Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
Federalist Radio Hour
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
The Glenn Show
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Jonathan Turley writing in The Hill sharply corrects ABC's fact checks. The Hill is a DC institution, covering Congress and federal politics. They have never really distinguished themselves from the herd narrative on a consistent basis, but now they have done this:
“You are entitled to your opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.” That famous line from Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan (D-N.Y.) remains a virtual mantra for politicians and pundits. Yet, judging from the presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, we have officially entered the post-truth political era. ABC News has been widely criticized for the bias of the two moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir. Even liberal outlets acknowledged that the two journalists seemed inclined to “fact check” only Trump. In the meantime, they allowed clearly false statements from Harris go unchallenged. Three of the unchecked claims are being widely disseminated by supporters, including some in the media. Here are three legal “facts” that are being repeated despite being clearly untrue.
And the piece continues with careful refutations of three ABC "fact checks".
I do not carefully monitor news sources that have proven themselves truth-denying propaganda outlets. I watched Trump speak live at Charlottesville and then heard/read the coverage. The Charlottesville Hoax was spreading like wildfire in the opposition press. A scandalous lie, I even went back to hear the speech a second time to confirm the hoax, several "news" sources were stricken from my list in the wake of that. Truth is the only currency of value that any journalist has, and these news outlets were vigorously selling their credibility to support this ridiculous hoax.
The first sign that they might want to reconsider their course came with the recent gentle criticisms of Biden that they had been denying for years. Deep fakes, they said. But it wasn't that they had a change of heart, rather, the hidden director of their cross-industry propaganda efforts apparently found Biden's poll numbers unacceptable, and suddenly the gaffs and freezes and wanderings and sniffing were real and signs of deeper problems.
And at the debate, ABC made it crystal clear that they would lie to provoke Trump, to serve their propaganda director, reputation be damned. And other propaganda channels have continued to repeat these long-discredited facts under cover of ABC's subterfuge. I am pleased to find The Hill among the few organizations willing to call ABC out on their faithless disregard for the truth.
And thank you, Jonathan Turley.
Read the refutations, they are telling.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (15)
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Wow. I can only imagine the consequences that will be faced by ABC, Muir and Davis…
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
It just got more interesting. Linsey Davis spoke to the LA Times. ABC thought that the problem with the CNN debate was that Trump was allowed to speak without correction. She does claim that there was an intention to check both debaters. Impressive since, in the end, they "corrected" correct Trump answers and none of the many lies repeated by Harris were corrected. Very impressive, ABC.
In answer to @genferei's question, whatever consequences they suffer cannot be enough, from Harris' best buddy at the head of ABC News to the two would be executioners of Trump's campaign, Muir and Davis. Activists masquerading as journalists have no business being in the business.
Isn't that all of them these days?
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
All of them in the Democrat Media Complex, anyway.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
The cat eating claims have been debunked? By the governor? How would he know?? Is he an investigative journalist? Has he interviewed the neighbors? Like Chris Rufo, who brings the receipts for the cats on the barbie claim?
No matter how much you hate the media complex, it isn't enough.
You're seeing five of 15 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.