3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Is It Harder to Kill People You Know?
September 25, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Is It Harder to Kill People You Know?

Eustace C. Scrubb
@EustaceCScrubb

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark19likesJoin to like15comments

I don't recall if anyone on Ricochet wrote a review of Salena Zito's book, Butler: The Untold Story of the Near Assassination of Donald Trump and the Fight for America's Heartland (Center Street, 2025). If someone did (I'm too lazy to research), I hope they agreed with me that it's a fine book, one worth reading. I hope that the review dug into the very interesting details the book examined about the 2024 election, the importance of the demographic shifts in rural America, and the failure of the current media to understand their fellow Americans.

But I want to focus on something else: Zito's ability to humanize many of the players in her book, particularly Donald Trump.

Particularly touching is the moment when Trump, the candidate, the day after he received a gunshot wound on that fateful day in Butler, Pennsylvania, telephoned Zito to apologize for missing the scheduled interview after the campaign event. Originally, Zito was supposed to interview Trump before the event, but Trump's campaign staff had to make a rearrangement.

Zito, her daughter, and her son-in-law were all seated close to the stage and witnessed the shooting, which took place as Trump began his speech. After the shooting (and the murder of firefighter Corey Comperatore), Trump was quickly rushed to a hospital. Zito reported on the event and eventually was able to return home.

And at her home, she was very surprised by a phone call from the former and soon again president apologizing, then asking about her welfare and the welfare of her daughter and son-in-law. She was so surprised that she found herself swearing at the candidate, "What the [bleep] are you doing calling me?" She apologized for her language, to Trump's amusement.

The Trump presented to us by the majority of media accounts is a narcissist, a self-centered monster who cares only about his image, power, and comfort. Zito presents a very different person in her book. She tells of a man who loves his grandchildren and inquires about Zito's grandchildren. A man at campaign events who greets his supporters with affection and kindness. A man who genuinely cares about his country and its citizens.

Zito also presents negative qualities in Trump. After Zito did an interview with Trump's rival in the primary, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, Trump lashed out at her on social media as a horrible reporter. But that flash of temper didn't last long.

When one looks at the hate and vitriol spewed at Trump in the media (mainstream and social), one can't help but wonder if that would change if people saw this other side of the man. Might they say, "I don't agree with the man's policies, but I would hate to see him come to any harm."? I know, it's hard to imagine.

Zito also presents a more kindly image of Vice President J. D. Vance than one usually gets in the media. At a visit to a medical training class, Vance observed students learning to take blood by practicing on each other. One student was very wary of letting another student draw her blood, so Vance stepped in and offered to take the student's place. The teacher allowed it, and the student who drew blood was successful on the first try.

Republicans aren't the only ones who come off well in the book. Zito writes quite kindly of Democrat Governor Josh Shapiro, portraying him as a leader with genuine concern for the good of his constituents, a man who, according to Zito (again using language of the blue variety), "he gets poop done."

How much of our culture would be healed if we didn't assume the worst about those with differing politics? If we really saw our opponents as people?

Even excerpts of Kamala Harris' new memoir make me see the former vice president in a more humane light. She was reprimanding staff for not properly preparing her for an interview, saying, "What the [redacted] was that?" When someone tried to respond, she said, "That was a rhetorical question!" It became a running gag with her staff to say, "That was a rhetorical question."

Now, Harris might not come across as particularly sympathetic in that story, but she does come across as human (I'm not the first to make the comparison to Selina Meyer in the HBO sitcom Veep). When I hear a story like this, I'm glad she's not our president, but I also see her as a real person. And I wish no harm to come to her.

So am I a fool to think that political violence would decrease if more people saw the people on the other side as people? People not bent on evil, but just trying to do what is right in their own eyes?

Maybe it would deter a sniper or two if they looked at things in such a way.

On the other hand, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in a 2023 study, said that 36% of women murdered were killed by an "intimate partner." So, while I think it might help if we knew each other better, there's no guarantee.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (15)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Post):

    So, while I think it might help if we knew each other better, there’s no guarantee.

    Very true.

  • STAFF • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EJHill@EJHill·1y
    Eustace C. Scrubb: So am I a fool to think that political violence would decrease if more people saw the people on the other side as people? People not bent on evil, but just trying to do what is right in their own eyes?

    I don't think you're a fool. But the people busy calling the other side "demonic" and "evil' might disagree.

    And for the record, @She wrote a very good review of the book. And we know for a fact that Salena Zito read it.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    ReplyingtoEJHill

    EJHill (View Comment):

    I don’t think you’re not a fool.

    Might count the negatives in that.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Fritz@Fritz·1y

    We humans seem to teeter-totter between two counterbalancing aphorisms:

    "Don't judge a man until you've walked a mile in his shoes."

    AND

    "Familiarity breeds contempt."

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Bob Thompson@BobThompson·1y
    Eustace C. Scrubb (View Post):

    How much of our culture would be healed if we didn’t assume the worst about those with differing politics? If we really saw our opponents as people?

    Here's how I see the problem. Both parties have fringe elements that are totally unacceptable. I think the Democrat fringe, think extreme, is somewhat larger than the Republican fringe. But the real problem is where the party leadership is. The Democrat leadership is in the fringe and the Republican fringe has no leadership position.

Scroll for later comments
+10 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 15 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •