Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
I listened to a great podcast today: “History of Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol”. I learned a lot about this fascinating book, and enjoyed the discussion. But it reminded me of a part of the story that had always bothered me. Scrooge is obviously supposed to be the villain, but Dickens is uncharacteristically subtle in his design of this complex character. I always felt that Scrooge was simply written to represent adulthood, and that the story was about Scrooge’s journey back to childhood. I’ve read analysts that believed that Scrooge couldn’t reach the salvation of Jesus Christ until he completed this journey back to his original state as a child, much as God came to Earth in the form of a child.
There’s a lot of fascinating stuff there, but the basic concept bothers me. Like Rousseau’s worship of the noble savage, Dickens tended to put more faith in the innocence of youth than he did in those who faced the grim realities of the world (and with his childhood, this is a perfectly understandable hangup). And there is something to the idea that we can only approach God when we have left our worldly concerns behind (including all that comes with adulthood, like earning a living, and other things that Scrooge understood). And even in our post-Christian society, we seem to grasp the sense of freedom gained from giving oneself over to God and trusting completely in his love and wisdom, as you can see in everything from “Jesus Take the Wheel” to “Groundhog Day” to “Mary Poppins” and so on.
But while I can accept all that, I still find it hard to believe that as I move further and further into adulthood, that I move further and further away from God. My willingness to take on responsibilities for others somehow makes me less compassionate. My long work hours make me less dedicated to things that really matter. My financial responsibility makes me misguided. It’s tricky stuff, but I struggle to understand that only by abandoning maturity and responsibility can I hope to gain the favor of God.
I rationalize this troubling aspect of this brilliant book by supposing that Scrooge is not an adult who must become a child to gain God’s favor, but rather that he is a control freak who must forfeit his arrogance to be capable of accepting God’s grace. Scrooge thinks he can plan and build, lacking the perspective of the Proverbs admonition that man plans and God laughs.
He’s not abandoning adult maturity and responsibility. He’s abandoning human arrogance and desire for power.
Charles Dickens’ disdain for the wealthy would probably make him a Democrat today. But he may have unintentionally illustrated one of the great flaws of modern leftism in his brilliant, brilliant book: Human arrogance and desire for power tend to lead to evil, like Scrooge early in the book. When we seek power over others, it tends to lead to misery and suffering.
We should take care of our immediate responsibilities, and leave the God stuff to God. As Scrooge did later in the book.
Scrooge figured it out. Leftists have not.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (18)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Thank you.
Yes.
There may be more, but . . . yes. This is good. Thank you.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Like the left, he has chosen a joyless life in pursuit of meaningless things
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The movie version with George C. Scott is on our yearly Christmas movie list. Every year I see something I had missed before. This year it struck me that it was the stirring of love for Tiny Tim that finally warmed Scrooge's heart irrevocably.
The other point about A Christmas Carol is the era in which it was written and published: 1842.
What follows is not my own revelation about this particular historical period. I spent a few years delving into the Civil War, and I learned in a book by the historian James McPherson that the 1840s saw the development of millions of factories in the great cities of the world, including Boston.
McPherson noted that in the 1840s, Horace Mann, the first secretary of education in Massachusetts, looked out on Boston's city streets and saw them filled with thousands of unsupervised and uncared for children whose parents were working in the Boston area factories. Horace Mann set out to improve Massachusetts public schools. His thinking was that parents weren't bothering to support their children's education even minimally because it wouldn't do the kids any good. He wanted to change that, to see the public schools pursue some level of excellence and win over the parents.
In his book Ordeal by Fire, McPherson wrote that at about the same time, Karl Marx was writing Das Kapital from his jail cell in London.
Education as a way to uplift the poor, to give them an asset to build their lives around, was what Horace Mann envisioned. In contrast, we have Marxism. It's a fascinating perspective on poverty.
Charles Dickins was definitely in that era of social worrying about the poor. :) :)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That's not just a hallmark of the left...in my experience anyway
You're seeing five of 18 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.