3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Mamdani’s Budget Balanced on the Backs of Union Pensions
May 13, 2026 at 11:57 PM

Mamdani’s Budget Balanced on the Backs of Union Pensions

Ekosj
@Ekosj

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark17likesJoin to like26comments

The State of NY caved to Mamdani and provided $4 billion to balance NYC’s $124 billion budget. That total includes $2.3 billion in “pension restructuring.”

Turns out what that really means is the state OK’d the city postponing legally required pension contributions to public employee union pension plans from 2032 to 2037. Which, as luck would have it, just happens to be after he’s out of office (assuming he continues to be elected).

What a coincidence!

So much for “accounting for the mismanagement we’ve seen in prior years and embarking on a new chapter of an approach to budgeting that is honest and that is actually building for long-term stability.”

How’s that free stuff working out for you, NYC union folks?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (26)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Stad@Stad·22w
    Ekosj (View Post):

    How’s that free stuff working out for you NYC Union folks?

    I don't think they've even gotten any free stuff yet, and may not at all . . .

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Terence Smith@TerrySmith·22w

    My first thought was that the pension shortfall will eventually be picked up by Uncle Sam. It will be paid for by increasing the federal debt.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Ekosj@Ekosj·22w
    ReplyingtoTerence Smith

    Terence Smith (View Comment):

    My first thought was that the pension shortfall will eventually be picked up by Uncle Sam. It will be paid for by increasing the federal debt.

    If not by them then by NY State.

    There is a great old Soviet-era joke they used to tell in Poland. Party officials in Gdansk become aware that Stash - who has a well-paying job in the shipyards there - doesn't have a bank account. He cashes his check, takes the money and goes home. What is he doing with it? IS he a drug addict? IS he financing some subversive anti-social group? They send an apparatchik round to Stash's flat to see what's up. He asks Stash directly why he doesn't have a bank account. Stash explains that is nothing nefarious. But he knows those idiots at the Bank of Gdansk. Went to school with them. They are morons. There is no way he's going to let them have control of a single zloty. He's happier with the bills tucked under his mattress.

    The apparatchik explains that there is no reason to fear. True, the people at the Bank of Gdansk might be idiots ... but if anything goes wrong the Bank of Warsaw will bail them out and Stash's money will be safe. Stash counters ... You think the people in Warsaw are any better than the Gdansk guys? Haaa! I see them at the soccer matches ... they are just as dumb as the guys in Gdansk! Again the apparatchik explains ... maybe so but if the Bank of Warsaw fails the Bank of Poland will bail them out. Stash isn't convinced. Yeah ... And if the Bank of Poland fails ... What then? The apparatchik counters that if that unlikely event occurred their fraternal socialist brothers at the Bank of Moscow would bail them out. And if THEY failed the Central Bank of the Soviet Union would take care of things. Stash shakes his head ... And what if the Soviet Union went bankrupt ... what then smart guy ?!?!?!

    The apparatchik pauses and carefully examines the room making sure they are well and truly alone then replies "Wouldn't it be worth it?!?!?"

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    GlennAmurgis@GlennAmurgis·22w

    Professional beggar gets a sugar daddy (the state taxpayers) to pay the bills

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Mark Camp@MarkCamp·22w
    ReplyingtoTerence Smith

    Terence Smith (View Comment):

    My first thought was that the pension shortfall will eventually be picked up by Uncle Sam.

    That is one of the strategies of the currently predominant branch of the socialist movement in America, which favors a mostly-peaceful, gradual collapse of the American system by co-opting its own political institutions and processes to subvert it. It has worked before and it might work in this case, too. There is no longer a very powerful institutional resistance to it in America.

    Terence Smith (View Comment):

    It will be paid for by increasing the federal debt.

    We can agree that that is not false*.

    * * *

    *Note:

    This is not the place to debate whether

    1. it is true, which necessarily implies that money is not fungible, or
    2. money is fungible, which necessarily implies it is not false, but also not true, since it is statement without any meaning: Treasury’s checking account doesn’t have little boxes in it with dollar bills marked “Hi, I came from Goldman Sachs last August when they bought a T-Bill, and now I am going to the NYC Treasury checking account!”
Scroll for later comments
+21 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 26 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •