Get the Ricochet app
Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

The Ricochet Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Beyond the Polls
GLoP Culture
Federalist Radio Hour
Not Dead Yet
Heritage Explains
Chicks on The Right
3 Martini Lunch
Call Me Back - with Dan Senor
The Learning Curve
The American Idea
The Erick Erickson Show
The Radio Free Hillsdale Hour
Daily Signal
Hillsdale Dialogues
Madison’s Notes
Mom Wars
What the Hell Is Going On
Parsing Immigration Policy
Freedom to Learn
Conservative Crossroads with Henry Olsen
The Conservative Woman’s Guide
Law Talk with Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
Giving Ventures
Who Funds that?
The Back of the Book
The Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’Connor
Gray Matters
The Report Card with Nat Malkus
The Glenn Show
The Libertarian
Martini Shot
The Dave Carter Show
The Powerline Show
In Dissent
Heard at Heritage
Smart Girl Politics
James Lileks’ The Diner
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
JobMakers
One on One with Robert DoarRicochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.
Greetings from Paris!
Electric vertical take-off and landing (eVTOL) is definitely on the descendant now. Lillium and Volocopter are gone. China displayed the kneecapper eHang.
Archer's Midnight was very pretty.
But not the real article - which has just been redesigned again. Which is why what they displayed is not their certification version.
Boeing's Wisk was there. So was Embraer's Eve. And Beta flew their Alia aircraft with conventional power and conventional (runway) takeoff. This airplane has the peculiar distinction of looking far uglier and more ungainly in person than in photographs. And it is no beauty queen even in photos.
More here.
I am on record saying (many times over) that eVTOL will fail colossally. All of them. Without exception. Wisk. Eve. Joby. Archer. Supernal. And countless others.
Why? For a host of reasons - but here's the nub: helicopters are better in every respect. And the eVTOL technical hurdles are insurmountable. Which is why not a single eVTOL has flown a single mission with the advertised payload and range - let alone repeatedly (which will be crucial - and much harder on batteries).
Recommended by MembersThis post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.
Discussion (29)
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Rather like a concrete canoe competition-possible, but not really practical other than for educational purposes.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Yet another application for very high energy density batteries. But instead of spontaneously combusting your $60,000+ runabout recharging in your garage, it will be in a pilotless vehicle flying over your neighborhood.
That'll be ... entertaining.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
That first one looks like it is modeled after a food processor for humans.
CHARTER MEMBER
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
Oh the unyielding B***h that is the periodic table and the unnegotiable physics that the available elements in this universe cannot get us to the energy density of the simple hydrocarbon.
The breaking the bonds between the parts of the elements is the density leap we should focus on. We need to reduce the current infrastructure overhead to get at that energy.
To read this bio, please join Ricochet.
I have packed my bags for the plane flight and have removed the dreaded lithium batteries banned from carryon suitcases even though they are merely contained there and not electronically connected to the suitcases. Oh, I can still carry them in my backpack. The logic seems to be I would notice a fire quicker in my bag stored under my seat than in the overhead. Explain to me how these flying machines with batteries are safe.
You're seeing five of 29 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.