3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenGray MattersDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowGiving VenturesMom Wars3 Martini LunchChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenThe Back of the BookMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Social Security & The Free Rider Problem
February 25, 2025 at 7:32 AM

Social Security & The Free Rider Problem

JosephCox
@JosephCox

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark23likesJoin to like76comments

There is a slowly unfolding global catastrophe being driven by two factors:

  1. Public pensions
  2. Birth control

The second provides unfettered access to one of our core pleasures without all the pesky little side effects (or at least the ones that crawl and ask for your car keys). The second ensures that other peoples' pesky little side effects — which are quite expensive and time-consuming, by the way — will pay for your old age.

The result?

A massive free rider problem — the largest in human history. Humanity is about to get a lot older, and as we've removed the need to rely on our own offspring, there suddenly aren't enough offspring. This has an impact not only on public pensions but on private savings as well. If there aren't enough producers, then you will see (and are seeing) long-term inflation as labor becomes more and more expensive and rare.

Is all hope lost? Maybe not. Taking the US as a particular case, imagine this mitigation:

  • For those 35 and younger, they will receive their full social security when they retire so long as their own children (adopted or not, it is the cost and trouble of raising children that we're dealing with) are contributing more to the program than they (the old folks) consume.
  • Any amount contributed by the children, beyond what their own old folks consume, would be distributed to others eligible for social security — up to 100% of their previously specified benefit.
  • Any amount beyond that would be part of the social security surplus - as presently defined.

It is highly aggressive... then again, the US, EU, China and others are in serious trouble. If you're infertile or unmarried, well, you won't be spending all that money on kids, so you should save more for yourself. If your kid is a washout, that sucks. Maybe have a spare, and try and raise children capable of earning a living.

Could this approach mitigate the upcoming catastrophe by reintroducing the traditional economic relationship between the generations?

I am wearing my flame-proof suit and ready for your fireballs!

Full disclosure: I have six kids and I live in a country that is well above the replacement rate for children. Israel is the only OECD country not facing this free-rider problem... Thus, for me, this is more of a thought experiment than a personal challenge. In other words, I don't feel your pain.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (76)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    sawatdeeka@sawatdeeka·1y

    We just need these fresh ideas. Keeping the status quo is tepid.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    cdor@cdor·1y

    I wonder if ricochet is the correct venue for this conversation. Somehow, I get the feeling that the membership here is well above 35 years old. That does not make you incorrect in your assumptions, but to be heard you should be on TikTok.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    JosephCox@JosephCox·1y
    Replyingtocdor

    cdor (View Comment):

    I wonder if ricochet is the correct venue for this conversation. Somehow, I get the feeling that the membership here is well above 35 years old. That does not make you incorrect in your assumptions, but to be heard you should be on TikTok.

    Yours is the demographic that protects the status quo :)

    Although I'll admit it took me more than 35 years to have 6 kids...

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Columbo@Columbo·1y

    Every "for profit" company eliminated pensions a LONG time ago. Yes, the government is always late, but this is ridiculous. Everyone who works for the government tried and failed to work in the private sector, or they wouldn't be on the government payroll now. First freeze and eliminate public pensions. Then end public sector unions. Even FDR knew that they were an oxymoron. All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Postmodern Hoplite@PostmodernHoplite·1y
    Replyingtocdor

    cdor (View Comment):

    I wonder if ricochet is the correct venue for this conversation. Somehow, I get the feeling that the membership here is well above 35 years old. That does not make you incorrect in your assumptions, but to be heard you should be on TikTok.

    I don’t know…maybe you’re right, but it will take convincing a pretty sizable chunk of the over-62 cohort to accept lower benefits to make any meaningful correction happen. I have two sons (35 and 33 years old, respectively) and one grandson (1 yo). In hindsight, I wish my wife and I’d had at least one more, and that we would have four grandchildren now.

    I’m just sayin’…

Scroll for later comments
+71 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 76 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •