Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Are the actions against the regimes in Venezuela and Iran merely instances of presidential vanity? The fact that Donald Trump does not make any attempt to conceal but instead celebrates his self-regard causes some to assert that all US policy is now done merely in service to presidential vanity.
Trump's actions in these areas (including the ongoing strangulation of the Cuban dictatorship) may or may not involve some narrower egoistic motivations, but each of these sets of actions is consonant with American interests in large measure because these regimes make no secret of their enmity to the USA and the willingness to ally with other overt enemies to do injury to America's vital interests and its people.
Those two features are in stark contrast to the results of policies executed by a former president whose self-regard clearly rivals and may even exceed that of Donald Trump.
Recall the famous "apology tour" of Barack Obama in which he tried to convince the world's bad actors that because Americans had elected a truly transcendent figure, not bound by tacky allegiance to petty notions like American exceptionalism or the moral and practical superiority of democracy, that it would be OK to cease their heretofore entirely justified dislike of the USA.
We were thus prepared for the wondrous sophistication of Obama's approach to Iran's nuclear weapons program--affirm Iran's grievances and ambitions, make a continuous stream of concessions, rule out retaliation for breaches of agreements or for acts of terrorism, and ignore all hostile acts or rhetoric. By signaling our refusal to counter or seriously threaten Iran's overtly anti-American goals and actions, this would somehow establish lasting peace founded on the personal wonderfulness of Barack Obama—an approach that was delusional, contrary to short and long-term US interests and unambiguously linked to the self-image of the Light Bringer.
Big egos in leaders are to be expected. It becomes a problem when that ego sets an agenda contrary to national interest or effective governance. Donald Trump is often maddeningly petty and rude, given to impromptu actions, bad at listening to critical advice and fond of bombast. But unlike the entire leadership of the opposition party, he does not hate American interests, despise American culture nor disparage the American people as deplorables, racists or persons too stupid to obtain ID and run their own lives. So there is that—and it matters.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (55)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I’ll take bombastic success over prideful ineffectiveness any day.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
And whose military actions wouldn't involve silly things like "America winning." Or as then-Secretary of State John Kerry put it: Military strikes would be "just muscular enough not to get mocked."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Look how effective government agencies suddenly became under his leadership.
His actions make more sense when looked at as part of his grand national strategy. Every one of them helps the US and serves to weaken China's influence. Sure, it looks like he isn't as serious about the Russia threat but weakening China weakens Russia, too. They had an alliance against us. Destroying Iran, Russia’s proxy weakens Russia, too. Showing Chinese and Russian technology to be cheap crap weakens them. The US re-achieves global dominance without going to war with the two remaining “superpowers.” We don’t need to fear them. We need to fear the Democrats and RINOs will stop him and ADD voters will turn on him before he is done.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To be governed by arrogance is a travesty, and Obama had plenty to spare. At least Trump's arrogance praises our country and our worth; Obama only denigrated us.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
On every day that ends in "y", ...
Benevolent "peacock" > Malevolent "peacock".
You're seeing five of 55 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.