3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Scrooge figured it out
December 24, 2023 at 6:41 PM

Scrooge figured it out

Dr. Bastiat
@drbastiat

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark39likesJoin to like18comments

I listened to a great podcast today: “History of Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol”. I learned a lot about this fascinating book, and enjoyed the discussion. But it reminded me of a part of the story that had always bothered me. Scrooge is obviously supposed to be the villain, but Dickens is uncharacteristically subtle in his design of this complex character. I always felt that Scrooge was simply written to represent adulthood, and that the story was about Scrooge’s journey back to childhood. I’ve read analysts that believed that Scrooge couldn’t reach the salvation of Jesus Christ until he completed this journey back to his original state as a child, much as God came to Earth in the form of a child.

There’s a lot of fascinating stuff there, but the basic concept bothers me. Like Rousseau’s worship of the noble savage, Dickens tended to put more faith in the innocence of youth than he did in those who faced the grim realities of the world (and with his childhood, this is a perfectly understandable hangup). And there is something to the idea that we can only approach God when we have left our worldly concerns behind (including all that comes with adulthood, like earning a living, and other things that Scrooge understood). And even in our post-Christian society, we seem to grasp the sense of freedom gained from giving oneself over to God and trusting completely in his love and wisdom, as you can see in everything from “Jesus Take the Wheel” to “Groundhog Day” to “Mary Poppins” and so on.

But while I can accept all that, I still find it hard to believe that as I move further and further into adulthood, that I move further and further away from God. My willingness to take on responsibilities for others somehow makes me less compassionate. My long work hours make me less dedicated to things that really matter. My financial responsibility makes me misguided. It’s tricky stuff, but I struggle to understand that only by abandoning maturity and responsibility can I hope to gain the favor of God.

I rationalize this troubling aspect of this brilliant book by supposing that Scrooge is not an adult who must become a child to gain God’s favor, but rather that he is a control freak who must forfeit his arrogance to be capable of accepting God’s grace. Scrooge thinks he can plan and build, lacking the perspective of the Proverbs admonition that man plans and God laughs.

He’s not abandoning adult maturity and responsibility. He’s abandoning human arrogance and desire for power.

Charles Dickens’ disdain for the wealthy would probably make him a Democrat today. But he may have unintentionally illustrated one of the great flaws of modern leftism in his brilliant, brilliant book: Human arrogance and desire for power tend to lead to evil, like Scrooge early in the book. When we seek power over others, it tends to lead to misery and suffering.

We should take care of our immediate responsibilities, and leave the God stuff to God. As Scrooge did later in the book.

Scrooge figured it out. Leftists have not.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (18)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Saint Augustine@SaintAugustine·2y
    Dr. Bastiat (View Post):

    He’s not abandoning adult maturity and responsibility. He’s abandoning human arrogance and desire for power.

    Thank you.

    Yes.

    There may be more, but . . . yes. This is good. Thank you.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    MikeMcCarthy@MikeMcCarthy·2y

    Like the left, he has chosen a joyless life in pursuit of meaningless things

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    MarciN@MarciN·2y

    The movie version with George C. Scott is on our yearly Christmas movie list. Every year I see something I had missed before. This year it struck me that it was the stirring of love for Tiny Tim that finally warmed Scrooge's heart irrevocably.

    The other point about A Christmas Carol is the era in which it was written and published: 1842.

    What follows is not my own revelation about this particular historical period. I spent a few years delving into the Civil War, and I learned in a book by the historian James McPherson that the 1840s saw the development of millions of factories in the great cities of the world, including Boston.

    McPherson noted that in the 1840s, Horace Mann, the first secretary of education in Massachusetts, looked out on Boston's city streets and saw them filled with thousands of unsupervised and uncared for children whose parents were working in the Boston area factories. Horace Mann set out to improve Massachusetts public schools. His thinking was that parents weren't bothering to support their children's education even minimally because it wouldn't do the kids any good. He wanted to change that, to see the public schools pursue some level of excellence and win over the parents.

    In his book Ordeal by Fire, McPherson wrote that at about the same time, Karl Marx was writing Das Kapital from his jail cell in London.

    Education as a way to uplift the poor, to give them an asset to build their lives around, was what Horace Mann envisioned. In contrast, we have Marxism. It's a fascinating perspective on poverty.

    Charles Dickins was definitely in that era of social worrying about the poor. :) :)

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Eridemus@Eridemus·2y
    And in these times isn't there the opposite trap (I've see too many fall into) of "staying" immature in order to shift adult responsibility onto others, which is arrested development in the individual besides being unfair to those (friends and relatives) who do face life and its responsibilities?. In asking us to shoulder others under temporary or even long-term difficulty, does God not recognize the giver as benevolent (if not done begrudgingly)? The tricky part is when the troubled person(s) have gotten there pretty much due to a pattern of personal lapses and not random adversity. At a larger scale, conservatives are suspicious of the risk of encouraging dependent behavior by growth of anonymous public welfare...and the parallel growth of government needed to manage it.
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    AMD Texas@DarinJohnson·2y
    ReplyingtoMikeMcCarthy

    MikeMcCarthy (View Comment):

    Like the left, he has chosen a joyless life in pursuit of meaningless things

    That's not just a hallmark of the left...in my experience anyway

Scroll for later comments
+13 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 18 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •