Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
A lot of ink has been spilled over the MOST HISTORIC OIL DEAL IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD that Trump announced last week. But much of the hysteria is misplaced because few people know what was actually agreed and who the players really are.
First, consider the structure of the deal. Venezuela is transferring 17 oil concessions to North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP), which has a total of 65 billion barrels of proved reserves (about 20% of Venezuela's total proved reserves). NABEP will invest $100B in refurbishing the fields and oil infrastructure.
The US government gets a 35% interest in NABEP through the DoW's Office of Strategic Capital. The US is given its stake and doesn't have to purchase it. I'm not clear whether it will have to pay its share of future capital calls, which would be significant. The Dept. of State will be able to purchase 20% of NABEP's output at the cost of production and has the right to purchase the remaining 80% at market prices. Given that it is expensive to produce Venezuela's heavy, tarry crude with its high sulfur content, the right to purchase 20% at production cost is not as valuable as getting the same deal for light, sweet Saudi crude. But it is still a significant benefit.
NABEP is headquartered in Barbados, and all its other offices are in Venezuela. Many claim it is an American company, but I can't find any evidence of this. It will have to meet US audit standards under the terms of the deal, and a majority of its directors must be American. But this is much less important than it seems because it is easy for a corrupt company to meet US audit standards, and it's easy to find compliant American directors.
The power behind NABEP is Alejandro Betancourt, who made his fortune in the early years under Chavez in petroleum and power plants. He has been investigated for corruption and money-laundering in the US, Switzerland, and Spain, but he has not yet been indicted. He is accused of stealing massive amounts under Chavez from government contracts to build power plants. He has invested his fortune outside Venezuela, in the US and Europe primarily—hence the money laundering accusations.
Betancourt was instrumental in the overthrow of Maduro and VP Delcy Rodriguez taking the reins of government.
NABEP is currently the third largest oil company in Venezuela, behind the state-owned Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. and Chevron. Because Venezuela's oil fields and infrastructure are so run-down, it will take massive investment to make its 17 new fields profitable. Thus, the requirement is to invest $100B. But NABEP has little technical or managerial expertise, so it will have to bring in many American contractors to refurbish the fields. The organization will also have to raise massive sums of capital, and who will want to invest billions in a company inescapably corrupted by operating in the politically risky Venezuelan environment? The only accomplishment shown on the NABEP website is refurbishing the GP-28 drill barge. This is a far cry from working over neglected wells, rebuilding pipelines and processing facilities, and managing giant projects. It looks like the dog that caught the car.
Before now, several of the 17 fields were operated by Chinese and Russian companies, so it is good that they are being kicked out.
On August 8, NABEP kicked out one of its large minority shareholders, Harry Sargeant III. Sargeant was under US sanctions (from the Trump I administration) for working with Maduro, so this was a cleanup item. Sargeant's share was 30%, so the US government is basically getting this share.
The crazy part of this deal is that it is drawing the US deeper into Venezuela's corrupt oil politics. Defense and State now have a stake in the fortunes of Delcy Rodriguez and Betancourt. This reminds me of the banana politics of the Central American countries that pulled American politicians and Marines into corrupt governments. NABEP's 100-year concessions are stirring significant resentment in Venezuela, and PDVSA has a lot of power—they will be working to undermine the deal.
All players must be concerned about the longevity of the deal. Will it survive the end of the Trump II administration? Will it survive the end of Delcy Rodriguez's rule? Do Trump or any of his family members have a personal stake in NABEP? Will NABEP be able to attract even a large part of the required $100B investment? Will it attract competent technical and managerial talent to manage its massive new projects? I'm guessing that by 2030 the deal will either be canceled or significantly restructured, but there will be a lot of corruption and messiness before then.
It is terrible for the US government to take a stake in foreign oil fields. It will divert DoW and State attention from their main jobs, respectively, of killing people and breaking things and defending American diplomatic interests. And it will embroil us in corrupt, nasty local politics of the type that created so much anti-American resentment in Central America.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (54)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Gee, maybe I should submit my resume?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Are you corrupt enough?
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Two more points:
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
No idea, but I have the same name as an oil services company and get constant e-mails from Chinese companies who mix us up. It must be time to get into that business. (The company is named after a city which is named after a distant cousin of mine.)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
My thoughts on particular comments:
This follows Trump’s rejuvenated Monroe Doctrine. I’m all for preventing their foothold on assets in the three Americas..
It supports Trump’s rejuninated Monroe Docrine. The alternatives, empowering drug cartels, Russia, and China, would create more distractions for those two departments. It sends a @kerp out” message to our adversaries. They have been meddling in the three Americas for far too long. Trump is rolling that back.
Agree, and that money would be hard to come by without our government’s security umbrella. Will it work? We will see. If we do nothing, China and Russia will invest and control it.
The founders put a lot of energy into to our Constitution not knowing how long it would work. “A republic, if you can keep it.” Entrepreneurs are needed to do great things. They take risks. Sometimes they fail. Trump is an entrepreneur. Politicians seeking reelection are not. Our biggest problem is too many voters are afraid of risks and responsibility. They choose nanny state security over liberty, personal benefits over national security. Elections have consequences, consequences that don’t always have the best interest of the country at heart.
Or it might help alleviate corruption. Re resentment in the past, countries are learning from their mistakes. We are more popular now. Wish our Democrats would learn from mistakes made elsewhere.
We started with 13 states and now have 50. Sometimes a little touch of imperialism is a good thing. Countries with British heritage do better than other 3rd world countries.
You're seeing five of 54 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.