Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Donald Trump’s First Term Apparently Doesn’t Count

Susan Quinn
@SusanQuinn
Join to bookmark26likesJoin to like65comments

Don’t you find it interesting that Trump is being accused of wanting to commit all kinds of abhorrent actions and behaviors that he has never demonstrated? That if you look at his first term, his policies were quite good? That he didn’t abuse his power or meddle with the powers of others?

I continue to marvel at the number of people who are crying out about his “fascist” or “autocratic” nature. When did he act that way? He never misused the military; when he recommended to Nancy Pelosi that the National Guard be called up prior to January 6, he was ignored. When he suggested that state governors use the National Guard in June 2020, men like Tim Walz ignored him. And he didn't interfere with their decisions.

He does sometimes talk hyperbolically. Well, he does it a lot, and that’s Donald Trump. He’s never abused the Constitution. He has always (in spite of the rumors) shown respect for the military, especially our men and women on the ground. Some people will say that now that he knows how the Executive Branch works, he will become more aggressive. I suspect instead that he's less likely to make mistakes and will pick more qualified and supportive people.

And yet people, from Congress, the military and even his cabinet repeatedly attacked him. They have apparently assumed that their cause is so great that they can lie about just about anything.

If people would only look at his first term and judge him on what he accomplished, they wouldn’t be wringing their hands over actions he would never take.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (65)

  • MWD B612 "Dawg"@danok1
    Susan Quinn (View Post):

    Don’t you find it interesting that Trump is being accused of wanting to commit all kinds of abhorrent actions and behaviors that he has never demonstrated? That if you look at his first term, his policies were quite good? That he didn’t abuse his power or meddle with the powers of others?

    I continue to marvel at the number of people who are crying out about his “fascist” or “autocratic” nature. When did he act that way? He never misused the military; when he recommended to Nancy Pelosi that the National Guard be called up prior to January 6, he was ignored. When he suggested that state governors use the National Guard in June 2020, men like Tim Walz ignored him. And he didn’t interfere with their decisions.

    He does sometimes talk hyperbolically. Well, he does it a lot, and that’s Donald Trump. He’s never abused the Constitution. He has always (in spite of the rumors) shown respect for the military, especially our men and women on the ground. Some people will say that now that he knows how the Executive Branch works, he will become more aggressive. I suspect instead that he’s less likely to make mistakes and will pick more qualified and supportive people.

    And yet people, from Congress, the military and even his Cabinet repeatedly attacked him. They have apparently assumed that their cause is so great that they can lie about just about anything.

    If people would only look at his first term and judge him on what he accomplished, they wouldn’t be wringing their hands over actions he will never take.

    The argument seems to be this: Well, he was constrained in his first term because he wanted to be re-elected, But this time, when he can't run again, he'll unleash his inner-Hitler.

    Counterargument: If he unleashed his "inner-Hitler" in the first term, he wouldn't have had to run for re-election.

Scroll for later comments
+60 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 65 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.