3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Your Choice in November
June 28, 2024 at 4:52 PM

Your Choice in November

Red Herring
@EHerring

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark36likesJoin to like52comments

Ricochet members frequently have spirited debates over how and why to vote, or not, in November. These debates never solve anything and rarely address the real issue. Too often they concentrate on the candidate and not the party that will be in power setting the agenda.

Our country has been slouching towards totalitarianism in some form ever since the “Progressives” emerged in 1898. It didn’t matter which party won. Names we were taught to revere in history class share in the blame: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Wilson, Dewey, etc. Under the guise of a special love for humanity, constitutional amendments and social programs were passed that are now bankrupting us. The same humanity excuse is being used to rip apart our borders, our identity as a country, and even our moral values. For some unfathomable reason, too many think age and personality should guide their choice.

The #1 priority that should guide your choice is the understanding that you are picking the party and ideology that will govern and will therefore determine the direction the country will take. Deferring this choice until 4 years later could be fatal for the country. We are in the end stages of the Marxist cultural revolution, launched by the adherents of the “Frankfurt School,” the cultural Marxists welcomed into our Ivies after WWII. Their critical theory ideas have been wholly accepted and spread by the left, affecting and weakening every institution. It might even be too late already. Waiting one or two elections for your perfect candidate to emerge before you can start the correction is not wise.

The US isn’t alone. The entire Western world is under assault, often succumbing to it. The World Economic Forum is a major driver. If you look at Biden’s executive orders, they often are in lockstep with WEF goals, which do not coincidentally bear a close resemblance to critical theory goals. The party you put in the White House will continue to push its own ideology. When Trump was in the White House, he pushed ours, whether or not it passed your purity test. Despite the arrogant backstabbers in his administration, his economic team was excellent and several think tanks had their say. The Biden Administration implements the lefty agenda from its power brokers and think tanks. Pick the ideology you want to set the direction of the country.

The next consideration should be based on how things were in the candidates’ first four years in office. Why is this my #2? Because many of Trump’s successes were not acknowledged by even by our own side. This includes the Trump haters who begrudged him every little success. As a result, much of the electorate isn't aware of them.

Now for the reasons you should set aside, or in some cases, excuses you shouldn’t use:

#1. You are in a blue state so your vote doesn’t matter. The Democrats have been pushing gimmicks and spin to replace the Electoral College with a national popular vote. This gets purchase for two reasons: they often win the popular vote (unless you subtract California votes) and civic ignorance. We need every popular vote— in both blue states and red states— to convince them they aren’t the majority.

#2. Abortion. We got a bad court ruling overturned. Accept the victory and fight it out in each state. Some foolishly say Trump isn’t as pro-life as they would like. So what? He delivered. It is a state issue now, unless the Democrats win the White House.

#3. Age. So what? Our Constitution ensures a continuation of governance should the president falter. We aren’t as likely to prop up a semi-corpse figurehead as the Democrats have done. The VP choice is critical. We only need two years of Trump's fighting spirit to put things in motion; three would be a bonus. We would get four years, even if his VP must replace him. He needs a strong staff, and by all indications, he is putting together a loyal band ahead of time. Think tanks are drafting something resembling Newt’s “Contract With America.” Have you noticed how effective his campaign ads are?

#4. Personality. If this is what drives you, even above the future of the country, then you deserve what the Democrats will continue to do to this country. Freedom isn’t free. It must be fought for. If this is all it takes for you to roll over on the country, then I am done. I won’t save you.

#5. Morality. If you feel the need to engage in moral preening, do it elsewhere—not in the voting booth. None of the moral preeners have lived a more prudish lifestyle than I have. I can separate a person’s youthful indiscretions from his later years. I grew up in the 60s. I know how most in my generation behaved. Divorced? So what? Trump has finally found what works for him. All the accusations that have surfaced? Oh, please! Democrats have been dragging such people and accusations out for years to damage our choices. Why do they do that? To use our values against us (Alinsky rule) because enough people fall for it every time. Note that these aren’t their values. They hated every moral candidate we had in the past. It is a tactic, that is all. At this point I ignore the accusation and just consider each one another fabrication.

So now you have my rationale. Do with it what you will. Some will not change. Adding ten pages of repetitive debate in the comment sections won’t change a mind solidly made up.

Each must make a choice. I just think you should consider whether the decision you make will be about you or your country.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (52)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • Banned Member@BryanGStephens·2y

    Well said, Red.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    David Foster@DavidFoster·2y

    "Too often they concentrate on the candidate and not the party that will be in power setting the agenda"

    Especially now, the party matters. If Biden s replaced on the ticket, the new candidate will still be the vehicle of Dem-party objectives. I discussed the nature of those objectives in my post Are You a Target?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Tex929rr@Tex929rr·2y

    Well said. Any ostensible conservative not voting for Trump is foolish.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·2y

    Yes, “foolish” might apply , and even “naive.” The problem with this debate on ricochet is the debate ends up with repetitive pages of comments and even insults. We need to remember that many people we disagree with are expressing values we hold in common under other circumstance. It is their rigid application here that puts the country at risk. The Bible would be a much smaller book if God had only chosen perfect people to do His will. He chose people as imperfect as those they must lead.

  • STAFF • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    EJHill@EJHill·2y
    Red Herring (View Post):
    The next consideration is how were things in the candidates’ first four years in office? Why is this my #2? Because many of Trump’s successes were not acknowledged by even our own side, the Trump haters who begrudged him every little success, so many aren’t aware.

    Except those successes are a direct result of the "arrogant backstabbers" you hate. Paul Ryan and Kevin Brady ushered in the tax cuts. Mitch McConnell was more responsible for the Supreme Court than anybody.

    Red Herring (View Post):
    I can separate a person’s youthful indiscretions from his later years.

    Donald Trump was freaking 60 years old when he cheated on wife #3. He was 53 when he cheated on wife #2. He was 44 when he cheated on wife #1. At exactly what point does "youthful indiscretion" stop and being a disloyal, rotten human being begin? You have accepted Clintonian morality in its fullest form.

    Red Herring (View Post):
    He needs a strong staff, and by all indications, he is putting together a loyal band ahead of time.

    Loyalty to the man and not the Constitution or the law. Down this path lie dragons.

Scroll for later comments
+47 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 52 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •