The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowFederalist Radio HourNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMadison’s NotesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. Biden Replacement and the Kamala Problem
June 28, 2024 at 11:00 AM

Biden Replacement and the Kamala Problem

BastiatJunior
@BastiatJunior

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark23likesJoin to like36comments

After the debate, Brit Hume made the point that there are two ways to replace Biden at the top of the Democratic ticket. Both ways would require Biden's cooperation, which might not be as far-fetched as many think.

One way would be for Biden to step down right away, making Kamala Harris President. The other way would be to replace him at the convention, by nominating someone else who would be free to choose a running mate. Biden would stay President until January 20th.

The Democrats could consider both ways as a third option. Biden would agree not to be the nominee. The Democrats would nominate someone else. After the convention is over, Biden would resign, and we'd get President Harris. Now Kamala would be President for only five months.

Regardless of what they do, January 20th is a long way off.

Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (36)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • D

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Django@Django·2y
    There is a fourth: 25th. Kamala becomes President. Demo-rats search for the up-side.
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    BastiatJunior@BastiatJunior·2y
    ReplyingtoDjango

    Django (View Comment):

    There is a fourth: 25th. Kamala becomes President. Demo-rats search for the up-side.

    Good point. Also has the advantage of not requiring Biden's consent.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·2y
    ReplyingtoBastiatJunior

    Django (View Comment):

    There is a fourth: 25th. Kamala becomes President. Demo-rats search for the up-side.

    BastiatJunior (View Comment):

    Good point. Also has the advantage of not requiring Biden’s consent.

    On the other hand, they could always just tell Joe that he DID consent. Maybe after he signs the document, and has some ice cream.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·2y

    Not that Democrats care about such things, but aren't most delegates legally obligated to vote for the candidate picked in a primary or state convention ? That means that Biden's consent is likely required.

    The harder part is gracefully pushing the idiot Veep aside.

    My fear is that they would be smart enough to push out Biden and tap a southern or midwestern low visibility candidate as the non-Trump average person who can be packaged and sold as centrist while the party moves even deeper under full control of wealthy perverts and extremists.

  • E

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EODmom@EODmom·2y
    ReplyingtoOld Bathos

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Not that Democrats care about such things, but aren’t most delegates legally obligated to vote for the candidate picked in a primary or state convention ? That means that Biden’s consent is likely required.

    The harder part is gracefully pushing the idiot Veep aside.

    My fear is that they would be smart enough to push out Biden and tap a southern or midwestern low visibility candidate as the non-Trump average person who can be packaged and sold as centrist while the party moves even deeper under full control of wealthy perverts and extremists.

    I still contend an announcement will be made on his behalf. Everything else is being done on his behalf - so this too. Keeping Jill out of the public face will be a problem but all they have to do with him is not dress him for the morning.

+31 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 36 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •