3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Willful Blindness to Wuhan Coronavirus
December 31, 2024 at 1:02 PM

Willful Blindness to Wuhan Coronavirus

OmegaPaladin
@OmegaPaladin

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark31likesJoin to like93comments

When I first heard about the coronavirus outbreak, the fact that it emerged in a city with a controversial virology institute was beyond suspicious. My initial mental model for the incident was Chernobyl — a catastrophe caused by brutal totalitarian rule. Yet there was a massive crackdown on any mention of a laboratory incident. Seeing that Fauci was directly linked to the crackdown, while also having pushed forward gain-of-function research via EcoHealth Alliance in an end run around the carefully written regulations and review process, disgusted me.

As if this were not bad enough, it turns out the intelligence agencies were directly involved in this cover-up/disinformation operation (hat tip to Ed Morrissey at HotAir). The intelligence community ignored their own experts in the National Center for Medical Intelligence, who concluded it was man-made and pushed aside the FBI for coming to a similar conclusion.

The real question to ask here is why. Why was it so crucial to view the Wuhan Coronavirus as having a natural origin? Were our bureaucrats so devoted/bought & paid for by the PRC? Was it a massive status quo bias refusing to rock the diplomatic boat? I understand why people are seeing a grand conspiracy here, even if I'm not ready to take that particular leap.

What do you think?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (93)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    namlliT noD@DonTillman·1y
    OmegaPaladin (View Post):
    The real question to ask here is why. Why was it so crucial to view the Wuhan Coronavirus as having a natural origin?

    Avoiding blame, of course.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    The Reticulator@TheReticulator·1y
    OmegaPaladin (View Post):
    As if this were not bad enough, it turns out the intelligence agencies were directly involved in this cover-up / disinformation operation (hat tip to Ed Morrissey at HotAir) The intelligence community ignored their own experts in the National Center for Medical Intelligence, who concluded it was man-made, and pushed aside the FBI for coming to a similar conclusion.

    I had read about the FBI being pushed aside, but I thought their opinion was that it was a lab leak, not necessarily that it was man-made. I realize there can be a grey area between the two. I had better start reading more carefully.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    OmegaPaladin (View Post):
    What do you think?

    Whatever we think, it is worse.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Tex929rr@Tex929rr·1y

    I said in another conversation some months ago that it’s like a Tom Clancy book plot. The highest paid, longest tenured government employee arranges for dangerous viral research outside the US, in direct violation of strictly established protocols. The virus breaks out and kills millions. A cover up that aids the communist Chinese government is aided and abetted by federal employees from multiple agencies for years, and no one is held to account.

    We lived though it and it’s still hard to believe that no one but the innocent have paid a price.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·1y

    If you on going full Clancy, add in a vaccination later discovered to cause genetic mutations and the offing of the offspring of the vaccinated. With that, you could go full evil circle.

Scroll for later comments
+88 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 93 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •