving through an unfamiliar city on the freeway, you should never take the exit at Martin Luther King Jr Street/Avenue/Blvd.
You're seeing five of 30 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.