The Superfeed
The Ricochet Podcast3 Whisky Happy HourBeyond the PollsGLoP CultureDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowFederalist Radio HourNot Dead YetHeritage ExplainsChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchCall Me Back - with Dan SenorThe Learning CurveThe American IdeaThe Radio Free Hillsdale HourHillsdale DialoguesMadison’s NotesMom WarsWhat the Hell Is Going OnParsing Immigration PolicyFreedom to LearnConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Conservative Woman’s GuideLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Back of the BookThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorGray MattersThe Report Card with Nat MalkusFirst Things PodcastThe Glenn ShowThe LibertarianMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHubwonk
HostsOrganizations

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  1. Main Feed/
  2. The Magician’s Twin, with David Berlinski, Stephen Meyer, and James Orr
July 18, 2024 at 6:48 PM

The Magician’s Twin, with David Berlinski, Stephen Meyer, and James Orr

Peter Robinson
@PeterRobinson

FOUNDER

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark6likesJoin to like5comments

In his 1943 book The Abolition of Man, C. S. Lewis wrote: “The serious magical endeavor and the serious scientific endeavor are twins: One was sickly and died, the other strong and throve. But they were twins. They were born of the same impulse.” In this Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson, mathematician and philosopher David Berlinski, intelligent design advocate Stephen Meyer, and Associate Professor of Philosophy of Religion at Cambridge University, James Orr explore the parallels between scientific and magical endeavors, referencing C. S. Lewis's notion that both were born from the same impulse, with one thriving and the other fading. They also explore the historical relationship between science and religion, noting how early scientists such as Newton and Galileo saw their work as uncovering divine order, in contrast with the more secular views of modern scientists such as Steven Weinberg and Stephen Hawking. The discussion also reveals deep philosophical and historical insights into the evolution of scientific thought and its complex relationship with materialism and religion.

Recorded on May 26th, 2024

Promoted by an EditorThis post was promoted to the Main Feed by an editor.

Discussion (5)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·2y

    Peter Robinson's patented interview persona (the unpretentious, likeable, deferential layman who just happens to be thoroughly well-read and meticulously prepared) ought to have a name or designation of some kind so future generations know who and what to emulate when doing interviews.

    This particular panel was a treat. Brilliant men able to provide novel (to me anyway) perspectives on issues, great works and some of the perennial great questions in a few eloquent words is a gift. Their disagreements were even more informative and enlightening than their respective takes on the questions which is saying a lot.

    A century ago, inquisitive minds would have to be smart, hard-working and lucky to attend schools where this level of discussion could be heard. And now it's available at a click anytime, anywhere, an easy availability that likely disguises its enormous value.

    By the way, I highly recommend this podcast in case you couldn't tell.

  • M

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    MiMac@MiMac·2y

    Peter needs to do more interviews!

  • C

    CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    colleenb@colleenb·2y
    ReplyingtoOld Bathos

    Old Bathos (View Comment):

    Peter Robinson’s patented interview persona (the unpretentious, likeable, deferential layman who just happens to be thoroughly well-read and meticulously prepared) ought to have a name or designation of some kind so future generations know who and what to emulate when doing interviews.

    This particular panel was a treat. Brilliant men able to provide novel (to me anyway) perspectives on issues, great works and some of the perennial great questions in a few eloquent words is a gift. Their disagreements were even more informative and enlightening than their respective takes on the questions which is saying a lot.

    A century ago, inquisitive minds would have to be smart, hard-working and lucky to attend schools where this level of discussion could be heard. And now it’s available at a click anytime, anywhere, an easy availability that likely disguises its enormous value.

    By the way, I highly recommend this podcast in case you couldn’t tell.

    Agree completely. That final quote from Newton blew me away.

  • C

    CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    colleenb@colleenb·2y
    ReplyingtoMiMac

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Peter needs to do more interviews!

    There are more interviews. We do not get all of them on Ricochet.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Old Bathos@OldBathos·2y
    Replyingtocolleenb

    MiMac (View Comment):

    Peter needs to do more interviews!

    colleenb (View Comment):

    There are more interviews. We do not get all of them on Ricochet.

    See,

    hoover.org

    Open link

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •