3 Whisky Happy HourThe Ricochet PodcastGLoP CultureBeyond the Polls with Henry OlsenParsing Immigration PolicyFederalist Radio HourWhat the Hell Is Going OnFreedom to LearnDaily SignalThe Erick Erickson ShowChicks on The Right3 Martini LunchThe Learning CurveThe Conservative Woman’s GuideHeritage ExplainsNot Dead YetGiving VenturesWho Funds that?The Radio Free Hillsdale HourThe Glenn ShowFirst Things PodcastCall Me Back - with Dan SenorHillsdale DialoguesLaw Talk with Epstein, Yoo & CookeThe LibertarianThe Report Card with Nat MalkusThe Kevin Roberts Show with Larry O’ConnorThe American IdeaMadison’s NotesConservative Crossroads with Henry OlsenMom WarsThe Back of the BookGray MattersMartini ShotThe Dave Carter ShowThe Powerline ShowIn DissentHeard at HeritageSmart Girl PoliticsJames Lileks’ The DinerCase in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and CultureJobMakersOne on One with Robert DoarHomeschooling Journeys with Curious MikeHubwonk

Get the Ricochet app

Ricochet will work fine in a browser on your mobile devices, but for the best experience please download our app.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

  1. Main Feed/
  2. Should we wake the President?
December 7, 2024 at 5:02 PM

Should we wake the President?

Justin Other Lawyer
@DouglasMyers

To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

Join to bookmark22likesJoin to like37comments

Charlie Cooke at NRO has a Corner post detailing discussions within the White House advocating preemptive pardons for Biden allies. Perhaps most curious, however, is that Mr. Biden is not involved in those discussions at this point. This got me thinking…

Obviously, the constitutional pardon power is exclusive to the President and is generally unreviewable. But what happens to a pardon if it can be argued that the president didn’t understand what he was doing or was incapable of making the decision? Do we even know whether Mr. Biden knows he pardoned Hunter? Should the judges in Hunter’s matters ask for a sworn statement from Mr. Biden?

In most areas of the law, incapacity is grounds for voiding contracts, wills, etc. I can’t imagine that pardons should be any different just because someone had access to the seal and auto-pen. It’s not hard to imagine staffers shoving papers in front of Biden for him to sign on January 19. Is it too much to imagine him having little or no idea what he’s signing?

Seems possible to me. What do you all think?

This post was promoted to the Main Feed at the recommendation of Ricochet's members.

Discussion (37)

Sign in to commentSign in
  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y

    I like it.

    "Here's your menu for next week with extra ice cream, Mr. President. Just sign right here."

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y
    ReplyingtoArahant

    Arahant (View Comment):

    I like it.

    “Here’s your menu for next week with extra ice cream, Mr. President. Just sign right here.”

    Except on January 19, the menu would just be for the next DAY.

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    Arahant@Arahant·1y
    Replyingtokedavis

    Arahant (View Comment):

    I like it.

    “Here’s your menu for next week with extra ice cream, Mr. President. Just sign right here.”

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Except on January 19, the menu would just be for the next DAY.

    But will Joe know that?

  • To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    kedavis@kedavis·1y
    ReplyingtoArahant

    Arahant (View Comment):

    I like it.

    “Here’s your menu for next week with extra ice cream, Mr. President. Just sign right here.”

    kedavis (View Comment):

    Except on January 19, the menu would just be for the next DAY.

    Arahant (View Comment):

    But will Joe know that?

    Probably not. They could have told him some time ago that he'd already served two terms. Although then it might have been more difficult to get him to sign things.

  • MODERATOR

    To read this bio, please join Ricochet.

    E. Kent Golding@EKentGolding·1y

    The 25th is available, and I think a quick impeachment would be delightful. Otherwise, his handlers have the full power of the presidency.

Scroll for later comments
+32 more comments
Join the conversation

You're seeing five of 37 comments. Sign in, or join for just $5 per month, to read them all and add your own.

Trending

Become a member.

Tired of the toxicity of social media? Why not join Ricochet for just $5/month? Think of it as an online bar. Come in, have a drink, hang out, say whatever you want. But don’t badger, bully, or berate the other drinkers. That's our only rule.

Join Ricochet

Get the Ricochet app

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
  • •
  • •