Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
Mom Wars
The Back of the Book
Gray Matters
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Geoff Pullum’s new book, The Truth About English Grammar, is a stylish and witty introduction to English grammar as it ought to be understood. Most of what is taught to schoolchildren about grammar is nonsense, as he demonstrates, and here he offers general readers a modern description of how our language puts sentences together, freed from the straitjacket of Latin grammar wrongfully imposed on it for the last few centuries.
Did you have to learn how to conjugate verbs? I did. Six tenses, 1st/2nd/3rd person, singular/plural, 36 in all. Nope. Regular English verbs have four forms—walk, walks, walking, walked. Irregular verbs have five—take, takes, taking, took, taken. And be, all alone among English verbs, has eight—be; am, is, are, was, were; being; been.
Pullum is a named co-author, with Rodney Huddleston, of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, published in 2002. I bought myself a copy for Christmas one year, all 1,860 pages (and I actually read hundreds of them).
CamGEL describes English as it is actually spoken and written by competent speakers, using the methods developed by linguists over several decades to document unfamiliar languages. As a grad student in linguistics, I took a course in “field methods.” The TA was a native speaker of Oromo (an Afroasiatic language spoken in Ethiopia). We could ask her “How do you say…” questions, and we had to use her answers to construct a model of the Oromo language.
Though the CamGEL authors are not only familiar with English, but authoritatively knowledgeable about it, they have a similar goal: A description of the English language that is accurate, clear, and free of preconceptions about what it should be like.
Pullum aims to use modern insights about the structure of English syntax as a framework for the extensive, but commonly subconscious, knowledge fluent speakers have of their own language.
Our Oromo informant was quite surprised by some of the things we discovered about her language, which she knew and used but had never noticed.
Though grammar properly refers solely to how a language makes sentences, Pullum adds chapters on mythical grammar errors, spelling and punctuation, and style. “Far too many alleged ‘grammatical errors’ aren’t mistakes at all: they presuppose rules that don’t exist and never did.” Pullum says that one such mythical error can be accurately dated.
“The dumbest myth in the whole history of the English language is the cockamamie notion that something might be wrong with having a sentence or a phrase with a preposition stranded at the end. We actually know who perpetrated this nonsense. John Dryden—a poet, translator; playwright, essayist, and literary critic—published an essay in 1762 defending his critical views on the work of his fellow writers. Dryden observed sniffily that Ben Johnson had written a line ending in from, and commented that “putting a preposition in the end of a sentence” was “a common fault with him.”
Dryden was so influential that “his eccentric observation stuck,” Pullum observes. “To this day there are English teachers who believe students should be taught not to use perfectly acceptable sentences like No one knew what she was talking about.
As someone said (it wasn’t Churchill, though), “This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I shall not put.”
I already knew from reading Pullum on the linguistics blog Language Log that he has a deliciously snarky turn of phrase.
Among Pullum’s “disrecommendations” in the section on further reading is Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language.” He writes, “Hordes of English teachers have been singing its praises for three-quarters of a century. It is full of sanctimonious virtue signaling, dishonestly cherry-picked examples, and dumb advice about writing that no one follows, like that you should never use any familiar phrase, and of course that you should never use the passive (when his own essay uses the passive far more than most writing in English does). My advice: Don’t even read it, but if an English teacher asks, pretend you think it’s wonderful.”
If you left school convinced that grammar lessons made no sense, well, you were right. Here you will find a version that does make sense, one you can use to improve your own writing.
And you will also be better prepared to defend yourself from grammar Nazis who really don’t know what they’re talking about.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (35)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Interesting post. It hit me as I am currently reading David Crystal's Making Sense: The Glamorous Story of English Grammar. Highly recommended. Well written and approaches grammar beginning with the grammatical construction of infants. Entertaining and informative. Crystal has written a number of very readable books on the English language.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Churchill was quoted as saying, "This is the kind of nonsense up with which I will not put."
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
A common pattern of stupid commentary is the criticism of a piece of writing based on silly, cooked-up grammar and usage rules.
A far more common, far more stupid, and vastly more self-righteous pattern is criticism of examples of that pattern of criticism.
The latter sort of critic sets himself up as not only more educated, but as a specimen of higher moral evolution and degree of evolution.
Judging by the examples you give of Pullum’s attacks on common fake grammatical rules…
- Never use any familiar phrase
- Never end a phrase or sentence with a preposition
- Never us the passive voice
…he is an honest, legitimate scholar, who eschews the second, more toxic form of grammatical teaching and criticism.
I was surprised and pleased to see that.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
[EDIT: Django, I apologize for my unkind and hypocritical Comment below, and for my dishonest attempts to justify it in a subsequent Comment.
I just read an article about a young man, Reeves Broussard, who just died. He was a man who made a difference in someone’s life every day. It cut right into me, how the only difference I’ve made today was to hurt someone for no good purpose.]
Django, I sympathize. I make this mistake a lot: making yourself look silly by not reading an article before commenting on it.
(If your comment was satirical, I take this back. It was brilliant. I don’t know your writing well enough to guess whether it was absurdist self-deprecation, or sincere.)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I quoted Churchill accurately according to the paperback book I have on Churchill because I thought his comment was relevant to the post. It goes no further than that. Feel free to ignore my comments in the future.
Yes, I did miss the reference above while casually reading the post.
You're seeing five of 35 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.