3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Three Dot Lounge: How I Empty the ‘Boneyard’
March 12, 2025 at 7:02 AM

Three Dot Lounge: How I Empty the ‘Boneyard’

Rodin
@Rodin

MODERATOR

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark20likesJoin to like14comments

A fixture of San Francisco in the last half of the Twentieth Century was columnist Herb Caen. He became famous for his "Three Dot Lounge" of trenchant news/gossip items. He was the West Coast's answer to Walter Winchell. It was Twitter before anyone could bang on about something in 240 characters and publish it to the world.

In this post I am adopting something close to that approach, ridding myself of items in my "boneyard" -- draft posts that never went anywhere. The reason they didn't often was because I started with what I regarded as a bang-up idea but soon got lost in the weeds trying to make it all hold together logically and consistently. And there was always something new that kept me from going back and doing the post justice.

But here I am going to free myself of any attempt to do anything but introduce a point of view. Have at it with critique and/or amplification.

The "Yellow Peril"

The recent arrest of current and former military men of Chinese heritage involved in espionage reminds us of the challenges of a pluralistic society. Ill treatment based on race or ethnicity can always be a breeding ground for disloyalty -- take note, Ivy League. And the "motherland" is one of the three basic tools foreign agents use to turn Americans against us -- the other two being money and/or sex.

"Phew"!

My feeling after the November 5 results was not so much joy than sheer relief. Those of us who had been following Rich Baris, the People's Pundit, went into the night confident of the outcome but worried about a "hanging call" by the MSM. But such was the size of President Trump's victory the news gave it up before the post-election counting shenanigans could change the narrative.

The End of the "Beginning"

Winston Churchill famously said, in response to the first Allied victories recorded after three years of retreat and resistance, “Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.” The outcome of the November 5 election was not the end of our national nightmare. Happily, President Trump made it to, through, and beyond the inaugural and is starting, unevenly, the process of constitutional reform. But opposing forces remain allied if not yet fully efficient in their resistance.

The Most Malicious Myth (h/t Ann Althouse)

“Trump, Outrage and the Modern Era of Political Violence/The latest apparent assassination attempt against the former president indicates how much the American political landscape has been shaped by anger stirred by him and against him.” This was a NYT headline back in September. According to the NYT, without President Trump’s insertion into politics in 2015, we would be a peaceful country; that all ills begin and end with him. That is not true. What is true is that President Trump successfully personified existing unhappiness with the course our country was taking and offered, in exchange for political support, to take concrete steps to address that unhappiness. That he did that imperfectly or abrasively is totally beside the point. His great sin was gathering that political support and winning. Americans chose disruption over submission. It's not pretty, but it's very American.

The Darkness Weather Report

I have a theory, actually more of a notion really, that humans exist more than just temporally in the natural world. That is, human behavior is an outcome of natural forces, just as is fish behavior, whale behavior, bird behavior, and all other life forms. I do not rule out a “supernatural” element, but I attribute to that supernaturality (is that a word?) a set of rules or constraints that, if understood, would make its involvement ordered and not random. If true, human paroxysms should be predictable to some degree, like the weather. Seems like we are currently in a bit of fair weather between storms. But the storm lurks and we must be prepared.

The Challenge of Evil

I have been trying to elevate my focus beyond the discrete instances of outrage to the structures of the problems that seem to engulf us now. The first thing I consider is the extent to which we are actually facing new and more intense challenges than we have faced in my lifetime. If one is not paying attention and then is forced to, one can mistake inattention for relative peace and comfort. While there are a few things today that may be truly novel, most of our problems seem to be repackaging or updating old challenges we thought had been defeated.

The Long Fuse of Indeterminant Length

I understand that there is a philosophical disagreement over whether the Constitution is a fixed or “living” document. But giving the “living” approach free rein results in “anything goes” outcomes that are not predictable and simply an expression of power. A power hierarchy that is the end result of a fully realized “living” Constitution is indistinguishable from a prison. It might be a prison without walls, but a prison nonetheless. Everyone would know they were one misstep from losing everything. That would be true of everyone in the power hierarchy regardless of their own capability for self-deception which would give them an outsized feeling of security. The "living" Constitution is a fuse of indeterminate length, but certain outcome.

I Am A Partisan For Peace

I truly believe that there are some things worse than death, and that there are some things worse than war. But I am a partisan for peace. I am an old man now. I spent 40 years of my working life in support of American national defense. I responded favorably to the initiation of every military action in my lifetime, only to see the outcomes in every case being ambiguous at best and disastrous at worst. The major achievement of my lifetime in national defense was the disassembly of the Soviet Union. And that outcome was not the product of men in battle but the persistent pressure of a strong economic system vs. a weak one, with armaments sufficient to deter direct active aggression against official allies.

You Can't Campaign Against Compassion

Most Americans have a bit of “bleeding heart” in them. It’s in our DNA. Many Americans are descended from persons who underwent hardships and are sympathetic and charitable to others experiencing current hardship. No political campaign wins by campaigning against compassion. You are telling your voters that they are not the loving, kind humans they either think they are or aspire to be. Progressives understand this, thus they modify the language to make something that is fundamentally bad sound good and compassionate. So we are told to spend blood and treasure on endless foreign war to have peace; we are told to accept government dependence and control (slavery) to be free; we are told to restrict our speech and consumption to approved narratives (ignorance) to have all the information that we need (knowledge). It’s called “truth inversion,” and it is venal and deadly.

_____________

More to come.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (14)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Juliana@Juliana·1y

    Nothing like spring cleaning.

    The Darkness Weather Report

    I have a theory, actually more of a notion really, that humans exist more than just temporally in the natural world. That is, human behavior is an outcome of natural forces, just as is fish behavior, whale behavior, bird behavior, and all other life forms. I do not rule out a “supernatural” element, but I attribute to that supernaturality (is that word?) a set of rules or constraints that, if understood, would make its involvement ordered and not random. If true, human paroxysms should be predicable to some degree like the weather. Seems like we are currently in a bit of fair weather between storms. But the storm lurks and we must be prepared.

    The Challenge of Evil

    I have been trying to elevate my focus beyond the discrete instances of outrage to the structures for the problems that seem to engulf us now. The first thing I consider is the extent to which we are actually facing new and more intense challenges than we have faced in my lifetime. If one is not paying attention and then is forced to, one can mistake inattention for relative peace and comfort. While there are a few things today that may be truly novel, most of our problems seem to be repackaging or updating old challenges we thought had been defeated.

    I found these to be interesting and perhaps similar. Are the storms a function of evil? When things are going well, do we attribute it to our own personal good fortune, or is it just a time of fair weather? We all know that our lives could be upended in an instant, but until that instant arrives are we just oblivious to lurking danger/evil?

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Rodin@Rodin·1y
    ReplyingtoJuliana

    Juliana (View Comment):

    Nothing like spring cleaning.

    The Darkness Weather Report

    I have a theory, actually more of a notion really, that humans exist more than just temporally in the natural world. That is, human behavior is an outcome of natural forces, just as is fish behavior, whale behavior, bird behavior, and all other life forms. I do not rule out a “supernatural” element, but I attribute to that supernaturality (is that word?) a set of rules or constraints that, if understood, would make its involvement ordered and not random. If true, human paroxysms should be predicable to some degree like the weather. Seems like we are currently in a bit of fair weather between storms. But the storm lurks and we must be prepared.

    The Challenge of Evil

    I have been trying to elevate my focus beyond the discrete instances of outrage to the structures for the problems that seem to engulf us now. The first thing I consider is the extent to which we are actually facing new and more intense challenges than we have faced in my lifetime. If one is not paying attention and then is forced to, one can mistake inattention for relative peace and comfort. While there are a few things today that may be truly novel, most of our problems seem to be repackaging or updating old challenges we thought had been defeated.

    I found these to be interesting and perhaps similar. Are the storms a function of evil? When things are going well, do we attribute it to our own personal good fortune, or is it just a time of fair weather? We all know that our lives could be upended in an instant, but until that instant arrives are we just oblivious to lurking danger/evil?

    We face two types of cataclysms in our lives: one that is unique to us and one that is common to many including us. My two observations were based on the latter and involve growing behaviors such as mass formation psychosis that begin to envelop almost everyone. To see the storm coming permits preparation with varying degrees of success in mitigating or avoiding trouble. We are used to recognizing that in the weather, much less so in the herding behavior of our fellow human beings.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y
    ReplyingtoRodin

    Rodin (View Comment):

    We face two types of cataclysms in our lives: one that is unique to us and one that is common to many including us. My two observations were based on the latter and involve growing behaviors such as mass formation psychosis that begin to envelop almost everyone. To see the storm coming permits preparation with varying degrees of success in mitigating or avoiding trouble. We are used to recognizing that in the weather, much less so in the herding behavior of our fellow human beings.

    The avoidance tactics aren't that different: relocate to a better environment/safer surroundings.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Red Herring@EHerring·1y

    Excellent.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·1y
    Rodin (View Post):

    You Can’t Campaign Against Compassion

    Most Americans have a bit of “bleeding heart” in them. It’s in our DNA. Many Americans are descended from persons who underwent hardships and are sympathetic and charitable to others experiencing current hardship. No political campaign wins by campaigning against compassion. You are telling your voters that they are not the loving, kind humans they either think they are or aspire to be. Progressives understand this, thus they modify language to make something that is fundamentally bad sound good and compassionate. So we are told to spend blood and treasure on endless foreign war to have peace; we are told to accept government dependance and control (slavery) to be free; we are told to restrict our speech and consumption to approved narratives (ignorance) to have all the information that we need (knowledge). It’s called “truth inversion” and it is venal and deadly.

    I especially liked this one. I think people misunderstand many things about compassion. To one degree or another, most people have a cache of compassion. The question isn't whether you have it, but when you use or display it. For example, because you "feel" compassionate" doesn't mean you should act on it. Or if in a given situation, you aren't moved to compassion, but are motivated to assist someone, you might just act. The key is not blindly acting on compassion, but paradoxically analyzing why you are so moved, if your help will benefit the other or not, if you can afford to help, and so on. In other words, don't offer compassion willynilly (like that word). Be thoughtful and discriminating. Don't call it something that it is not.

Scroll for later comments
+9 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 14 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •