Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The American Idea
Federalist Radio Hour
The Erick Erickson Show
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
There is a common expression that Europeans work to live, while Americans live to work. Europeans always feel a little smug about this, since work is surely not the purpose of existence!
But I think there is a much better way to frame the question. Think about it instead as whether we care about the present or the future. Do we invest in the future – at the cost of the present? We might call that “live to work.”
Or do we maximize our enjoyment of the present – at the cost of the future? Isn’t that more or less the same as working to live? Which is also Europe writ large – a continent of childless people who plan to die before it all goes bad?
Those of us who invest in the future settle down, get married, and have children, investing considerable resources into the next generation, because that generation is the future. The long-term gains are wonderful, but the short-term costs are undeniable.
So the next time someone quotes "work to live" at me, I'll turn it around and ask if they have mortgaged their futures, like Aesop's Grasshopper, in return for fun today.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (14)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
My work in ministry helps others to live. The work of others does the same. Where does that fit in this paradigm?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You are investing in the long term, right?
And your service is to enable others - that is the very epitome of society that takes the long view, instead of the selfish hedonistic path.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I just read your profile. Working in hospice is incredible work. Your impact on the living makes a huge difference to their perspectives and futures.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
There's something that's so absurd about the "work to live" or "live to work". Many people pursue work that is meaningful in itself and contributes to the lives of others.
They are living their best life as they work.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That is very consistent with my point.
You're seeing five of 14 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.