Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Suppose you were an evil genius who decided to create a permanent underclass out of a particular race. What provisions would you make to ensure that they remained permanently poor and outcast?
Here are some ideas. First, physically separate them from the rest of the population. Give them room to live, but make sure the land is not owned by individuals who could grow their net worth but by the collective, each tribe with its own sovereign government within the national government.
Encourage economic dependency by supplying them with lots of free stuff, some available only to them. Create a bureaucracy to manage the financial affairs of only this particular race. Grant them special privileges exclusive to their race, such as the right to operate certain businesses, but again on the condition that the ownership is by the collective.
Finally, emphasize the history of oppression this selected race has experienced and how the guilty oppressors owe them these “favors” in perpetuity.
If you’ve deduced that this roughly describes the treatment whites accorded to American Indians, that’s because it does. We all know the story of how this came about. When Europeans settled the New World, the clash of civilizations often wasn’t pretty.
Yes, there were atrocities on both sides, and it probably was historically inevitable that the more technically advanced culture would prevail. Nevertheless, our treatment of the indigenous populations can never be totally defended.
In a better world, when the fighting finally ended, we would have worked out a sharing arrangement where both sides would have enjoyed equal citizenship rights and responsibilities. We would all have had the right to participate in the religious and social structures of our choosing, with no special legal status belonging to any group.
In short, we could all be Americans, a blessing sought after around the world.
That’s not what happened, of course. Instead, in the words of an 1881 Supreme Court ruling, the tribes were fashioned into separate “domestic independent nations” with a relationship like “that of a ward to his guardian.” The federal government began management of the land use and title management for millions of acres in Indian country.
Moreover, the government to a large extent assumed responsibility for the care and upkeep of these territories, including everything from schools and medical care to infrastructure projects and routine maintenance on reservations.
The result in hindsight was predictable. American Indians, no surprise, did not become the first group ever to achieve prosperity through welfare benefits. Instead, of all the racial minority groups in America, they today have the lowest average income, despite, or maybe because of, receiving the most economic aid from government.
In fact, of all our ethnic groups, the less access historically to entitlements they have received, the more wealthy they have become.
Also unsurprisingly, the federal government has done a notoriously terrible job of overseeing Indian economic affairs. For example, sixty-six million acres of land are held in trust by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), presumably to be managed for the Indians’ benefit. Yet the lands have produced minimal profits for the tribes.
The reservation lands contain abundant uranium, coal and gas reserves. Still, Senate hearings concluded that only two million of the fifteen million acres of energy reserves have been developed, leaving $1.5 trillion in underground resources untapped.
BIA rules or “white tape” often result in stricter regulations for tribes than for others. The result is that up to 49 steps can be required to obtain an oil lease in Indian country that requires four elsewhere. Excessive regulation also explains why valuable farmland is often left unused.
Before the European conquest, American Indians operated self-governing states in which they were “strong, self-sufficient, self-initiating, independent, powerful individuals,” according to an historian of the period. Now they’re trapped in a no-man’s land between citizenship and status as wards of the state. Worse, after living under these conditions, many Indians themselves have now developed the habits of chronic dependency.
Some sympathetic observers call for more effective supervision of Indian affairs. But bureaucracies are notoriously resistant to reform. Let’s work instead to achieve for our countrymen full status as free Americans.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed by an editor.
Discussion (6)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Banish the bureaucracy, end the system of reservations and let the Indians enjoy the benefits of unfettered citizenship. In a generation they will be indistinguishable from the general population.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I consider it utterly atrocious that American Indians ("native Americans" if you insist) were "allowed" to pretend to retain their "status" as "independent nations" and discouraged from being treated as the conquered people they really were. Keeping them as "independent nations" and thus separated from the general economic prosperity that has characterized American life has also kept them from participating in that general economic prosperity.
And, as you note, it also created this weird tendency for the American Indians to become dependent on government provisions, destroying their natural initiative and work ethic.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Who is the "historian of the period"?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The treaties were signed, I think, to bring shooting wars to an end. They weren’t some performative woke ‘do the noble savages a favour’ kind of thing.
They were also overwhelmingly treaties of surrender (surrendering land) on the part of native Americans. And they were also regularly breached by the US when it decided it wanted more land.
Seems pretty ‘conquered people’ tbh. Albeit conquered but not utterly destroyed.
How? Native Americans have been citizens since 1924 at least. I think they’ve been free to work wherever they want in the US before then. Most of them today don't live on reservations. What’s the causative mechanism?
If you look at other places with similarly conquered, displaced and outnumbered indigenous populations - eg Australia (no treaty), New Zealand (Treaty of Waitangi) - these populations seem to have similar issues to native Americans.
IMO there’s just something about being conquered, displaced and outnumbered by a technologically more advanced culture that causes some socioeconomic outcomes.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Is it allowed to blame the "Indians" themselves for much of this? Within their... sovereign sub-governments... they could have property ownership etc, same as the rest of the country. If they don't do so, by choice, perhaps because much of their ancient culture was basically socialist/communist and they're continuing that, isn't that on them?
You're seeing five of six comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.