Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
When I hear and read the stories from law enforcement officers across the US, my compliments are low-key. "This officer is a competent and good police officer."
My low-key compliment may not seem to be enough praise, but it covers the most violent and tragic incidents. It includes death notifications and the acts of kindness known only to the officer and the recipient of that kindness.
There are both external and internal stresses in law enforcement work. Quality is far more important in policing than quantity. Quantity has become an infection in several professions in America, and law enforcement is no exception.
We live in a world where tolerance is not enough, you must engage in public displays of acceptance.
Josh is a good and competent law enforcement officer in Maine. The citizens of Maine are fortunate to have him as a game warden. That is not enough for some Mainers who are not looking for quality.
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (6)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
He could either watch the organization continue into the crapper while his career was unfairly stalled/ended by DEI or maybe get some camos in pride flag colors, demand that he be called by some sexually ambiguous first name (Pat, Ashley, Leslie, Morgan etc) and get a lawyer who threatens to sue if his employer tried to force him to declare a specific sexual identity. That way he might rise up the ladder.
Ultimately DEI kills whatever it takes over because acknowledging the existence of skills and traits actually relevant to the praxis of the organization is a direct threat to an ethos of promotion by identity and ideology.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
themainewire.com
Open link
MODERATOR • CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
We don't see much of her these days, but this would be a great post for @GrannyDude to weigh in on.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It might be better to not involve grannydude. This story is not quite the same as the old saying from police officers; "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity." This story is the inverse of that saying. In this story you can attribute malice to stupidity.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have long said Hanlon's Razor is dead. As stupidity increases, it creates a demand for malice to feed the stupidity. We are at the point where apparent stupidity is usually the use of the stupid by the malicious.
You're seeing five of six comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.