Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
For years, the United Kingdom attracted the world's wealthiest people. The system was brilliant in its simplicity: for a low negotiated cost, the individual and their family could live tax-free in the UK. The former owner of Harrods, Al-Fayed, reportedly paid 100k GBP yearly, regardless of income. Remember that he was an Egyptian and could have chosen to live anywhere. But thanks to this offer, he moved to the UK - and enriched the country as a result.
There were variations on this theme, but the underlying appeal was huge: move to the UK as a Non-Dom (Non-Domiciled for tax purposes), and pay no taxes (at least on non-UK income). The end result was decades of economic growth, an absolutely bonkers housing market, and ongoing foreign investment into houses, cars, sports teams, and luxury goods of all kinds. Not to mention investment in businesses (like Harrods). Everyone could be a winner - except the countries the rich were fleeing. (The UK has now abolished this system.)
The Gold Card idea is an improvement on the Non-Dom status, because the Gold Card is not about gaining citizenship, not at all! Instead, the Gold Card gives the payer of $5 million (there are perhaps 3-5 million people in the world who could afford it) the right to live in the United States tax-free. They do not choose citizenship, because they have all the benefits without being subject to US taxes! (US citizens pay tax on global income, but Gold Card holders would owe no US taxes on personal income.)
And, of course, when Gold Card holders buy houses and cars and luxury goods, the US benefits. And when they start businesses here and employ people (as rich people naturally do), the benefits accrue to all of America, including business taxes and income from the companies - in addition to the valuable goods and services that business provides.
I love it. America will benefit enormously. So will the Gold Card holders. If 1 million people convert, that is $5 trillion into the treasury - plus all the follow-on benefits from having the very best kind of immigrants: hard-working, long-term planning, wealthy and inclined to investment.
Where it gets even more interesting is if America's wealthy start agitating for a similar option for American Citizens. As has already been seen, other countries are more than happy to sell citizenship (and no taxation) to wealthy Americans. The net result is a competitive environment to attract and keep wealthy people. The more competition there is, the better!
But the underlying Gold Card idea is brilliant and can help usher in a new Golden Age for America's economy and society.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (7)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Seems to me terrorist groups or hostile nations could scrape up enough money to buy a legal, permanent foothold in this country. I assume there would be strict requirements for buying such a card . . .
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Remember that bit about bonkers real estate markets?
Have you ever read articles about how rich
Chinesehonourable foreign guests in Canuckistan have driven real estate prices out of the reach of native-born Canuckistanis?I'm just saying...
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Buyers must pass background checks and be vetted. Apparently over 1,000 have already been sold.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
We have to have less regulation on housing anyway. Housing should not be expensive for regulatory reasons (though it is).
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
A further explanation of the Canuckistani case: It's illegal for Chinese citizens to move their liquid assets out of China, but it's not illegal for them to buy investments in other countries.
So, those that want to protect their wealth from confiscation by Beijing started buying up real estate in Vancouver and Toronto and then never living there. So, real estate prices skyrocketed and there have been stories multi-million dollar condos sitting empty in the middle of a housing crisis (although many of 'em do rent the properties out, thereby earning Western currency that Beijing can't confiscate).
I used to be pretty sympathetic with such folk. After all, I fully support Chinese citizens finding a way to stick it to the kleptocrats in Beijing.
However, now that it has come out just how many of these folk are fully loyal to Beijing and use their Canuckistani real estate income to donate to Beijing-friendly Trudeaupian politicians, my sympathy has been greatly strained.
Lesson: Opening up your real estate market to wealthy folk from countries whose loyalty to the USA is "questionable" might not be a brilliant move. Rich folk from despotic countries tend to be rich because they're friends with the despots.
ON THE OTHER HAND
They'll probably mostly buy real estate on the west coast, and who cares what happens to those states?
;-)
You're seeing five of seven comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.