3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenChicks on The RightParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson Show3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Gain-of-Dysfunction
August 10, 2026 at 6:33 AM

Gain-of-Dysfunction

Henry Racette
@HenryRacette

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark36likesJoin to like9comments

Gain-of-Dysfunction — It's when people, whatever their motives, set out to deliberately pursue ends that just a bit of honest research and reflection would suggest are ill-considered and almost certain to lead to bad outcomes. Some popular examples include:

Advocating Socialism: With few or no exceptions, socialism always results in poverty, and often in widespread starvation. In contrast, private property and free markets — what most people mean when they say "capitalism" — have produced the wealthiest and most secure societies in history with the largest and most comfortable middle classes.

Pushing "Green" Energy: It sounds great, but wind and solar are inappropriate for grid-scale power generation. That is, for the kind of power that homes and businesses rely on to function. Adding lots of wind and solar to the grid makes electricity more expensive and the grid less reliable. It eventually leads to brownouts, blackouts, and potentially catastrophic failures. Because physics.

Practicing Affirmative Action: When you elevate trivial details of ethnicity above merit, you end up with lower quality employees. In the worst cases, you get what Cambridge got: guys like Jason Arday, frauds and charlatans who parlay their ersatz victim-group status into underserved positions. They make their supporters look stupid and, ironically, undermine respect for everyone who looks like them. In every case, favoring identity x over merit means people will inevitably come to see people of identity x as less capable than others. This is because that will be their "lived experience."

Embracing the Unchecked Immigration of an Incompatible Culture: That's a mouthful, but it simply describes what's happening in Europe right now. When you allow in millions of people who are antithetical to your values, you end up losing your culture. So Europe now has large populations of Muslim immigrants (and their children) who think it's okay to rape women and girls, beat gays and Jews, and murder non-Muslims.

Ignoring Mental Illness: Whether embracing the nonsensical idea that sex is an illusion and that boys can be girls, or excusing rampant homelessness with its tent cities and widespread theft and looting, catering to people with psychological problems is bad for them, and, usually, bad for everyone else. Some people need counseling. Some people need institutionalization. Making a virtue of their dysfunction does nothing to make their lives better.

All of these are obvious — or should be obvious — mistakes, as obvious as funding the amplification of the infectious qualities of novel respiratory viruses.

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (9)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Sandra Blondie Bright@Blondie·9w

    Most of the people who believe these things want them to be true, for whatever reason. That's really why they don't do the research or listen to anyone who may present them with the facts. Also, white, college educated, women. (I know I sound like a broken record, but it's true.)

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Susan Quinn@SusanQuinn·9w

    I wish I knew how to turn these delusions around! These people are on a path to destroy our country, and we need to stop them.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    DonG (Here.We.Go.)@DonG·9w

    It is hard to outlaw bad ideas. We'll have to try to create a cancel culture for bad ideas.

    We can have a set of kids PSA's with lessons on the evils of "Dysfunction Junction".

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    David Foster@DavidFoster·9w

    "Green Energy"....it seems almost impossible to get across to people that electricity is a very different kind of thing than those commodities that can be easily and cheaply stored.

    Part of the problem is the scientific and technological ignorance of the vast majority of journalists and media people. Very few of them grasp the difference between a kilowatt and a kilowatt-hour, which is pretty important when you're talking about energy storage.

  • CHARTER MEMBER

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    David Foster@DavidFoster·9w

    "Advocating Socialism"...in the introduction to my review of Francis Spufford's great book 'Red Plenty', I said:

    The idea of centralized economic planning is a very seductive one. It just seems to make sense that such planning would lead to more efficiency…less waste…and certainly less unnecessary human suffering than an environment in which millions of decision-makers, many of them in competition with one another, are making their own separate and uncoordinated decisions, resulting in pointless product redundancy, economic cycles driving unemployment, and lots of other bad things.

    Spufford's book shows vividly why such planning doesn't really work. But it's not really an obvious conclusion to most people unless they have lived under such a system, studied history and economics seriously, and/or are exceptionally intelligent. Red Plenty review

Scroll for later comments
+4 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of nine comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •