Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

3 Whisky Happy Hour
The Ricochet Podcast
GLoP Culture
Beyond the Polls with Henry Olsen
Federalist Radio Hour
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Gray Matters
Daily Signal
The Erick Erickson Show
Giving Ventures
Mom Wars
3 Martini Lunch
Chicks on The Right
Parsing Immigration Policy
What the Hell Is Going On
Freedom to Learn
The Learning Curve
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Heritage Explains
Not Dead Yet
Who Funds that?
The Glenn Show
Hillsdale Dialogues
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Libertarian
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
The American Idea
Madison’s Notes
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Back of the Book
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert Doar
Homeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.
Part One
Meet John. John is 33 and lives in his parents’ basement. John loves his parents, and John’s parents love John. These days, they don’t speak much. There are two doors to the basement. The one at the top of the stairs leads into the kitchen. The second door leads to the side yard. These days, John uses only the second door. John’s parents installed a doggie door in the kitchen door. John’s mother places cooked meals through the door. Later, John uses the doggie door to return the empty plates. Whenever John pushes through dirty sheets, towels, or clothes, John’s mom launders them and returns them through the doggie door. John’s parents won’t give John any money and won’t permit John to have roommates.
John is an addict. In the last 12 years, his longest stretch of sobriety lasted 172 days. John has entered three rehab programs. Graduated from one, kicked out of two. No one can remember how many times John has started attending 12-step meetings. Both John and his parents say the meetings help a lot. But then, John stops going.
Experts have told the parents that they are enabling John, but they have never kicked John out of the basement. Nonetheless, John often leaves for days, weeks, or months. All in all, John spends far more nights on the streets than in the basement.
John’s parents can’t cure John. If a cure existed, they would gladly pay for it.
Government also can’t cure John. Out of love, John’s parents will forever pay for things that fail. The truth is, a lot of taxpayers also love John. Those taxpayers would gladly pay for a cure. Very, very few taxpayers, however, wish to pay for cures that fail. No taxpayer wants to pay to give John clean needles.
Part Two
The vast majority of homeless in America are addicts. If you give an addict a small enclosed space to live, it will only take a week or two before that space begins to smell. No sane landlord will knowingly rent to an addict who is currently using. Addicts live outside by choice. Giving a using addict a hotel room, or a small apartment, is a complete waste of time and money.
In 2026, any NGO that says it will solve the homeless problem if government gives them a bunch of money is lying. The NGO that said that in 1996 was lying. The NGO that said that in 2006 was lying. The NGO that said that in 2016 was lying.
Any intelligent, altruistic NGO seeking to solve homelessness would give up after six months. Any NGO that stays in the business longer than six months is neither intelligent nor altruistic. They are in it for the money. They are a scam.
The intelligent, altruistic, and honest NGO would tell the government that homelessness is solved only if the underlying causes of mental illness and/or drug addiction are solved.
Part Three
Modern homelessness was born the day a federal judge ruled that a person without the financial ability to purchase housing cannot be arrested for not having a place to sleep. The law that could not be enforced was the law against loitering. No judge has ever ruled that drug laws may not be enforced.
City X cannot solve homelessness. What City X can do, however, is clear its downtown streets. City X has plenty of police officers who are well trained in spotting people who are under the influence of illegal drugs. If a mayor gives the order, those officers can walk down the street and arrest countless offenders. (See footnote.) While going to jail will not cure the addict, it will irritate the addict. Over time, the addicts will leave the sidewalks of City X. City X will improve. Might neighboring City Y get worse? Maybe, but City Y has well-trained police officers of their own.
Part Four
Jail is not rehab. Jail is not a long-term cure. Jail is a short-term cure. Thirty days in jail is thirty days without drugs. Sober addicts are more likely to choose rehab than using addicts. Jail is also unpleasant. Some addicts will seek to avoid a return trip to jail by leaving City X. Some addicts will seek to avoid a return trip to jail by getting high in basements and not in the street. (This does not improve the addict, but it does improve the city.) And finally, some might even seek to avoid a return trip to jail by staying sober.
G-Pub
Footnote: The officer’s expertise only supplies probable cause for the arrest. Any conviction will be based on the analysis of the blood and/or urine sample taken after the arrest.
This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (67)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Maybe. Depends on how corrupt the city is.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Still, I agree with the rest. One can also load 'em on buses and send them to NYC or LA.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I am a taxpayer that would pay for clean needles, because a drug addict with Hep C is worse for everybody than a drug addict without Hep C.
But you also set out why homelessness and drug addiction (and more general mental health issues) are national in their scope - because while they need to be solved locally there's always that temptation to just put the inconvenient expensive people on a bus and make them someone else's problem.
MODERATOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Cass Community Services in Detroit is not a Scam. Not sure of their success rate, but is not a scam. Do not over generalize.
CONTRIBUTOR
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
You're seeing five of 67 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.