Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I was watching a football game with a friend some years ago, and a defensive lineman knocked Tom Brady down. Well, he reached around the guy who was blocking him and shoved Brady from behind, who then fell down. The referee called roughing the passer. My friend and I both played football in our youth, and we were offended by the destruction of the game we love. I pointed out that football is a game of risk and reward. If you want to send out more receivers and keep fewer guys in to block, then you’re risking your QB getting hurt. It’s the job of the offensive coordinator to protect the QB, not the refs. That’s what makes football interesting.
My friend took a less nuanced approach: “Modern society has become too feminized for football.” That made sense to inebriated me, pretty much. A feminized society avoids risk of all kinds. Okay, I guess. Until later that night, when we watched UFC (Mixed Martial Arts – some call it cage fighting). They had a couple of fights on the card between women. My friend and I didn’t watch these. We feel dirty, watching women get beat up. We returned to the TV after one of the female fights, and the losing fighter looked more than a little roughed up.
I turned to my friend and said, “Okay, Mr. Genius. Our society can’t watch a defensive lineman sack a quarterback because we’re too feminized. But we can watch a woman just get beat to a pulp? While Tom Brady is protected from all possible harm? Because we value women? Could you explain that to me?” Both of us had had too much bourbon to explain anything at that point. But we remained stumped even when we sobered up.
Now, of course, we have moved past protecting football players. We’ve also moved past women beating up other women for our entertainment. We have now moved to The Brave New World of men beating up women for our entertainment.
Why? Because society has become too feminized.
I think. Well, something like that. Perhaps.
What’s going on? Men have become feminized, women have become masculinized, they’re all miserable, sales of psychiatric drugs have exploded, we’re putting tampons in middle school boys' school bathrooms, the oilfield pipeline welder in the TV ad for pickup trucks is always a black woman, the sports I love have been destroyed for no apparent reason, and I can’t watch TV without feeling sort of odd, like I’ve entered a parallel dimension which is sort of like Earth, but very different as well.
It's just surreal. The world I live in seems perfectly normal. But the world on TV looks foreign and bizarre. I’m watching American TV channels, and I feel like a pilgrim in a foreign land.
The part that keeps tripping me up is the question: “Why?”
Why is the left doing this? They claim to champion women’s rights. Heck, the left pushed Title 9 through just a few decades ago to protect women’s sports. And now they’re putting men in women’s sports. Why? This doesn’t help women. It doesn’t get them votes from their supporters. Why are they doing this?
If leftists consider men to be evil, then why do they want women to be more like men? What’s with the men beating up women on TV? The trans-sexual fad makes no sense to me. Why? We put a man on the moon the year after I was born. And now we can’t seem to figure out which bathroom to use. What the heck is going on?
Why? Why does the left feel this sexual chaos is so important? Democrat leaders were once normal people who liked centralized control systems. Now they seem like alien life forms. While my friends who are Democrat voters still seem like normal people. Why is the leadership of the Democrat party intentionally making themselves look alien and scary? What possible benefit is there for them in that approach?
Why are they doing this?
This is costing them the support of a lot of people. People who vote Democrat because Dan Rather told them that Republicans are mean. But people who are aware of the existence of reality. People like that. All this sexual chaos is costing Democrats a lot. It must be.
So why are they doing it? How does it help them?
I just don’t understand…
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (64)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To be a leftist you have to pretend things that are impossible can be achieved and also you have to pretend not to know things .
This is the thinking of all the Democrats I work with . Also , if the ugly truth does seep in like chicks with you know what . They , although they do not approve , convince themselves that it's not as bad as Trump and it is a fad that will fade . This brings us back to pretending not to know things . Wash , rinse , repeat !
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
With sports being a half trillion dollar industry, the days of losing stars to tough hits is gone. Football, hockey and even baseball. It you want to watch low talent people beat each other up, you are stick with games from the 70's.
That said, living it in The Matriarchy worries me. My history book (probably written by men) does not have any examples of a feminized society doing well. Effeminate Western countries are about 10% of the population on the planet and choosing not to have kids. I give it 50 years for this experiment to have run its course. On our epitaph, they can write "Death by Cat Ladies".
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Again, I'm not sure it's that straightforward.
I'm not sure what this is. But it's not feminine.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I don't know much about football. Don't care much about it either, but I hear it discussed in the background when the sports news is on the radio. From what I've absorbed over the years, there are 32 starting QBs in the league and one third of them are marginally competent at the job. I'd guess that means that playing that position in the NFL is the hardest job in all of sports. You have a decent supporting cast and prime-time Tom Brady and you're a winning team with a shot at going deep in the playoffs. Take Brady out due to serious injury and suddenly you're a break even team that might miss post-season. Probably the same could be said about four or five other "franchise quarterbacks". Also, the fans pay to see spectacular plays that evidently only top-tier quarterbacks can deliver. To me, that explains why quarterbacks are protected.
As to why women like to beat each other up and why anyone will pay to watch, well, I'm as confused on that subject as you apparently are.
You're seeing five of 64 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.